Saturday, August 29, 2015

Ramble 8/29


At any rate, it's curious that a "Hispanic" vote exists when ethnic groups supposedly don't exist at all in the first place. 

But given that many ethnic activists (anyone from Arab groups/CAIR to the Jewish Federation) are just engaged in anti-White propaganda for the sake of their own groups, all that really means is that White people don't even exist as a group. 

Little wonder that they're being ethnically replaced in their own countries all around the world.  No word yet on when China and Japan will need more diversity... due to their racism and wars in the past... or whatever.  Pretexts vary!  You know what group isn't really there agitating the Japanese or influential in more ethno/racially homogeneous countries?  There's your answer.  Duh.   Although they did arrange to have a biracial Japanese beauty queen recently. 

More entertainment.

Never mind the cost of the show... or the fact that it will ultimately turn out that it doesn't even make sense to have a "Japanese" beauty queen once their identity and heritage as "the Japanese" has been melted away.

See:
(Biracial Beauty Queen Challenges Japan's Self-Image - The ...  NYT)

Etc.

The usual.  It's like a blob heading toward you.  But if you poke at it or even joke about it, "Oy vey!  Cue the violins!! Censor, arrest them!"

But if you don't poke at it, then you may no longer have a natural right to exist as a group of people or to have freedom of association to continue existing as an ethno/racial group. 

Personally, I joke about it.  Note that the people creating this mess will try to arrest more people for "hate speech" though.  

Friday, August 28, 2015

Looks like the Jew Wolfgang von Baumgart over at Delware Politics finally couldn't keep himself in check. Just a guess. Just a stereotype!

Nobody would let the Jewish refugees from Germany in.

What an idiot.  Just, idiotic.

There was a Zionist lobby that wanted Jews to go to Israel, then as now.  So they wouldn't let them in.

THAT”s how much influence the Jews had over the Allied nations…. NONE.

Little wonder that the Jews laugh at the dumb goyim to this day.

There is no global conspiracy that's always fully articulated.  There is only the tribalism that "Zionism" is becoming a lightening rod for. 

So it's likely that even the dumbest of the freedumb fries eating goyim will know more about the Jews and what they've been doing as a group soon enough.

"We're victims, again!"

You're victims of your own tribal lobbies and your own nationalists that signed off on the Transfer Agreement with Nazis while working against letting Jewish refugees come to the West?

Well, cue the violins!
  

Wednesday, August 26, 2015

TV Reporter Murdered Live On Air

Meh, I have to go... ramble, 8/26

The Socialist-Democrats won’t be able to do to Hispanics what they did to blacks.

Where is there evidence of that?

Regardless of the politics, the results are usually catastrophic:  
AMERICANS SEEM TO BE UNDER THE MISIMPRESSION THEY DON’T HAVE A country at all, but rather live in something like the international waiting room at JFK Airport. America is not a “nation of immigrants,” it is not an “idea,” it was never “diverse,” and “diversity” is a catastrophe.

 If America were an “idea,” every country on earth could be America. Electricity is an idea. The airplane is an idea. Washing with soap is an idea. That’s why other countries have been able to adopt those innovations. No other country on earth has been able to approximate America— except our fellow Anglo-Saxon nations.  Why is that? We’ve been dropping enormous hints to the rest of the world for centuries. America is not a mere landmass— otherwise, the Indians would have written the Declaration of Independence and put a man on the moon. Far from discovering America, Indians didn’t even detect America. There was no America until the British and Dutch arrived. They were not “immigrants” because there was no established society for them to move to. Without the white settlers, what is known as “America” would still be an unnamed continent full of migratory tribes chasing the rear end of a buffalo every time their stomachs growled.
....
For one hundred years before the signing of the Declaration, and one hundred years after, America was extraordinarily un-diverse in ethnicity (British, Dutch, West African, and Germanic), in religious practice (overwhelmingly Protestant, 98 percent Christian), in language (English), and in cultural mores (no wailing at funerals or child rape). Even the few French settlers in colonial America were Protestants— they had fled France under threat of forced conversion to Catholicism. Pre-Revolutionary America allowed the naturalization of Jews— but not Catholics. 5 Curiously, in contemporary America, Hispanic Protestants are majority Republican, while Hispanic Catholics are nearly monolithically Democrat. Harvard professor Samuel Huntington asks: “Would America be the America it is today if in the 17th and 18th centuries it had been settled not by British Protestants but by French, Spanish, or Portuguese Catholics?” Clearly not: “It would not be America; it would be Quebec, Mexico, or Brazil.” 6 Author Richard Brookhiser writes: “The WASP character is the American character. . . . It is the mold, the template, the archetype, the set of axes along which the crystal has grown. Without the WASP it would be another country altogether.”
((Coulter, Ann (2015-06-01). Adios, America: The Left's Plan to Turn Our Country into a Third World Hellhole
(Regnery Publishing))
  Now the WASP character is on Will and Grace prancing around as gay while the US Army is marching around in high heels thanks to you know who, just like Biden said. 

The End.

It's humorous that you were representing the "White supremacists" here until I started thinking, "Hey, seems like our group exists or somethin'. "

So as a representative of the "far right" beyond this softy Rick here's an interesting question about what is going on here implicitly:  Is Trump popular with the Chinese?   I don't mean the Chinese living in China.  I mean Chinese Americans and the way he's alienating them by attacking "China." Also, wouldn't they rather have a Chinese president? 

How is he doing with Arab groups?  How about Iranian Americans?  How are all the candidates doing with them as a minority group?  Do they ever have their handlers say to them,  "You better stop slobbering on Jewish oligarchs or you'll alienate the Iranian American vote.  Also, change the color of your tie... and wave your hands around like this, people like that.  Don't worry about what to say, we'll put it on the teleprompter before your next golf game and vacation." 

And so forth.  One can only imagine with these dreamers and entertainers!    Somehow it seems fitting that we have a reality show star beginning to play his implicitly White part in the Empire of Entertainment being produced in America now. 

Like the "racist" Reagan with his so-called dog whistle, Trump may even win.  I wonder who came up with that dog whistle thing.  Who thinks that White people beginning to perceive some type of a group interest in their little White/fair minds are dogs? 

It seems that anything is possible with "racism" now.  White people could be getting gunned down right in front of people* and in this anti-White Judaic culture where racism is just a code word for being anti-White:

"Well, they were just some racists."

*The latest stunt in the ethno/racial wars that have been going on around us in the "melting pot" for a while now:
Later in the manifesto, the writer quotes the Virginia Tech mass killer, Seung Hui Cho,  and calls him “his boy,” and expresses admiration for the Columbine High School killers. “Also, I was influenced by Seung–Hui Cho. [Asian, minority mentality] That’s my boy right there. He got NEARLY double the amount [of White people] that Eric Harris and Dylann Klebold [Jewish, gay minority mentality] got…just sayin’.
....
    [He talks about how he was attacked for being a gay, black man.]

“Yes, it will sound like I am angry…I am. And I have every right to be. But when I leave this Earth, the only emotion I want to feel is peace….”

“The church shooting was the tipping point…but my anger has been building steadily…I’ve been a human powder keg for a while…just waiting to go BOOM!!!!”
  This is another shooting with a theme chosen by a mental defective like Dylan Roof.   The theme doesn't really matter with some of these guys because they're probably on SSRIs.  Just consider, does going into a church and shooting old ladies really advance the cause of your group?  How?  And in this case, he apparently mentions that he's gay. 

All gays:
Facepalm.

Yeah, that really helps them out as a group.  

But I would note that the Jews (Da Joos again... yup!) of the SPLC and the ADL typically use these events to call for hate speech laws while others of the tribe call for gun control in the corporate media of America.  (Enter Feinstein, Schumer, Bloomberg, etc.)   So apparently it's time to crack down on the free speech and gun rights of African Americans and gays instead of implicitly White Constitutionalists.  Perhaps if they're found leaving an electronic footprint of incitement on Twitter or Facebook, then arrest them?  Or:  "That hurt the feelings of White people.  Now you have to have sensitivity, diversity training!  Bring in the Albino pygmies that might be gay, how do you think these whites feel about your right to free speech?  Huh, huh!!!"  It's only skin color so I figure an imaginary Albino can represent all the feels and sensitivity needed.   

Apparently, back to something closer to reality: "It doesn't matter if you hurt the feels of White people as a group.  But gays, they're a group!  So is this White guy gay, or not?  Okay, he's just White... so it doesn't matter if  you hurt his feelings with your comments.  Diversity  training, over.... where's my paycheck for this crap?"   

In all this mess, remember the key words of the establishment now: 

Multiculturalism.  "Diversity." 

Why is that valued so highly by some?  Why does anyone need more diversity, what good is it?  Like Israel Zhangwell of "melting pot" fame among some of the terminally muddle headed goyim said, more diversity usually just creates problems and violence.  

Not to mention the fact that when everyone is blended, melted and integrated  together (Hispano/African identity incoming, Mexi/Africana/Spano... I suppose.) that there is actually less real diversity then.  The Judaic/mainstream "anti-racist" supporters of fake diversity are actually taking away real biological/racial and cultural diversity because it's supposedly just "skin color."   

Saturday, August 22, 2015

Ramble 8/22

The Jewish Left (Although building their own racial/ethno state and probably about to turn a blind eye to the wars and conflicts that the Israel Lobby wants to continue to incite with Syria/Iran/Russia.) has already seen to it that White people that tend to wish to live in groups just like other groups of people will be pursued into the suburbs and targeted for diversification.

It's the Tribe. Drop the abstractions and fancy language and the fake political tribes/factions that are offered up and it comes down to the fact that the majority of Jews in the West are phobic about White people. 

The irony of their "xenophobia/nativism/phobias/racism/typical racist (!!!!)" projections is that they have phobias because Europeans supposedly turned members of their group into lamp shades and soap.

The Jewish Left isn't even really the Left as White/fair minded universalists seem to tend to understand it in America.  The Left and the Right are like the hands from which that metaphor is derived, they are merely a technique to reach out and grab power.

 So why does the Jewish Left seek to diversify everyone, no matter the carnage?  Because it's perceived to be good for their group.  Why does the Jewish Right generally keep silent about that while seeking to fight for the interests of their group based on nationalism?  Because that's what they think is good for their group.  

The heroes of White/fair minded cuckservatives were usually the same way, ethnic advocates for their own group.  Why dream of no group identities or associations existing, no matter all historical heritages that go deeper than and transcend consumerism, sex and Bratz Inc.?  Because that would be good for the group of the dreamer.  It's also  worth noting with these dreamers that they only dream of that for White people.  They still form their own groups and associations and lobbies, repeatedly, no matter their histories. 

Apparently White people liked and were drawn to a specific dreams due to their own tendencies, as a group.  But dreaming that no groups (except for small families/tribes, perhaps) existed has never been the dream of Jews, Blacks, Arabs and pretty much everyone else that's formed ethno/racial lobby groups in White countries and only White countries.  Where is a European lobby group or civil rights group in China,* representing the interests of groups of European and African Americans there? 

What was Ovadia Yosef's dream for his group?  Why do so many of these groups that market to the tendencies of European Americans (Like the Founders, against factions/tribes/gangs/groups forming to dominate others.) simultaneously form ethnic lobbies for their own groups? 

*There's all this fear mongering here about "the Chinese" this and that sometimes.  Or any other group.   Why?  All they have to do is becoming an immigrant and work as a diversity officer in the federal government, then they can attack White people with the blessing of our own anti-White system that's becoming sick to death in its will to live.  (Uh oh!)  
         
In any event, this whole global pattern created by the Jews (I thought, "Never again."  Well, stop doing what you're doing as a group.  Duh!) goes all the way down to the fact that European Americans that want to enjoy basic forms of freedom of association with their group (implicitly, in suburbs) will be targeted for diversification. 

Will be?  I should catch myself.  They already are being targeted as a group, implicitly.  I guess the people in charge of this can't just come right out and say that they're targeting a group.  Because that's a big "No, no." according to international law.   

Perhaps people call these attempts at ethnic replacement "diversity" order to avoid the implications of what should happen to leaders of psychological warfare or ethnic cleansing campaigns directed against ethnic groups and so on. 

It depends, I guess.  Why did they put a silk noose around the neck of Saddam?  Because he targeted a group of people...  but what's the ruling if a group of foreigners/traitors does that with psychological warfare instead of WMDs?  That's probably fine.

If I was a defense lawyer in these matters, as Mr. Moseley is... then I guess the best defense is: "They didn't even want to exist as a group anymore!"  Or perhaps:  "They didn't even realize that they existed as a group!"

And so forth.  Although as a defender of the natural right of European Americans to continue existing without being immivaded or diversified out of existence by the federal government, I would point out that they got Jewed over as a group.

I wonder what historians will eventually say about this, in retrospect.  Because there is a suicidal element to it now too.

  Although White people do seem to protest a lot, implicitly!  Darn near subconsciously... it's almost like they're thinking somewhere down in there:  "Racism.  Racism.  Racism!!!  But... it seems like we still exist or somethin'.  Who is my family and kin?  Do I want them to die?  Do I really want my kith and kin to be diversified out of existence?  Who am I?  Me, ma... moo???"  Etc.

They have "free speech" thanks to whatever remains of our traditions.  But they're not allowed to think about tribalism and race too much.   ;-)  Otherwise they might conclude that they exist explicitly, I'd imagine.     

Your brain recognizes a pattern or trend and then analyses the constituent components of that trend. Political Correctness, which was also invented by Noel’s ethnic group, erects an electric fence around the parts of your mind trying to point out the traits of other ethnic groups.

Noel Biderman [the CEO of Ashley Madison] is a Jew who is making millions off the misery of others, he is undermining the foundations of society, usually this is just western society but in Biderman’s case it is the whole world! But nevertheless, for this stereotype to hold true and for me to be able to correctly guess at the ethnicity of a person who is making millions off an infidelity site, Jews would already have to be deeply involved [in subversion]....  --Andrew Anglin
More young National Socialists...  who could have predicted that? 

I did. 

By the way, the Golden Dawn in Greece is becoming more influential now too.  Just wait until Glen Beck starts crying in his cheerios over that and Mr. Moseley begins attacking the Greeks again.  (Looks like they still want to exist as a group of people too, despite their own immivasion and people playing with rainbows, there to save the gay.)

What are we going to do as these patterns continue (Provided that brain dead Whites continue volunteering for the army, etc.), invade Europe or Greece for the sake of folks like Lloyd Blankfein?   ;-)

If so, then perhaps brain dead Whites will stop fighting at Christmas time again, "Why are we fighting?  Me, ma mooo?"
The Christmas truce (German: Weihnachtsfrieden; French: Trêve de Noël) was a series of widespread but unofficial ceasefires along the Western Front around Christmas 1914. In the week leading up to the holiday, German and British soldiers crossed trenches to exchange seasonal greetings and talk. In areas, men from both sides ventured into no man's land on Christmas Eve and Christmas Day to mingle and exchange food and souvenirs. There were joint burial ceremonies and prisoner swaps, while several meetings ended in carol-singing. Men played games of football with one another, giving one of the most enduring images of the truce.  --Wikipedia
But then word came from on high that the war on Christmas needed to be won.

Our generals are the same way now as they were then, too.  So they're currently concerned that Europeans will not accept more diversity and cultural enrichment.

I wonder when they'll want to start trying to sell some freedumb fries again.  It's becoming harder to sell this stuff. Whatever you do, don't volunteer to serve in an army that doesn't serve your interests.  While you're off over there, your own family may be a target for more diversity and cultural enrichment that turns into "workplace violence" or random headlines about "Man, raped and killed." over here. 

This applies mainly to people of European descent in a progressively growing anti-White culture but ultimately all groups (Perhaps with the exceptional one... and it's not the supposed gay tribe, White gays!  Lol.) will be targeted for management/diversity and "equality" by folks like Lois Lerner.

Step up Haitian immigration, say that there's an ethnic ghetto of poverty forming (rather mysteriously!) that isn't equal with suburbia and then target "racist"/White suburbia for diversification.  Etc. 

Perhaps Asian suburbanites will be less likely to put up with this than White people.  After all, they seem like they aren't so witless as to not form a lobby group like everyone but White people has here.  Why did gay lobby groups form to save the gay?  Probably because they had an identity (If a bit silly!) based on Jewish TV shows and then lobbied politicians and so on.

One can almost hear White politicians complaining implicitly about White people sometimes, "Well, if you were actually here lobbying us like these silly gay groups are then you might get your way.  But apparently you're off in your garage trying to invent something to pull your own individual bootstraps for you or something."

Actually, although politics is naturally tribal they probably couldn't even articulate the behavior of their implicit voting bloc to that degree.  Whites.  Most may not even realize they exist as a group at this point. 

But they do!  And if they expect to continue existing then they better start looking out for themselves as a group targeted for diversification, worldwide.