Wednesday, September 17, 2014

Rambling 9/17

Hagee's house and ranch sure are big, regardless...  so apparently nationalism and Zionism are a successful mega church empire building strategy.  Failing that, there's always Osteen's even more successful Happy Meal strategy.  How nice! 

Osteen, net worth $40 million. House: $10.5 million... federal reserve notes.  View of Zionism or anything of significance in the world other than happy feelings?  Priceless.

Hagee, net worth supposedly $5 million but John C. Hagee Royalty Trust provided a $5.5 million dollar ranch, etc.  View from a former member of his church:  "I don't even have a house! My kids grew up on top of each other like sardines. ... I just want a little house." She added, "I thought something was wrong with me. Why am I still [living like this]. I've given and given and given and tithed and tithed and tithed."  Guess she didn't stand with Israel enough.

I'm not sure.  But it seems like when people start with church empire building within the context of their civilization or marketing demographic... well, I'm not sure about that.  "I'm the brand!"  Marc Driscoll (reportedly)  Then there are the trendies, they seem to be pretty good at marketing.  So they have their own ideas about church building in the context of their culture.  With all this going on, who is left to cultivate the culture?  "Fundamentalists."  I guess.  But if Bill Gothard and others are any measure then they have their own problems.  Sorry, just processing...     

Ramble 9/17

Rambling from here.

Besides playing with arts and crafts some, that might be about it.  Or perhaps they could also learn something useful on the side, like how to make their own electric cars or grow their own hemp and medicine essentially for free.  Or how to make a solar panel, how to garden, etc.  Basically, at this point, a lot of the stuff that's being taught basically for free on the internet and Youtube. 

The ruling class tends to take a special interest in creating, maintaining and monetizing a war on drugs, a war on terror and so forth.  So "Common Core" for the commoners is probably going to be about educating the witless, football watching and fantasy football playing public of Team America, World Police on the Constitution, Declaration and the currency they're using...  as well as their Democratic and Republican* history of rebelling against central banksters and their interests, right? 

 Nope.  Probably not.

*Formerly Democratic and Republican... now that almost everyone seems to have been turned into Zionist RINOs and DINOs incapable of putting the interests of their own nation first.  One could be forgiven for wondering if for all the aggression of the current establishment that they may still go the way of the Dodo sometime within our lifespans.  Especially given that they can't even so much as pass a budget or plan for anything beyond the "optics" of being a political "pet" or "not a witch" tomorrow, etc.   (Apparently.)

After all, apparently bird brained Dodos were a fat and aggressive species always looking to fight at one point too.  They were probably even fairly dominant in their environment too.  But where are they now?   

Tuesday, September 16, 2014

AND THe NeXT LeHMaN MoMeNT Is... by williambanzai7


Racist Neocon now trying to smear my podcast guests

Rambling about local blogs...


Do "schools" in America even teach the trivium anymore?   Probably not.  Look at all these people... they are the best political animals (and pets, like Coons!) that the American oligarchy has to offer after they're groomed in supposedly elite schools and so forth.  Little wonder that the clueless peasants below have been getting rather restless with their ruling class in recent years.

Looking to Obama as a person with god-like intelligence that would make everything better (Without liberals putting aside being trendy to actually try to tell the truth* about 911, etc.) was just another aspect of their progressively growing stupidity.

*Trendy... for instance, still waiting on the Pentagon to reveal geoengineering and weather weapons as the problem/reaction/solution to liberal ideas about "climate change.  They've already begun trickling some information out merging the War Inc. on terror with "climate change."  Meanwhile progressives seem to be once again acting like some witless form of controlled opposition.  Apparently they don't want to be too much like "conspiracy theorists" and only a little bit "crazy" based on a "suckle on the teat of Mother Earth"/Leftist perspective where the feminine is idolized (Not half so subtly and "nuanced" as they imagine, either.) .  So they trend along in that direction, usually pretty much thoroughly controlled by trends of information in the  and then they wonder why all their hope for change turns into hopium without much, if any, real "change."  What did you expect, a free solar powered pony?  Is that what your military industrial complex and multinational corporations are running on or policing the world based on?  Progressives couldn't even focus on the facts of Operation Iraqi Liberation/OIL, when foreign interests hijacked your military industrial complex for their own ends and transitioned from the "Cold War" to the "War on Terror."   It's supposed to be a new epoch of war in a New American Century.  If you're into that sort of thing. 

Apparently all trendy progressives can do is point to conservatives and argue that's another whole realm of basically being clueless. But seriously, so what?  Delaware Liberal and Delaware Politics should merge...  after all, what are you really disagreeing about?  (Biden's supposed nudism... wow...  just when one would think that it couldn't get any more useless, local conservatives and progressives begin debating the supposed nudism of Joe "the buffoon" Biden.  Is he a buffoon or is that just an act?  If all the world is a stage and the show must go on, does it matter?) 

Conservatives want to borrow ponzi into existence out of nothing from a private banking cartel to spend on the military to nation build in Israel (mainly) and other nations (Where what they do looks suspiciously like nation destroying.  Was that Operation Freedumb and Dumbocracy* or Operation Fooled Again?)  Progressives want to borrow ponzi into existence out of nothing to nation build in their own nation, supposedly.  But then it turns out that they do not do that and usually can rather easily be terrorized back into nation destroying in the name of nation building, due to the "war on terror."  (They'll probably be passing another "patriot act" soon enough.  After all, for progressives and conservatives these days...  patriotism is an act.  More entertainment.)                  

*Progressives and conservatives may say or think,  "If only he wasn't anti-Semitic..  If only he wasn't Islamophobic.  If only he didn't criticize Christian Zionism.  If only he wasn't so anti-American.  f only this fellow wasn't sarcastic.  If only he was nice, then I might agree.... or somethin'."  Keep telling yourselves that.  You're the people supporting starving over 500,000 Iraqi children to death and so forth based on supporting "Operation Oops" bringing them yet more Freedumb and Dumbocracy.  So there is all that going on in the background, to this day.  (Still waiting on Israel to contribute to bombing ISIS in their "war on terror" in the region.  Have they signed on to the coalition to bomb Iraq, once again, yet?) 

Anyway, it seems to me that a little sarcasm won't kill any of you. 

Friday, September 12, 2014


National Journal: The planned cuts to the Pentagon's budget put the U.S. military on a dangerous course with too few resources to fight, a majority of National Journal's National Security Insiders say.

"The threat is increasing as our defenses atrophy," one Insider said. "Nation-building at home is not a national security strategy."

I had to read that a few times. It's almost as if this is a satire of "insider traders." 

Nation building at home is not a national security strategery?  So then, what is the strategy? Nation building the whole world first... or just nation building Israel and then everyone else first?

That's going well.

The Pentagon's plan accepts the right degree of risk, but sequestration poses real dangers for America and the world.

At this point the Pentagon should probably just issue their own currency and call it the hexagon.  That way they could incorporate putting a hex on everyone incorporated in their "budget."

We’ve repeatedly documented that military waste and fraud are the core problems with the U.S. economy.
For example, we’ve noted that we wouldn’t be in this crisis of hitting the debt ceiling in the first place if we hadn’t spent so much money on unnecessary wars … which are horrible for the economy.
But it goes far beyond actual fighting.  We could easily slash the military and security budget without reducing our national security.
For example, homeland security agencies wasted money on seminars like “Did Jesus Die for Klingons Too?” and training for a “zombie apocalypse” instead of actually focusing on anti-terror efforts.
Republican Senator Tom Coburn notes that the Department of Defense can reduce $67.9 billion over 10 years by eliminating the non-defense programs that have found their way into the budget for the Department of Defense.
BusinessWeek and Bloomberg point out that we could slash military spending without harming our national security. Indeed, we could slash boondoggles that even the generals don’t want.
BusinessWeek provides a list of cost-cutting measures which will not undermine national security. American Conservative does the same.
Moreover, we’ve shown that the military wastes and “loses” (cough) trillions of dollars.  See this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this and this.
The former Secretary of Defense acknowledged in May 2012 that the DOD “is the only major federal agency that cannot pass an audit today.”  The Pentagon will not be ready for an audit for another five years, according to Panetta.

   “$8.5 TRILLION In Taxpayer Money Doled Out By Congress To The Pentagon Since 1996 … Has NEVER Been Accounted For”
     If they don't focus on accountability and "nation-building at home" instead of among corrupt Arab tribalists and religious fanatics as a national security strategy soon, there may not be much of a "nation" left to support their budgets and full faith and credit in the debt/money it's based on. 

Why don't they just issue their own currency directly, since they're generally in charge of getting more ponzi created through War Inc. while policing the world for global corporations formed out of it? 

What's the hold up with the Pentagon issuing a hex as currency instead of going through all the rigamarole of having Congress borrow national debt/money into existence from a private banking cartel, to give to the Pentagon to lose?  8.5 trillion doled out. 2.3 trillion "unaccounted" for. 

Isn't the so-called "national debt" being created and brokered by bankers and their business partners in Congress only 17 trillion?