Wednesday, October 22, 2014

Just realized that this isn't really worth it because brains seem to shut down or go tribal when one so much as says "They're Jewish." Lol. So... putting it here.

Second, I did not realize until yesterday that Dr. Frieden is a political hack appointed by Obama. I assumed, like most people, that he is a career medical expert that rose through the ranks at the CDC. False. Dr Frieden is an ideologue appointed by Obama after an embarrassing stint under Mayor Bloomberg in NYC.

You cannot say this but I can.  Not only are Bloomberg/Frieden/Klein Jewish, they also tend toward the Jewish perspective that no borders can be allowed for the goyim/tribes.  (Aka known as the wretched refuse according to Emma Lazarus...  yet the goyim celebrate that.  Supposedly she didn't really mean that people were like trash, I guess.) 

I'm not sure if they're hypocrites.  People often do not really think about their own cultures.  Here we go again, huh? As if it's my fault that a culture of tribalism, ethnocentrism and nepotism has negative effects on the American government or is often an aspect of the so-called news in America, from Lois "I didn't discriminate against Christian nationalists." Lerner to Donald"I'm not a racist." Sterling.

Whatever being Jewish means to anyone that falsely perceives themselves as members of an international tribe that transcends borders and all the forms of nationalism and tribalism of the goyim/tribes...  it's an angle on stories and the news.  It's a perspective.

It's also the lens through which you're often seeing the so-called news as it merges with other forms of entertainment (Jon Stewart, Bill Maher). Not that there's anything wrong with that, except when there is.  For example, well... never mind, it's not worth it.  Enjoy your favorite forms of entertainment, as the show must go on! 

On a side note, that Mason that comments here is probably correct in some ways.  Not that I have much use for secret societies of Sion, etc.  But at least those full of engineers and inventors at a base level (Having fun with geometry and so on, ooga booga...) often seem interested in finding solutions to actual problems in what most people perceive as the "real" or physical world.

Perceptions vary.  In this case, perceptions about what the problem is vary: 
Pianka's acceptance speech for the 2006 Distinguished Texas Scientist Award from the Texas Academy of Science resulted in a controversy in the popular press when Forrest Mims, vice-chair of the Academy's section on environmental science, claimed in the Society for Amateur Scientists e-journal The Citizen Scientist that Pianka had "endorsed the elimination of 95 percent of the human population" through a disease such as an airborne strain of the Ebola virus.   Mims claimed that Pianka said the Earth would not survive unless its population was reduced by 95% suggesting that the planet would be "better off" if the human population were reduced and that a mutant strain of Ebola would be the most efficient means.   ....
 Dr. Kenneth Summy,[19] an Academy member who observed the speech, wrote a letter[20] of support for Mims' account, saying "Dr. Pianka chose to deliver an inflammatory message in his keynote address, so he should not be surprised to be the recipient of a lot of criticism from TAS membership. Forrest Mims did not misrepresent anything regarding the presentation."  ....
As a consequence of the controversy, Pianka and members of the Texas Academy of Science have received death threats.   According to Pianka, his daughters are now worried about his and their safety, and his life has been "turned upside-down by 'right-wing fools'."  --Wikipedia
  Lol.  Turns out he does care about human life, huh?

It's not a "death threat" when you say, "Well, Ebola will probably bring about balance in nature... I'm not saying that we should work for the military industrial complex to weaponize it and target certain genomes.  I'm just saying, it's bound to happen naturally anyway... or somethin'."  Etc. 

But it is a death threat when you say, "Fine, I'm going to form an informal conference to debate the topic of killing you and your family as a threat to my own.  We're just evolving randomly and forming little academic conferences based on natural selection to debate the nature of your death.  Don't worry.  Official sources.  Official studies.  I just peer reviewed and certified this other guy from scientists.gov here.  Nothing to see, move along..."  Etc.

Not only do perspectives vary...  apparently they change a lot when the nature of a "death threat" is turned around on those that fancy themselves as elites. (Or the chosen race.... etc., they have their own versions.  I think it was PNAC factions that were debating biological weapons to target genomes.  Fact is, they can't even pull off so much as an anthrax attack without bungling it.  But I know, none of you can admit that the follow up to 911 was utterly bungled.  "Here's some CIPRO, oops."  Etc.)

"... the art of warfare ... will be vastly different than it is today ... 'combat' likely will take place in new dimensions ... advanced forms of biological warfare that can 'target' specific genotypes may transform biological warfare from the realm of terror to a politically useful tool" (PNAC, 2000).
  A more humorous and less sinister version of that idea:
Almost sixty years ago, the US developed a nauseating 'bathroom odor' chemical for use as a weapon. But according to the Army, the old malodorant will not work outside of the US and Western Europe, because "it was found that people in many areas of the world do not find 'fecal odor' to be offensive, since they smell it on a regular basis." Therefore, according to the Army, new agents are needed for overseas missions. These new malodorants are to be specifically adapted for their victims. According to a 1998 document: "The objective of this work is the development of a comprehensive set of [malodorants] that can be applied against any population set around the world to influence their behavior." (See the source of this and other quotes [PDF].) ....
 A group of subjects selected "based on a diversity of geographic origins and cultural heritage" is systematically exposed to candidate malodorants to develop "culture-response data" based on ethnic categories. That data is aggregated into "odor response profiles" that suggest the types and quantities of malodorants necessary to "elicit a favorable behavioral response" (i.e. incapacitation, panic, or flight) when used for crowd control on a particular ethnic group.
....
The documents generally do not include details about research subjects and how researchers categorize them. Some experiments have been conducted outside the United States, or on immigrants. A February 2000 draft report refers to testing on "a group of South Africans" (See this page of the report).
  This is the loony toons type stuff that scientists.gov* are sometimes into, sometimes with nary a whistle blower in site.  They're almost as bad as Scientists Inc. sometimes.  Anyway... merely Google "The documents generally do not include details about research" or any part of that text to trace it back to the references and documents found through FOIA requests by actual investigative journalists and so on. 

There's no excuse at this point not to be a so-called "truther" or to at least take a look at a so-called "conspiracy theory" angle on everything.  As well as the oligarchic or Zionist angle, given that's often the governing culture of this troupe of clowns and witless wonders running the American government at this point.

Perspectives vary... but the evidence does not.  

Too bad for many Americans, all they want is more freedumb!  More TV.  More corporate media.  More entertainment.

With respect to the "national scene" of the "Sunday Political Talk Shows"....  why are you still watching that crap?  Is it not fairly clear that it's pretty much meaningless, at this point?  You do realize that David "son serves in the IDF" Brooks speaking in a serious voice doesn't really mean much just like Judge Jeanine ranting over at Fox News has her own cultural background, yes?  What are all of their cultural backgrounds and perspectives?  Does it matter that Moseley is a conservative Christian Zionist?   

Of course it does.  If he was producing "news," then that would be the perspective (rather clumsily) forced on it.  Nothing against you Moseley...  sometimes you make a good case if things align with your perspective.  

Point being, it's usually not merely "the national news" that's been "covered" for you after you watch it.  It's often different perspectives on whatever actually really happened.

Tuesday, October 21, 2014

Debating a Jewish supremacist...

  1. mynym:

    They have survived countless persecutions, pogroms, and the greatest mass-murder in History…
    Do you believe that the Holocaust was a sacrifice made by fire of the sacred six million and a right of return to the Promised Land emanated from the smoke? Why do you suppose that six million (And apparently it has to be six, to be a sacred holocaust.) Jews were reported as dying in pogroms long before Hitler came to power?

    It’s a complex world. But I think your supposed “razor” might need to be applied to some of the Jewish stories and tribal mythologies based on sacred numbers that you seem to accept at face value.

    And I must emphasize that anti-Semitism is the purvey of weaker minds. It takes much effort to understand History and its complexities, and that is simply too much for many to employ.

    Seriously?
    Then there’s this:
    ...defining Communism in Russia, and serving the cause of freedom and democracy in the American senate.

    The only way that celebrating the venting of Jewish hatred against the goyim when they “defined Communism in Russia” would make sense is if you adhere to the rabbinic idea that Jewish life is more sacred than the lives of goyim/cattle. Therefore, when they have a sacrifice of the sacred six million (cabala, etc.) that relegates the lives of all the goyim killed in Russia to meaninglessness. The Holodomor doesn’t matter in the light of “the” Holocaust because they were not superior, as you imagine Jews to be.
    But it seems to me that’s as foolish as following along with rabbinic thought to the point of believing in the tribal nature of human sacrifice/holocausts in the first place. And it’s doubtful that many of the Jewish individuals incorporated in rabbinic stories of that nature would agree, anyway. Perhaps a sense of tribal superiority is all well and good, until the tribe decides that you need to be sacrificed while they sign off on the Transfer Agreement with other people that fancy themselves as being the chosen racists of God.
    I don’t get it. How do these Jewish stories about themselves that you’re apparently repeating, even square in your mind? You’re celebrating their prominent role in creating the actual greatest form of mass murder (Communism) in the history of mankind, yet simultaneously want to keep them as eternal victims of the entire (????) world based on the Holocaust?
  2. mynym:

    You may also get “tired” very quickly if we tried to debate. But I’m all for it. Open forums, freedom and all that.
  3. Scott Kirwin:

    Mynym
    33 million died under Stalin’s purges. 100 million Chinese died during Mao’s Great Leap Forward. What is special about the Holocaust is the mechanization of genocide and its systematic application. The detail of the killing machine developed by the Nazis as codified as the Wannsee Conference in 1942 was unprecedented and remains so 70 years later.
    As for Communism my point was that the doctrine shaped world history just as the rise of American capitalism did, and Jews were involved in both. To some that means that fact merely adds to the menace of the Jewish people; to me it just shows they tend to punch above their weight class. As for Communism itself, having used Marx’s Das Kapital as a sleep aid, I can assure you that I am as anti-Communist as the next guy.
    As for Jewish superiority, show me a group that doesn’t feel superior to others.
  4. mynym:

    As for Communism my point was that the doctrine shaped world history just as the rise of American capitalism did, and Jews were involved in both.
    Indeed: Mr. Schiff has always used his wealth and his influence in the best interests of his people. He financed the enemies of autocratic Russia and used his financial influence to keep Russia away from the money market of the United States. Jewish Communal Register of New York City. (1918). p. 1018-1019 Etc.
    To some that means that fact merely adds to the menace of the Jewish people…
    Not really, apparently many that are taught the racial supremacy promoted in the Talmud create secular versions of the same old stuff. So they form ethnic networks no matter which side of the Right/Left paradigm that they let the public/goyim see. Soros is another example, he doesn’t actually do anything significant about the forms of Jewish supremacy, ethnic colonization and segregation practiced in Israel. But apparently there’s always money to be spent on defeating racism among the goyim. Donald Sterling is another example and he honestly doesn’t even get it because “It’s my culture.” What culture?
    ...to me it just shows they tend to punch above their weight class.
    Now you’re back to justifying Jewish supremacy. All of them? Some? Is that because of their race, religion… or a racist religion of tribalism above all others? Who are you talking about?
    As for Communism itself, having used Marx’s Das Kapital as a sleep aid, I can assure you that I am as anti-Communist as the next guy.
    That’s fine. Ironically the people that created Communism probably wouldn’t really care if you’re anti-Communist. As I recall, Moses Hess himself predicted that it would be discarded in favor of Zionism or an open form of Jewish supremacy. What they really tend to care about, is that you keep on believing in their national/tribal myths based on human sacrifice and that you keep on arguing that they’re superior to the goyim. As their traditions and their secular versions of the same old things tends to teach.
    As for Jewish superiority, show me a group that doesn’t feel superior to others.
    That’s true. But show me another group that you will argue is superior to others.
    It would seem that you are the evidence. But it really depends on what you count as superior. Even if you’re arguing that they’re more intelligent and not just hypocrites working as a tribe to forbid racism and ethnocentrism* to all the goyim while practicing it themselves, what if integrity was more important than greater intelligence that you seem to be imagining that they have?
    *E.g… “Give America the tired, the poor… the wretched refuse, just a bunch of trash that wants to be free. Just send the trash over there. But give me my own, ethnic and tribal state!” paraphrasing Emma Lazarus “All these goy need to learn how to integrate so let’s help create the NAACP! But, uh, our own tribal culture is fine. Also, we forbid interracial marriage.” Or whoever that Washington Post guy was recently: “Interracial marriage, that must make American goyim sick! Uh, wait… I guess it only makes me sick because I come from a culture of racial supremacy.” Etc. I could look all the examples up and document them. Because as Max Blumenthal might say of the way similar attitudes have been institutionalized in Israel, these are artifact of a rather “peculiar” culture and perspective on the world and the tribes/goyim of the world.
  5. mynym:

    By the way, I am not a holocaust denier. Debating a Holocaust Denier
    But I do deny the rabbinic framework by which atrocities committed in a World War are perceived as a form of human sacrifice, made by fire, that justify the creation of a state that was already forming due to the Transfer Agreement among those that perceived themselves as the chosen racists of Evolution and many that perceived themselves as the chosen racists of God. (Or failing God, back to evolution again…)
  6. Sara Noble:

    Blame the UN and the British if you don’t like Israel. Israelis took a desert that was no one’s state and made it into something special. They protect the Christian and Muslim holy land. Look at what’s around them. Would you rather Israel go back to the rathole it was – that’s rhetorical
    What’s wrong with Jews thinking they are exceptional and striving to live up to that standard? You obviously think you’re exceptional.
    I think you’re argument is against liberal ideology not Jews. Put that anger where it belongs – against the hateful ideologies destroying our Republic – your focus is askew.
  7. mynym:

    I thought the Zionists tried to bomb and false flag the British in the Lavon Affair and so on while they were in the process of ethnically cleansing people to establish a “Jewish State.” It’s nothing special, states have often been formed based on terrorism. And if you have the power of a hegemonic Empire at your disposal as well as the ability to take over the water supplies and so on, then it’s easy to play pretend about pooping out gardens in deserts. When in fact, goyim could also do that.
    Talmudists spit on Christians in the holy land while rabbis write tracts about how best to keep the slaughter of Muslim goyim kosher. What’s around them isn’t any better. Although people living in a Talmudic/rabbinic type of culture would create the same or perhaps a worse type of civilization than others if they were not propped up by the American Empire. (E.g., the Soviet experience with a totalitarian culture of legalism, centralized power, secular versions of rabbinic bureaucracies, the issue of Tribe/Party membership, etc.) Much of what you think of as liberalism or being “politically” correct was created by the Frankfurt School in order to degrade and dominate the goyim based on identity politics and the tribalism that they understood so well. Not that they see it that way. After all, they are merely defending themselves from the dangerous and utterly randomly “antisemitic” goyim. Because degrading and monetizing people (lend to the goyim at interest,etc.) or justifying racial and tribal supremacy is not the reason that people, all around the world and throughout the centuries usually get upset with Jews. No, that’s not it. It couldn’t be Jewish behavior, cultivated by the Talmud and secular versions (“We’re more intelligent. We’re pooping gardens here.”) of the same type of racial supremacy. So it comes from the ether. So the goyim need a Talmudic psychologist like Freud to tell them what’s wrong with them, it would seem.
    You obviously think you’re exceptional.
    Why do you say that?
    Would you all defend me as exceptional and supposedly superior, to the same extent that you seem intent on arguing that Jews are special? Look at some of your apparent arguments again. Correct me if I’m wrong but: “The Holocaust is special and different from all the other mass murder that’s gone on in the world because it was mechanized. So I haven’t actually absorbed a rabbinic form of racial supremacy from my culture by osmosis.” Or “Jews took a desert and pooped out some gardens there, therefore they’re special.”
    And now, apparently: “Well, don’t you think that you’re special? So they get to think that they’re special too.”
    Even if that were the case and I’m not sure it is. There would still be a large difference between me and Jews that pose on both the Right and the Left. I do not propose multiculturalism for the goyim/tribes (the trash, from some Jewish perspectives) or support open borders for the goyim and closed borders for Jews in a “Jewish State” to the same extent that they have. I’d like to think that I couldn’t be that hypocritical. I could be wrong. If you believe that the entire world (the goyim/tribes) is basically out to get you (the Jew, the chosen tribe) for no reason then it’s probably possible to come to some rather peculiar and hypocritical conclusions. After all, you can’t conclude that your own behavior has anything to do with it, so you’d be left with trying to manipulate and police the goyim/world. (Whether as a Soviet killing millions by starvation in the Holodomor… or a neocon or a neoliberal like Madeline Albright saying that the deaths by starvation of 500,000 Iraqi children was “worth it.”)
  8. mynym:

    Blame the UN and the British if you don’t like Israel.
    This might be simpler. What do any of you actually blame Israelis and Jews for? Not the UN or the British, etc… even if there is plenty of blame to go around.
    Because blaming and yes, “scapegoating” the world/goyim for pretty much everything while refusing to blame Jews for anything (E.g. the role of their ethnic hatred and international culture and tribal networks in Communism.) may be something that you’ve absorbed from a culture of Jewish supremacy by osmosis.
    Why do I write “Jewish supremacy”? Look above and reread some of your own arguments… and there’s the evidence, right here.
  9. Rob Miller:

    Ah, what we have here is a sophisticated Jew hater! His schtick is more interesting than most, because it is addressed to non-Jews who admire Jews and based on the supposed ‘contempt’ Jews have for non-Jews.What he has is a monomania, where every issue can be explained by The EEEEVIL JOOOOS.
    But do you think you’re unique, and that I haven’t seen cute lil’ snowflakes like you before? Your type goes back to Haman, lying to the Persian King about that ‘alien people’ who ‘think themselves superior and do not respect you or your laws.’
    I also admire (to a point) the trick of imputing to people beliefs they don’t have and attacking those beliefs. Slick!
    I could certainly prove that Israel didn’t engage in wholesale ethnic cleansing, that it has a firm basis in international law including Judea and Samaria, that Israel is the only country in the Middle East where the Christian population is growing and their beliefs are respected. But why bother? Why should I feel any need to apologize for Jewish survival and success to a warped individual like you? I’m only here now because someone requested me to weigh in, and maybe some of the others haven’t smelled your particular kind of stench before.
    You even bring in Madeline Albright, a woman who was born a Jew but was never aware of it and whom was raised Catholic all her life as a proof of ‘Jewish’ perfidy.And she’s no friend of Israel, btw.
    Gang, it’s actually useless to debate someone like this. In this deconstructionist age, people make up their own facts, and there are endless ‘sources’ to draw on simply because there’s money and notoriety in it. To paraphrase the old saying, bullsh*t not only talks but walks these days.
    Now here’s an interesting question for this bigot. Why do you feel so threatened by Jewish success and survival? Jews getting into your peanut butter sandwiches lately?
    Israel stays. Deal with it.
  10. mynym:

    ...it is addressed to non-Jews who admire Jews and based on the supposed ‘contempt’ Jews have for non-Jews.
    Some do, some do not… but most people that follow rabbinic thinking and secular versions of Jewish supremacy do have contempt for the goyim. Google: “not worth a Jewish fingernail” “sit like effendi and eat” “emanate from Satanic spheres” and so on.
    What he has is a monomania, where every issue can be explained by The EEEEVIL JOOOOS.
    Not really.
    Your type goes back to Haman, lying to the Persian King about that ‘alien people’ who ‘think themselves superior and do not respect you or your laws.’
    Look at Jewish culture again, apparently they are prone to preemptively murdering people based on conspiracy theories and their racist knowledge of what type of people the goyim are. These days, apparently they generally want to kill or dominate Persians again based on preemptively murdering people. On a side note, people can Google a recipe for mock cannibalism and Haman’s ears: (Hamantashen (Haman’s Ears) Cookie Recipe | SparkRecipes) (Eating Jewish: Oznei Haman (Haman’s Ears) | Jewish …), etc.
    That is as silly as believing in the virtues of human sacrifice based on cabala and trying to put goyim in jail for criticizing tribal mythologies.
    I also admire (to a point) the trick of imputing to people beliefs they don’t have and attacking those beliefs. Slick!
    Next you’ll be saying that Haman’s ears and celebrating Purim are antisemitic conspiracy theories. It gets a little ridiculous. Seriously. How did babies wind up with herpes thanks to Jewish rabbis? That’s just another antisemitic conspiracy theory about Jewish blood rituals… no doubt. Google: “rabbis, herpes” And then they’re off to engage in mock cannibalism, apparently. One would think that people supposedly superior and more intelligent than everyone would come up with better forms of culture than this.
    ... Israel is the only country in the Middle East where the Christian population is growing and their beliefs are respected.
    Google: “Israelis, spitting” (Christians in Jerusalem want Jews to stop spitting on them) Etc.
    You even bring in Madeline Albright, a woman who was born a Jew but was never aware of it and whom was raised Catholic…
    Rules and perceptions about tribal beliefs tend to vary, look at the original post, it’s not clear what the rules are. Google: “Cohen, not Jewish enough”
    In this deconstructionist age, people make up their own facts, and there are endless ‘sources’ to draw…
    Mainly because people are celebrating eating Haman’s ears based on the preemptive murder of perceived enemies of the tribe based on conspiracy theories, etc. People are beginning to leave an electronic footprint for everything that they do. The fact that Jewish blood rituals and national myths and their murderous attitude toward perceived enemies and so on is now leaving electronic footprints has little to do with some new ability to supposedly “make up facts.” The facts are what they are.
    Now here’s an interesting question for this bigot. Why do you feel so threatened by Jewish success and survival?
    I don’t. That seems to be projection. The success of Jews like Einstein, Israel Shahak, Norman Finkelstein, Max Blumenthal and others that do not seem to be into racism and tribalism to the same extent as anyone that takes the national myth of Haman seriously do not threaten the goyim. But there are others, like the racial supremacists of Chabad, that are a threat.
    Jews getting into your peanut butter sandwiches lately?
    Perhaps you should create a new tradition in which you shape the peanut butter like ears and imagine that they are mine?
    Israel stays. Deal with it.
    Shrug. I wonder if the “Jewish State” will stay. Or if it should stay as some sort of peculiar ethnocracy or religious state… anymore than an “Islamic State” or a “Christian State” should be formed.
    It is curious the way the so-called New Atheists and say, Sam Harris and Bill Maher will endlessly mock religion. Yet they have little to say about rabbinic traditions and the Jewish religion. But as far as Bill Maher goes, I guess babies with herpes isn’t a joke. Or is it?
    Anyway, with respect to supposedly just making facts up… I must be a powerful Haman to get Google to return the results that it will return based on those searches. So let me know if you ever get around to mock cannibalism and eating my ears, symbolically. Fun times.
  11. Rob Miller:

    I guess I didn’t make myself clear.
    People like you can always find fellow wack jobs who will write anything they can to justify their pathetic existence, get some attention and earn a little coin. I notice you mention some of them in this little screed. You must think you’re the first to throw this lame garbage out there!
    One example,just for giggles – you obviously know zip about Haman, and that had nothing to do with ‘Jewish domination of the Persians’. And the humentashen? Those represent his three cornered hat, not his ears, buffoon. Why else do you think they’re shaped that way?
    Google this, Jew Hater. Obviously you feel threatened by Jewish success, as opposed to your own failure and intellectual bankruptcy. That’s a common psychological reaction, (envy is a root cause of Jew Hatred) and with therapy I think in time you might overcome it, but I’d charge you at least $150 per hour – payable in advance.
    And Israel’s survival? So far, they’ve managed pretty well when the odds were a lot worse than they are today. That in itself ought to tell you something about G-d’s intentions, but of course a brilliant guy like you knows better. Enjoy watching the Jewish Nation thrive. I hope it makes you even crazier than you are now.
    And here’s something else you can Google. I have no interest in apologizing for or ‘debating’ Jewish success and survival. It speaks for itself.Read that again and take notes.
    I don’t care what you think, have no interest in convincing you of anything, and really don’t care whether you wake up in the morning. You mean nothing to me.

Thursday, October 09, 2014

Ramble 10/9

Women killing their own children and drugging their boys while fighting with men and so on could be said to be a "war."  But there is no war on Western women.  Politicians ineptly trying to say that they shouldn't kill their babies or the "infant"ry that an equally trendy Right wants to send to war later?? 

That's not a war.  It's a political game.   

A war, is war. 

Seriously.  The only equality there seems to be in a mirage made in hell or a nation based on divorce, is the fact that men and women are tending toward equally murderous attitudes with respect to the least of these. (Whether around the world or in their own womb.)   But they frame it as something heroic, whether it's incorporating abortion in "civil rights" or supposedly bringing freedumb (aka a proxy government of nation destroyers) to weaker nations in the world by bombing their infrastructure.  If the Right is not full of heroes saving the world by bringing it "freedom and democracy," then what is it full of?  If the Left is actually not engaged in a grand struggle for "civil rights" to help the poor, then what is it usually actually engaged in? 

Call me a cynic.  But it seems like the Right is full of mercenaries serving an oligarchy (evolving into the military wing of a global government of international interests and Oligarchs Inc.)that does not even pay them very well.  Supposedly they cannot even get enough ponzi from bankers to keep their open air war memorials open.  After all, "You didn't build that."  And, most likely: "You didn't die for that."  But bankers, globalists and foreigners need to be bailed out or you need to go to war for them.  Etc.etc.  More rambling. 

Meanwhile, much of the Leftist or "sex in the city" vote that Obama Inc. marketed the "war on women" to with help from trendies in the media amounts to someone that killed their own child in the hopes of profiting economically or socially for themselves.  And they probably didn't even get what they thought they would get out of it.  A college education that makes all that student loan debt/money worthwhile?  Even if they supposedly "get ahead" in life by killing their own babies, they probably just signed a mortgage based on fractional reserve lending and usury that loots their wealth and keeps them behind anyway.  Then there are all the other aspects of banksterism and the currency by which their supposed socioeconomic success after they got an abortion in order to complete college is denominated.  So did they really need to kill their own child in order to maintain their career path or whatever else?  Not enough ponzi to care?  Is that really it, given that in a culture trending against men, women can choose to kill or force them to pay?  Do they have "enough" now... after killing some of their children? 

Is there ever enough or do you have to authentically care about other people...  and then there's enough?  There are happy people with children, living in huts.  There are unhappy people about to kill themselves, driving nice cares and living in Mc Mansions.  Why is that?     

And so on.  Only one thing seems certain, nothing is as it seems when people are engaged in "perceptions management."*  More entertainment. Call me names or call me a cynic for not accepting things at face value...  it seems to me that I'm merely trying to observe what's actually happening based on healthy skepticism and facts, logic  and evidence.   Although I'm beginning to wonder if trying to seek the truth based on actual evidence is generally the equivalent of cynicism.  So in that way, perhaps you can call me cynical.    

*Perceptions management... where War Inc. marketed to men turns into Captain America type stuff until they get their limbs blown off fighting for the interests of oligarchies, in reality.  And the abortion industry marketed to women turns into a grand struggle for civil rights unless they realize that they just had their own baby torn limb from limb.  Little wonder that so many are so fervent about contributing to Planned Parenthood or joining movements led by secular versions of "revolutionary" Talmudism (Friedan/Steinen/Goldstein/Guttmacher*, etc.) and any politician willing to play pretend that abortion is all about a grand struggle for civil rights based on identity politics and tribalism.  (When the male tribe is being set against the female tribe, then you've gone too far with all that.  Or with sitting back and allowing Jewish/tribal media to be created so that you see your own culture in that way because you're to scared to say the word:  "Jew." ) 

*A sample:
....they [the female tribe] could change society from the bottom up by radicalizing (engaging with basic truth [Seen from her perspective.]) the [tribal] consciousness of women; by going into the streets on such [tribal] women’s issues as abortion, free childcare centers, and a final break with the 19th century definition of women as sex objects whose main function is to service men and their children. Google: NYMag, Steinem
  Really.  And was the supposed tribal "consciousness" of women being raised by Jews like Friedman/Steinem and whoever based on the viciously tribal mentalities typical to their identity politics meant to apply to the goyim... or everyone?  Because if the usual rabbinic "radical" believed in their revolutions in a universal way then the Jewish Bolsheviks would have focused on banksterism instead of having their ethnic compatriots finance their revolution.  I.e. they wouldn't have used "capitalism" as an excuse for yet another tribal, revolutionary movement emerging from the bowels of the body politic.  And Steinem would focus on those buses in Israel where women have to sit at the back instead of trying to police the goyim. Etc.  Maybe she did at some point, I don't know.  But they usually do not remove the log before going for the speck in the eye of the goyim.  (Of course, the speck is actually there.  But it's not worth having your eyes gouged out by standing back and letting someone with huge logs in their own eyes try to remove it)    

Not sure why this is the cultural lens or "media" that Americans see themselves through.  Apathy.  Too scared. 

Rambling.  But years ago you were threatening to call the ADL on each other or something like that.  (An organization that amounts to a tribal spy agency.  They recently got in trouble with the Ukraine "false flag" situation.  Oops.  Not that it matters to the willfully clueless and scared.)

In retrospect, that's amusing.  Call them up again.  I have a few questions for them.  If you're not on the ADL/DHS Soviet type lists as a possible threat to their Party/Tribe yet, then you're probably useless.

Wednesday, October 08, 2014

Tangents 10/8

I wonder if feminists have an opinion on the Russian army (another revolution led by Jews, great) raping German women after Talmudists were done with helping to incite a race war there?  (While signing off on the Transfer Agreement with other racists in the background...)  

 Americans were slightly better:
According to the International News Service in London, January 31, 1946, when American soldier's wives were brought to Germany, they were given special authorization to wear military uniforms because "the GIs did not want their wives mistaken for Fraeuleins by other occupation troops." A writer for the New York World Telegram January 21, 1945 stated "Americans look on the German women as loot, just like cameras and Lugers." Dr. G. Stewart, in a health statement submitted to General Eisenhower, reported that in the first six months of American occupation, venereal disease jumped to twenty times its former level in Germany.
   I want you imagine an orgy of rape like this happening in your country, in your neighborhood, to your family, to your wife, your sister, your daughter. I want you to imagine what it would feel like to be totally powerless to stop it from happening, completely unable to bring the criminals to justice. And I want to ask you, were there ever any "war crimes" or "hate crimes" trials of these butchers and rapists and inciters to butchery and rape?
....
    Few today remember that in the 1940s, the Allies, who even then were calling their world-government-in-the-making the "United Nations," were pursuing a policy of unconditional surrender, which meant that the Germans would be obligated to accept an occupation government whose announced intentions, the infamous and genocidal Morgenthau Plan, would have reduced Germany to medieval conditions and cut her population by enforced starvation. Go to a large library and check out Secretary Morgenthau's book, Germany Is Our Problem, Harper and Brothers, 1945. You will note the use of the term "United Nations" on the front flyleaf and in the foreword by Franklin D. Roosevelt. A prominent Jewish writer in America, Theodore Kaufman, had in 1941 written a book entitled Germany Must Perish, which advocated the extermination of all Germans by sterilization. Kaufman's book received favorable reviews in major American magazines and newspapers. Other books, such as Louis Nizer's What To Do With Germany, also contributed to this atmosphere of strident anti-German hatred. War propaganda and official policy combined to create an image of the German as sub-human and deserving of almost infinite punishment if not annihilation.
("Ravishing the Women of Conquered Europe" by
Kevin Alfred Strom)
  But what are brain dead goyim trendies in a  movement of "women's rights" created by Jews and formed around abortion by Steinen/Goldstein/Friedman/Guttmacher and the like concerned with?  

Arguing that a kiss is rape, apparently? 

These aren't serious minded people.  There again,  most people here probably are not either...   

For instance, it's likely that most here have to believe that WWII was the "good war" (Thus every war or kinetic action is about "another Hitler"...) and that all the Allies were probably Captain America or Superman, etc.  So I should have only mentioned the absolutely abysmal track record of the Russians stirred to "revolution" by Jewish leaders and thereby let your cultural conceits with respect to what actually happens in wars remain undisturbed. 

I guess I'm pretending that you're all grown ups more interested in reality and lines of historical evidence than in nationalism, tribalism, Zionism and comic books.

More rambling 10/8

Juxtapose the end of the usual revolutionary tendencies of gay activists in America:
Hay and Burnside returned to San Francisco in 1999 after concluding that Hay was not receiving proper care in Los Angeles for his serious health concerns, including pneumonia and lung cancer. He served as the grand marshal of the San Francisco gay pride parade that same year. While in hospice care Hay died of lung cancer on October 24, 2002 at age 90. Ib.
Died of old age... only in America, due to a balanced form of civilization. Contrast with other gay revolutionaries:
Under Röhm, the SA also often took the side of workers in strikes and other labor disputes, attacking strikebreakers and supporting picket lines. SA intimidation contributed to the rise of the Nazis and the violent suppression of left-wing parties during electoral campaigns, but its reputation for street violence and heavy drinking was a hindrance, as was the open homosexuality of Röhm and other SA leaders such as his deputy Edmund Heines.[5][6] One American journalist would later write, "[Röhm's] chiefs, men of the rank of Gruppenfuehrer or Obergruppenfuehrer, commanding units of several hundred thousand Storm Troopers, were almost without exception homosexuals."[7] In 1931, the Münchener Post, a Social Democratic newspaper, obtained and published Röhm's letters to a friend discussing his homosexual affairs.
Röhm with Hitler, August 1933
   Hitler was aware of Röhm's homosexuality. At this point they were so close that they addressed each other as du (the German familiar form of "you"). No other top Nazi leader enjoyed that privilege, and their close association led to rumors that Hitler himself was homosexual.[7] Röhm was the only Nazi leader who dared to address Hitler by his first name "Adolf" rather than "mein Führer."[6]  .....
Hitler was hesitant in authorizing Röhm's execution, and gave him the option of suicide. On 1 July, SS-Brigadeführer Theodor Eicke (then Kommandant of the Dachau concentration camp) and SS-Obersturmbannführer Michael Lippert walked into his cell, laid a pistol on the table, told Röhm he had ten minutes to use it and left. He refused, stating, "If I am to be killed, let Adolf do it himself."[11] Having heard nothing after the stipulated ten minutes, Eicke and Lippert returned to Röhm's cell to find him standing with his bare chest puffed out in a gesture of defiance, and Lippert shot him in the chest at point-blank range.[12] --Wikipedia
  It's likely that if Hay had been more successful in his revolting (supported NAMBLA for the usual reasons) revolution against American values and civilization then he would have died earlier.

Although to a less extreme extent, the same thing still applies to these clueless trendies of Western pop culture and their so-called "first gay" entertainer in chief now.   

Because when people with close to zero respect for the Creator and natural law become too influential, they enable the tyrants and tyranny that destroys them or their civil rights.  You can't have civil rights without civilization.