Thursday, November 11, 2004

The Wings of an Eagle...

Evolutionists have some interesting stories and narratives, mythological narratives about the way their mommy Nature "selects" things and so on. I noted an old one that was once, and among some still is seriously promoted as the "Tree Down Theory."

It looks a little like this: "Once upon a time, a group of avian ancestors were jumping around in trees. They jumped around for various reasons. But some of them fell down and died. The rest, they just kept on jumping. Thanks to the fact that some of them fell down and died the ones that survived began to change. Because of random mutations in their genetic code the information that made them began to be written differently. The daddy random mutation wrote a change and so mommy Nature selected his good lil' changes to the code. The random mutator is such a good writer, do you not know? He'll write you a lil' story about X-men too, after all.

So what happend was the avian ancestors began to grow one lil' wing, then another lil' wing. Then, the feathers, one lil' feather, then another lil' feather....also, the male and the female both grew the right reproductive organs at the right time, right on time. It was very romantic, random mutation just kept writing it down, just so.

Then, mommy Nature kept selecting the best parts to make for some diversity! So they grew the avian lung which breathes both ways. Plus the sphincter muscles so, no lil' leaks, now that is a good selection! In the end, once upon a lot of time they just happened to have two lil' wings and enough lil' feathers that they flew, flew on away!"

That's basically the way geeks do some story telling. One maverick biologist notes the actual biology of some things:

"On the whole, however, even the most tentative schemes outlining a sequence of events are seldom convincing. Take, for example, the problem of the origin of birds. The flight feather of a bird is one of the most beautiful and well known of all biological adaptations. Each feather consists of a central shaft carrying a series of barbs which are positioned at right angles to the shaft to form the vane. The barbs which make up the vane are held together by rows of barbules. From the anterior barbules, hooks project downward and these interlock with ridges on the posterior barbules. Altogether, in the flight feather of a large bird, about a million barbules cooperate to bind the barbs into an impervious vane.

The feather is a magnificent adaptation for flight. Flight feathers are remarkably light and strong and anyone who has played with one will know how easily a ruffled feather can be repaired merely by drawing it between the fingers. In addition to its lightness and strength the feather has also permitted the exploitation of a number of sophisticated aerodynamic principles in the design of the bird’s wing.

One problem common to all aerofoils is turbulence, which reduces lift and causes stalling. Turbulence can be greatly cut down by the provision of slots in the aerofoil which let through part of the air stream and tend to smooth down the flow. Aeroengineers have used this principle by placing a small subsiduary aerofoil in front of the main wing, creating the so-called Handley Page slot. The use of feathers in the design of an aerofoil lends itself admirably to the provisions of slots, and most birds’ wings exploit this technique. The use of feathers also provides the bird with an aerofoil of variable geometry so that it has the ability to vary the shape and aerodynamic properties of its wing at take-off, landing, and for various different sorts of flight — flapping, gliding, soaring. In many birds, the positioning of the feathers is maintained by an intricate system of tendons which allow the feathers to twist in such a way that when the wing is raised they open like the vanes of a blind, greatly reducing resistence, but close completely on the downstroke, thus greatly improving the efficiency of flight. One need only watch the darting-backwards-and- forwards flight of the humming bird to grasp something of the excellent aerodynamic properties of the feathered aerofoil.

It is almost universally accepted by evolutionary biologists that birds evolved from reptiles, and that the feather evolved from a reptile’s scale."
(Evolution: A Theory In Crisis, Michael Denton :202-203)

Yes, what evolves rather quickly are evolutionists hypotheses. These are their lil' stories about things. They seem to be capable of making up a story about anything. It's creative, yet not science.

The new one:
"Once upon a time, a group of lizards who would be avian ancestors jumped, jumped up in the air! Then, they started growing one lil' feather, then another lil' feather...."

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

Sir -

i am sorry, but your comments about the origins of birds and feathers are most out of date! YOu better get acquainted with the research that has been done during the past five years. I suppose that as an American, you should not have much trouble in getting info about what results have been obtained by researchers at Yalem and at the American Museum of Natural History. This research has uncover very detailed inoformation about feathered dinosaurs, dinosaurs with feathers- but unable to fly, as well as microraptor, withe four wings, carnivorous dinosaurs with feathers et cetera.

Feathers are not developed from sclaes, but from skin.
That is how birds grow feathers even to this day! Dinosaurs and the transitional species, as well as the birde themselves never had scales!

I would have to check my sources if I shuld be able to give further details, dates, names and so on, but fossils found i Lioniang, China durin the last few years have reavelad a lot that was not known when the current cretionsit litterature on the subject was written.

I am sorry, you better find another subject, a subjet that (hopefully) science has not yet been able to cover to your satisfaction.

Sincerely,

Rolf Aalberg, Norway
rolf.aalberg@c2i.net

mynym said...

"i am sorry, but your comments about the origins of birds and feathers are most out of date! YOu better get acquainted with the research that has been done during the past five years. I suppose that as an American, you should not have much trouble in getting info about what results have been obtained by researchers at Yalem and at the American Museum of Natural History. This research has uncover very detailed inoformation about feathered dinosaurs..."

There have always been flightless and feathered, birds. Yet the empirical evidence demonstrates that a feather, yep, it's a feather. It's not a half-feather, half-scale. This is the typical typology of Nature, which eyes being eyes, not half-eyes, half-photo-receptive spot. These are the types of empirical facts found that organisms fit types, thousands upon thousands of times.

"...dinosaurs with feathers- but unable to fly..."

And? There are flightless birds with feathers, and unable to fly to this day. Both birds and humans have eyes, does this mean that they share a common ancestor?

"...carnivorous dinosaurs with feathers et cetera."

...and?

"Feathers are not developed from sclaes, but from skin.
That is how birds grow feathers even to this day!
"

From their skin? Are you going to grow feathers from your skin, just because you have skin? Evolutionists are just making up a story and then using typological features of organisms to pretend that they can be merged. I note how little detail there is to what you are sayings. Rather, you are only arguing that because dinos had feathers then well, that means that birds can have a dino ancestor.

I would also note that the term "bird" and "dino" are rather vast categories when what you are talking about as evolution has to be an actual lineage, not some vague handwaving towards conceptual categories that contain millions of species.

"Dinosaurs and the transitional species, as well as the birde themselves never had scales!"

If you would go into detail instead of relying on concepts of categories (that don't actually physically exist except as an abstraction or "form" used by the human mind) then each specific and empirical lineage that you set up will have serious problems that raise serious doubts about it.

So far all you are really saying is, "Look some dinos had feathers...and would you look at that, birds have feathers too! This must mean that birds came from dinos."

That is not tracing an ancestry. That is using vast concepts and abstractions about categories such as "dino" or "bird" which can contain anything from an ostrich to a humming bird to make the human mind imagine a scenario in its own abstractions. That is not empirical.