Wednesday, December 17, 2014

More research and processing thoughts... not going to get into this where it was posted.

....who have seen all of those taxes soar even while services decline and crime increases.

 The actual reason for crime increasing.

There aren't enough people from other ethnic groups (whether the descendents of Pilgrims or Polish immigrants, Asians, Russians, whoever) to maintain a majority black city, let alone build it. 

There are a few good black men.  That's the primary, primal and most basic problem.  

The few good men that there are, a few good church leaders and so on is not enough to "carry" all the dead weight of the community.  Neither they nor "white burden" types can change all the thousands of decisions by which individual African Americans create something called "inner city black culture." 

That's all.  You're not going to change or avoid the most important facts about these majority black cities (Fergadishu, Wilmington, etc.) by focusing on tax rates or a hike on sewer taxes... or whatever you're talking about. 

That's silly.

Research ramble 12/17

You either have a rural society with very few public services and then you can have a low tax base and low cost of living, because you do for yourself. — Or, you have a social utopia with all kinds of services and government handouts — and a very high tax rates and high cost of living.

Anyway, here's the politician in this case: Mayor of Wilmington/ Dennis P. Williams/ PROMISED SAFETY AND SECURITY

"We're going to give them all the social services avenues that they need to get their life back..." 

Like JP Morgan's food stamp business?    How are all these social services going to be monetized in the "blue state" cities?  What happens to JP Morgan's EBT business when the derivatives market does what it's most likely going to need to do? 

"If I'm elected then you're going to see some things that you've never seen before." 

I wouldn't blame him for black crime in any of these cities where the "minority" becomes the majority that tends to overwhelm the forms of civilization that other ethnic groups usually built up and left.  There's no way that a few good black men can come in as leaders to change the results of the decisions of numerous individuals that created "culture." 

A few good men are certainly better than nothing... but what are they supposed to do when this* is the culture of crap that they have to work with?    

But all that aside...  look at his claims, he's the one claiming to be able to do that.  So he's responsible, apparently.  (???) 

(Some of his ideas are bad to the extent that they even do anything as far as cultivating the culture while policing crime... like having the police buy more drugs from drug dealers in order to try to win the "war on drugs.")

Meh.... racist. I blame reality.

Look also at the possibilities of rising taxes on gasoline, property, sewer, water and electricity, especially for Wilmingtonians...

It would seem that for many residents of Wilmington that paying their utility bills is not high on their list of priorities.

It's not entirely clear how many keep the lights on in the first place.    Democrats are probably going to accuse you of racism eventually for pointing out all the problems in Wilmington like this.  And then you can both play your political games, in order to try to get power.

But as far as I go, observing the world makes me more of a racial realist by the day: 
Today most scientists and historians engaged in the serious study of race do so from either the race-realist or the hermeneutical perspective. On one side, those I have termed race-realists view race as a natural phenomenon to be observed, studied, and explained. They believe human race is a valid biological concept, similar to sub-species or breeds or strains. On the other side, those I term the hermeneusticists view "race" as an epiphenomenon, (like gender as opposed to "sex") a mere social construction, with political and economic forces as the real causal agents. Rather than actually research race, hermeneuticists research those who study race. Alternative and intermediate positions certainly exist, but the most heated debate currently takes place between advocates of those polar positions.
   The race-realist approach is empirical and employs a myriad of scientific methodologies....
 The hermeneutical approach relies on textual, historical, and political analysis. The race-realist viewpoint is descriptive, explanatory, and typically avoids prescribing policy. Because the hermeneutical viewpoint sees inexorable links between theory and practice, its writings are often prescriptive and assume an advocacy position. To their opponents, the race-realist approach comes across as cold, detached, and suspect of hiding a "racist" agenda. Hermeneuticists appear to race-realists as muddled, heated, and ideologically committed to an anti-racist activism.   --Philippe Rushton, 2002
  With respect to "policy"... I have little to say to the diverse groups and tribes of which "white people" are composed other than:  Leave.  What are you, missionaries with the proverbial "white man's" burden that looks suspiciously like a white woman's mentality to this day?  They can either do it themselves or they cannot do it.  That's it.  You're either smothering them with all your "projects" and nurture or they cannot do it.  Face facts.  

It's not that complicated.  So leave.  And when there's nowhere else to go, then carefully and in a measured way "go tribal" on those responsible if that's what you think is necessary to protect your own tribe.

It's curious that conservatives support this massive national security state, financed by banking tribes that generally leads to the murder of peasants world wide...  and yet they will not form a well regulated militia in the name of actually protecting their own interests and tribe.  What are you even doing?  What do you think you're doing?  You're going to traipse around the world checking for WMDs in people's underpants while nation building, killing many in the process... and yet you can't do diddly about your own neighborhoods or "nation building" wherever there are majority black regions in the nation? 

I don't get it.  Shrug.    Guess I'm not politically correct, as usual.  But you condemn the liberals for "political correctness" while practicing forms of it yourselves.     

Comments on Team America and their freedumb...

new Freddie
Freddie's picture
Well American troops and Americans are lower than illegal aliens according to Congress.   Congress and Obama do not listen to Americans.  So why would anyone fight and die for a country when you are treated lower than piss?
The troops are treated like shit in joke wars where they get blown up for nothing.  Their votes during elections are thrown in the garbage.  Any benefits are cut and if they are lucky they might get a dog for their blown off legs.
The most disgusting thing is the meaningless "Support the Troops" bullshit.  If you really supported the troops you would stand up to stop the midnless phony wars.
Tue, 12/16/2014 - 23:35 | 5561708 new Disc Jockey
Disc Jockey's picture
Vote up!
I agree that we need to stop these wars from occuring but you'll find little pity here in regards to our modern vets.
The troops are mercenaries that enter into a contractual agreement to fight for the oligarchy while being promised all sorts of goodies: super easy home loans, tax free sundries at any local base, and thousands in college money.  Why should I care if they get anything from the beast? I worked my ass off to get the pittance of income I scrape in daily and a good portion of which pays for their spoils.
Admittedly, a lot of the poor bastards didn't know any better when they signed up and for those I have litterally wept, but on the other hand I have very little pity for the ones that went in with open eyes or even just with the lust to kill and earn a few bucks. If we're talking Vietnam vets...totally different, but the boy in uniform today made a choice.
I especially will not have some vet come to my house and tell me that because "freedom isn't free" he needed to run off and kill lots of brown people in some far off land for my rights.
Fuck that guy. I am a sovereign man.  My rights ARE. They are not some gift presented from powers on earth and certainly not from some snotty brat what who wanted to go shoot people at the taxpayers expense.
When are they going to go after our domestic enemies as is required in their oath? If they start shooting bankers, the corrupt cops, and storm Mordor on the Potomac...well then we may have something, but I'm not holding my breath.
Let the red arrows come. I will wear them as a badge of honor.
Wed, 12/17/2014 - 00:47 | 5561859 new TheReplacement
TheReplacement's picture
That guy that had to run off and kill lots of brown people believed he was doing it to protect his and yours from more imminent attacks.  Just like the financial system, defense is a lie that is still believed by a good number of people.  Just today Fox was saying (I know, I was not the one to turn it on but I certainly let my disgust be known) something like 60-70% or more of Americans supported torturing people and thought the Dems were evil for exposing the evil that is the CIA and that the CIA is holier than a suicide bomber.
You know that scene from the Matrix were Morpheus teaches Neo that everyone is a potential enemy even though we are fighting to save them all?  That much is our lives on the big screen.
Wed, 12/17/2014 - 01:39 | 5561916 new Disc Jockey
Disc Jockey's picture
It just so happened that NBC was on this evening (not my choice either) and I happened to overhear those stats of apporval for the use of torture.
51% Say the interrogation practices were acceptable.
45% Think they should be used in the future.
Seriously America. What the fuck? Have we fallen so far? I'm ashamed at what my beautiful country has come to represent. We've become a nation of cowards and for what?
I had a vet as a roommate that signed up the week after Sept. 11th back in 2001.  My opinions on the military "service," economics, and politics are largely based on the long drinking conversations we had in that crappy little apartment in Virginia.
He went to Afghanistan, saw his buddies get blown up, protected poppy fields, witnessed some terrible deaths of civilians, and pretty quickly gathered that they were doing absolutely nothing in the way of protecting his family or even improving the lives of the locals.
As soon as he could, he got the hell out and never looked back.
My heart went out to the poor guy...really fucked with his whole perspective on the world and turned him into a sad broken dude.  I picked him up from the bar quite a few nights and once I'd chaffuered him home he'd cling to my arm like a lost child as walked him to the couch so he could pass out. I had my eyes opened by him more than any one person and still to this day I owe him for imparting all that knowledge.
Everyday I see things and my eyes bug out when I realize that we'd talked about it 4 years back only I'd thought he was at least partially crazy.  He introduced me to ZH back then as well and I have been lurking until just recently.

Tuesday, December 16, 2014

Yeah... I don't think I'm going to post this where I wrote it. They're pretty much brain dead on the topic of Judeo/"neoconservatism" anyway.

Bill Kristol made the case for aggressively defending the heroes who kept us safe with aggressive interrogation tactics.

If they were actually doing that instead of careerists jamming tubes up people's butts in order to play pretend about the terrible job they did protecting the American people from foreign governments on 911.... then he might have a case.    But since he doesn't have a case, note that in the process of torturing false confessions out of the CIA's own privateers and criminals that they often work with otherwise (for our sake, etc.), they wind up covering for Bill Kristol and the dancing Israelis that Michael "Talmudic scholar" Chertoff apparently let go. 

They never had some clueless careerist over at the CIA put a tube up their butt, etc.     

It is worth hearing out. It is not only the right thing to do, but smart politics.

I'll hear him out.    But know who you're listening to and what their interests are:
(PNAC). William Kristol, son of Irving, also founded in 1995 a new magazine, The Weekly Standard, which immediately became the dominant voice of the neoconservatives thanks to funding from the pro-Israeli Rupert Murdoch. In 1997, it would be the first publication to call for a new war against Saddam Hussein. It is also during the Clinton years that the FBI investigated an Israeli mole in the White House, who was enjoying privileged access to the National Security Council. According to British investigator Gordon Thomas (Gideon’s Spies, 1999) , the FBI investigation was called off when “Israel blackmailed President Clinton with phone -tapes of his steamy sex talks with Monica Lewinsky.”* [351] Others see a broader scheme. Noting that White House aide Lewinsky was the daughter of Zionist East European immigrants, and that she had kept her incriminating blue dress unwashed for two years as evidence of having had sex with the President, the Syrian newspaper Tishrin Al-Usbu'a concluded, in its August 24 , 1998 issue: “Her goal was to embarrass President Clinton, to blackmail him and weaken his status before Netanyahu’s government.” But, of course, such reasoning is attacked by the Anti-Defamation League as anti-Semitic. [352] After eight years of Clinton, the neocons finally had their revenge by having a second George Bush, son of the first, cornered into a second Iraq war in 2003. In 2008 their hold on him was such that they could convince him of launching a new ”Surge” of 20,000 men despite strong public opposition, but with the support of their pro-Surge group Freedom’s Watch, whose membership was, as the Jewish Telegraph Agency remarked, “almost all Jewish.” [353] Thomas Neumann, Executive Director of the JINSA, could then describe Bush junior’s administration as “the best administration for Israel since Harry Truman.” [354]
  (Guyénot, Laurent (2013-12-22). JFK-9/11: 50 Years of Deep State. Progressive Press.)

Smart politics?  Perhaps, as dumb as split "Right vs. Left" or "East vs. West"  goyim/tribes usually are...  that might actually be true.  And you have to play to the right, no matter the truth.. right? Although it may be that you're underestimating how quickly peasants are catching on to what has been happening around them these days.  There's a few there, that I just linked to.  Many may not even know all that much, yet apparently they know enough about Bill Kristol. 

How many times was the Jewish Right planning on using the same "WMD" methods to create pretexts for war?  Syria too?  Seriously?  Even peasants not paying attention asked me, "Are they lying  AGAIN???  I don't know, it's just gotten to the point where I don't believe anything anymore... Republicans or Democrats.

(Bill Kristol: Bomb Syria So We Can Bomb Iran So ... - Wonkette)
(Bill Kristol, Leon Wieseltier urge Syria action - POLITICO)
(Kristol Urges GOP To Authorize War With Iran After Syria)
('Red Line' On Syria, Bill Kristol Calls Pres ... - Mediaite)

But perhaps things are gradually changing... some peasants took the time to give Bill Kristol trouble about the truth at his speeches and I'm here giving you trouble too.  They also had some trouble trying to search Assad's underpants for WMDs in Syria in order to attack Syria with a coalition of willing criminals/Saudi/Turkish/Qatari scumbags in the region recently.  Although they're kind of going through with Syria anyway, bombs away! Etc. 

They finally have to use their own bombs and planes to do it, though.  What progress this is.  What hopium from the Labor Zionists of Obama Inc.... for a change from putting Israeli interests first!  Charles Krauthammer must be really frustrated that Obama Inc. (despite being supported by the Jewish Left and surrounded by Zionists) still refused to trip over his own red line and supposedly condemns "enhanced interrogation."  

Apparently he wandered around in the garden thinking about his red line on Syria.   Or something like that.  It's either that or he started wondering about what factions in the American military would do based on yet more BS.  I remember one forum where a fellow said, "You go through with this and you'll see how antisemitic I can get."    

Avoiding the "entanglement" in Syria must be some real progress that "we" have been making among the brain dead goyim.  But quick, check your own underpants for WMDs!!!  Find anything? Isn't the war on terror in there!  But never, ever, check on some of your "allies in the region" to see if they have WMDs in their underpants.

Seriously, guys.  You have to look at Bill Kristol with your eyes open.  They have to have Team America police the world and cannot be "isolationists."  At least you can all get along and stop calling each other terrorists when it comes to Zionism, I guess...  given your beliefs. 

Too bad they didn't establish Zion in Texas.  Then you could all get along and be non-interventionists avoiding foreign entanglements too:
A project that had some concrete success was the Galveston scheme which contemplated the settlement of Jews in the American Southwest, in particular in Texas. The project received the assistance of Jacob Schiff, the American Jewish banker, and some 9,300 Jews arrived in that area between 1907-1914, through the Emigration Bureau of the Territorialist organization.
   With the publication of the Balfour Declaration, the ITO faced a severe crisis....  (Zionist Congress:
The Uganda Proposal
(August 26, 1903))
  And there might even be a great big wall on the border and less support from the so-called "Jewish Left" for illegal immigration among the goyim too.     

Ramble 12/16

Meanwhile, the corporate media in America:
The white New York City police officer whose choke hold led to the death of an unarmed black man has been sued three times for allegedly violating the constitutional rights of other blacks he and fellow cops arrested.  USA Today
Same old, same old.  No word yet on when they're going to report all the stories of "teens" as "Black teens killed yet another unarmed white girl..."  or "Black men, robbed and killed an unarmed white man..." or "Black cop, killed an unarmed white man..."  Etc.etc.

I was reading your links and came across that.  Did you get that link from Facebook?

  Anyway, ironically the minority/tribal/Jewish politics (euphemism: "identity politics") that pervade the corporate media in America tend to split resistance to the progressively growing police state of the bankers that essentially own the American multicult these days.  Note how useless most forms of resistance have been so far.  Occupy wandered around occupying space... and unlike Iceland they ultimately didn't do much.  So now as far as I know, all Americans have now been incorporated in quadrillions in derivatives denominated in "federal reserve notes" as their overseers (e.g., Chris Coons) continue to borrow debt/money into existence out of nothing from bankers in order to finance more debt/money into existence. 

Meanwhile Fergadishu rioted, looted, burned down their own neighborhood (With help from outside but they did it too.) and got squashed by the multicult mercenaries of the police state.  They didn't actually do anything significant about their status as peasants and now as more businesses leave they're probably going to be even more of a Third World region of the US than they already were.  They may even need some loans from the IMF soon... and then get IMF'd.  

I'm called a "conspiracy theorist" (That's a badge of honor these days.. as far as I'm concerned.) for pointing at bankers and "the financial system" but YOU keep on building or allowing these systems.  You peasants are generally the multicult problem too.  You, Issa.  You, Moseley.  Etc.

It's you.  It's usually you overdosing on the hopium on the one side or trying to wage a "war on drugs" on the other.   Perhaps the coup de grâce will be when there's a "first female president" to put you all out of your misery based primarily on the tribal minority politics that the majority of American peasants seem to love.

It's probably not even the minority that have given up on universalist American "melting pot" traditions in favor of marginal/minority politics* and Jewish tribalism.  They're the majority, not the minority.  They are the bullies, not the victims.  They are the political leaders with power, not the powerless.  Down at the peasant level it's a "minority" that is engaged in black mob violence and murder now.  They are not being lynched based on white mob violence, as in some regions in the past.  This is here.  This is now.  It's easy to romanticize the past, cue the violins and call Steven Spielberg to make a movie.  But it's not as easy to look at reality here and now.  Or for that matter, the actual details of it all as far as which tribes and oligarchs benefited from racism back then either.  You STILL haven't built a Slave Memorial despite all your gibberish about how important your identity/marginal politics supposedly are, yet there was plenty of money for a Holocaust Memorial thanks to its fusion with ethnic pride and atrocity propaganda for the goyim.

But all forms of tribalism aside... what are the facts based on a universalist perspective based on documented facts, logic and evidence?   What type of monument actually makes sense for Americans?  (And Nobody was writing about reparations?????  Seriously.  For all the marginal/minority politics in the world created by a different tribe in their own interests, they can't even get a monument built.  They'll probably be paid reparations for slavery when "federal reserve notes" are about to go to zero in terms of real value.  Don't like my sarcasm? Stop being stupid, that's my message to both white and black goyim.  Focus.  Be a father to your own tribe, otherwise of course you're going to wind up degraded and emasculated as your civilization falls apart and the American Empire begins to break apart.  You can't have "civil rights" without civilization.) 

"Any support of human rights in general by Jews," says Israel Shahak, "which does not include the support of human rights of non-Jews whose rights are being violated by [Israel] is deceitful ... [Jewish] support of Blacks in the South was motivated only by consideration of Jewish self-interest." [SHAHAK, p. 103] "The major role [that Jews] once played in the civil rights movement," says Charles Liebman and Stephen Cohen, "[is a] myth ... [that] enhances the self-image of a Jew as a caring and sensitive minority selflessly contributing to improve the lot of other minorities." [LIEBMAN/COHEN, p. 17] ....
    For years W.E.B. DuBois was the only Black officer in the NAACP, which was largely directed, funded, and controlled in its early decades by Jews like Henry Moskowitz and Joel Spingarn. [ARSON, p. 140] (In 1913 Spingarn announced a yearly award named after himself, the "Spingarn Medal," for the "highest and noblest achievement of an American Negro." [DINER, p. 138] ) In a later era, and another Black organization, the Southern Leadership Christian Conference, a Jew -- Stanley Levison -- even wrote Martin Luther King's speeches for him. [MARTIN, p. 132] Levison has been described as one of King's "closest personal advisers." [KAUFMAN, J., 1988, p. 66] This voice of "Christian Leadership," Levison, was also discovered by the FBI to have been a former Communist party member. [KAUFMAN, J., p. 66] Another Jew, Marvin Rich, was the "chief fundraiser and key speech writer for the Congress of Racial Equality -- CORE", [GINZBURG, p. 145]       Google:  "Jewish Dominance and Exploitation of the Black Civil Rights Movement"  
  It's the majority of Americans that have been caught up in the fake, tribal "civil rights" movement typical to Labor Zionists.  (Jack Markell, Rahm Immanuel, etc.)  And this is as Rahm "served in the IDF" Immanuel lights a huge Menorah with "goyim emanate from Satanic spheres" Chabad with nary a peep about the separation of church and state from "the Left" in America.     

It's fake.  It's lies.  It's been based on a culture of tribalism and deceit to the point that some Jews apparently don't even know they're lying anymore.  It's like asking Donald Sterling about racism.  He knows not what he does. 

There are more than a few that probably honestly think it's about pooping rainbows.  There were Jews that died believing that they were helping to create rainbows.   So at least there is that.  But there is no pot of gold that everyone will get on the other side of the rainbow of the minority/identity politics that they're often trying to police.  You're more likely to get a club to the head from the multicult police forces necessary to police your multicult of tribalism while you're monetized by the (rather none "multicultural") Tribe Inc. and shabat goyim like Joe Biden. 

And that's all.

Oh, dumb multicultural goyim of Israel...  these are my lamentations for you.

Shrug.  ;-)