Monday, August 31, 2015

Ramble 8/31

The Catholic Church leaves the Jews in its dust in the Catholic Church’s eagerness to promove immigration into countries of European descent.

That's true.  Great, Mr. Moseley... you said something  fact based for once.

One problem with your observation, Catholics don't have the same influence and controlling interest in the media and American politics that Jews do.    That's why the Jews defame and degrade Catholics in Hollywood and the corporate media in America. "Madonna" made a career for herself in that culture of degradation and defamation that's little different than its explicit version in the Jewish Talmud.  Now she's planning on buying a condo in Tel Aviv and so on.  Any White goyim woman willing to sell herself like a prostitute while lecturing about "girl power" can do the same, provided she knows the right members of the tribe she may be given a "career" singing into a voice box while acting like a little goyim golem/puppet.

The corporate media in America is becoming less and less important and more fragmented, so perhaps Jewish influence is receding some.  But that's what it is for now, Jewish influence. 

If Jewish influence continues to dissipate due to the internet then perhaps we can move on to whoever else disagrees with allowing Americans of Europeans descent to continue to exist as a majority in the countries that many of their forefathers died for.  If that's Catholics, then so much the worse for them.   

Yet for now, the discourse is generally being influenced by people like Halperin and they, like you, have a cartoonish understanding of the world. So it's all, "First they came for the Mexicans.  But then I stopped them because it was just like another Holocaust.  So then my daughter was shot dead in the street, by a Mexican.  So then I decided I was transgendered.  And that was the end of my race. We're all the human race, though!"


They, like you, also seem to think that the reason that more Jews weren't saved from the Holocaust was the immigration policies of the West.  What they, like you (Given that you essentially seem to be Jewish.) forget is that your own Zionist lobbies were at work then as now.  And what did they want?  They wanted them to go to Israel based on the Transfer Agreement with the Nazis.  Many didn't even want them to come here and lobbied against it. 

But now we, and all of Europe, are supposed to be that turning away the millions (billions) of people that would like to come to the First World is just like... "another Holocaust."

And this is in the context of being expected to traipse around the world pursuing "another Hitler," when what that usually turns out to amount to us empire building or another war for Zionists.  You Zionists aren't quite getting your way on Iran, it would seem.  So I guess Jewish influence isn't all it's cracked up to be in that respect.  Although, that's mainly because they disagree with each other and Iran isn't like one of these other countries "in the region."  If more of the Tribe agreed with you and the Likud, then who knows what might happen? 

You might get the war that you've been wanting.  And then the Iranian refugees? Would they go to Israel?  No, there would be a "Little Iran" down the street.  And if they didn't assimilate, then there would probably be "little ayatollahs" later!  New rule, if you and "allies in the region" want another war then you can deal with the refugees in your own countries.  (Of course, the Swedes will probably want to swamp their country with them too!)  

Don Ayotte.. Frenchman? French man, that's probably an oxymoron.

Institutional racism is not only alive in Delaware...

It's institutionalized, where and how?  It's against the Chinese, isn't it?

This seems to be purely political for independent parties and libertarians:
Unfortunately for Paul, two assassinated NYPD officers were the predictable subsequent result of the ongoing Leftist agitation to which he was pandering. He had opened the door for his intra-party rivals to run against him on the traditional Republican issue of “law and order.”
    Yet even apart from Paul’s tactical misstep, if he had merely reviewed crime statistics issued by Eric “my people” Holder’s Justice Department—or even his father Ron Paul’s old newsletters—he would have seen that black crime is committed at a shockingly disproportionate rate, triggering a massive response from police.

Paul is too intelligent not to understand this. 
...but it has infiltrated nearly every fabric of life.

When you tell Blacks this, you incite them.  I'm against trying to thought police "hate speech"/incitement but it's ironic that you guys (The very people inciting them, usually based on lies.) try to censor based on "hate speech."

 Just think of it, we are the home of Joe Biden, the Vice President under Obama, who is considered a mixed race president.

It's not considered or made up like Rachel Dolezal.  That's who he actually is. 

You would think this state would be one of the least racist in America, but instead Delaware is one of the most racist states in America. 

ENGLISH lesson... and yes, it's English!
noun: racism
    the belief that all members of each race possess characteristics or abilities specific to that race, especially so as to distinguish it as inferior or superior to another race or races.
        prejudice, discrimination, or antagonism directed against someone of a different race based on the belief that one's own race is superior.
What is the evidence, how is Delaware "one of the most racist states" in America?

The word racism as used by peasants in America is usually just a code word for being anti-White.  This will show up as more disputes between Indians/Pakistani or perhaps Koreans shopkeepers and so on with African American criminals and heroin dealers recur.  You'll have more of a difficult time calling it all "racism."   Because no one wants their children to become heroin addicts (Do you realize what "heroin dealer" means? That's not marijuana.) or wants to have their shops burned down or looted when what is already occurring as Black mob violence directed against other groups is called another "civil rights" protest.  

Note, during the Rodney King riots the Koreans were on top of their shops with AR-15s, shot guns and so on.  I heard that they're like the "fighting" Irish of the Asians.  In other news, their shops were not looted.  There were no rapes, etc.

After his arrest was used for incitement by the media, Rodney King drowned in a swimming pool.

(Police: Rodney King's 'accidental drowning' involved drugs...

The fact that he got a beat down during his arrest while everyone else in the car that he was driving was arrested peacefully probably had to do with him being high as a kite on drugs too. 

These cases are usually similar:
Early on the morning of March 3, 1991, King, with two passengers, Bryant Allen and Freddie Helms, were driving west on the Foothill Freeway (Interstate 210) in the San Fernando Valley of Los Angeles. Prior to driving onto the Foothill Freeway, the three men had spent the night watching a basketball game and drinking at a friend's house in Los Angeles.[6] Five hours after the incident, King's blood-alcohol level was found to be slightly below the legal limit, implying his blood alcohol level may have fallen from 0.19% while he was driving, which is more than twice the legal driving limit in California.[7] At 12:30 am, Officers Tim and Melanie Singer, husband-and-wife members of the California Highway Patrol, noticed King's car speeding on the freeway. The officers pursued King, and the pursuit attained high speeds, while King refused to pull over.[8][9] King would later admit he attempted to outrun the police at dangerously high speeds because a charge of driving under the influence would violate his parole for a previous robbery conviction.[10]  --Wikipedia
If history is any measure then once implicitly White Constitutionalists and Libertarians (Ready to die over every abstraction in their fair/white little minds, etc.  I can only imagine dinner.  "Give me liberty or pass me the potatoes, now!  Point of order!  Constitutional Principles... or death!!"  Etc.) manage to save him from "police brutality" or whatever, he'll smoke his own hopium and wind up dead just like Rodney King anyway. 

And then what will this have amounted to? 

Because it looks suspiciously like another fight between people of European descent where the battle lines are drawn over meaningless nonsense.  Is he a heroin dealer?  Is he going to help your children or build up Delaware? 

Tommy Sotomayor Vs Former Klan Grand Wizard Dr David Duke

Saturday, August 29, 2015

Ramble 8/29

At any rate, it's curious that a "Hispanic" vote exists when ethnic groups supposedly don't exist at all in the first place. 

But given that many ethnic activists (anyone from Arab groups/CAIR to the Jewish Federation) are just engaged in anti-White propaganda for the sake of their own groups, all that really means is that White people don't even exist as a group. 

Little wonder that they're being ethnically replaced in their own countries all around the world.  No word yet on when China and Japan will need more diversity... due to their racism and wars in the past... or whatever.  Pretexts vary!  You know what group isn't really there agitating the Japanese or influential in more ethno/racially homogeneous countries?  There's your answer.  Duh.   Although they did arrange to have a biracial Japanese beauty queen recently. 

More entertainment.

Never mind the cost of the show... or the fact that it will ultimately turn out that it doesn't even make sense to have a "Japanese" beauty queen once their identity and heritage as "the Japanese" has been melted away.

(Biracial Beauty Queen Challenges Japan's Self-Image - The ...  NYT)


The usual.  It's like a blob heading toward you.  But if you poke at it or even joke about it, "Oy vey!  Cue the violins!! Censor, arrest them!"

But if you don't poke at it, then you may no longer have a natural right to exist as a group of people or to have freedom of association to continue existing as an ethno/racial group. 

Personally, I joke about it.  Note that the people creating this mess will try to arrest more people for "hate speech" though.  

Friday, August 28, 2015

Looks like the Jew Wolfgang von Baumgart over at Delware Politics finally couldn't keep himself in check. Just a guess. Just a stereotype!

Nobody would let the Jewish refugees from Germany in.

What an idiot.  Just, idiotic.

There was a Zionist lobby that wanted Jews to go to Israel, then as now.  So they wouldn't let them in.

THAT”s how much influence the Jews had over the Allied nations…. NONE.

Little wonder that the Jews laugh at the dumb goyim to this day.

There is no global conspiracy that's always fully articulated.  There is only the tribalism that "Zionism" is becoming a lightening rod for. 

So it's likely that even the dumbest of the freedumb fries eating goyim will know more about the Jews and what they've been doing as a group soon enough.

"We're victims, again!"

You're victims of your own tribal lobbies and your own nationalists that signed off on the Transfer Agreement with Nazis while working against letting Jewish refugees come to the West?

Well, cue the violins!

Wednesday, August 26, 2015

TV Reporter Murdered Live On Air

Meh, I have to go... ramble, 8/26

The Socialist-Democrats won’t be able to do to Hispanics what they did to blacks.

Where is there evidence of that?

Regardless of the politics, the results are usually catastrophic:  
AMERICANS SEEM TO BE UNDER THE MISIMPRESSION THEY DON’T HAVE A country at all, but rather live in something like the international waiting room at JFK Airport. America is not a “nation of immigrants,” it is not an “idea,” it was never “diverse,” and “diversity” is a catastrophe.

 If America were an “idea,” every country on earth could be America. Electricity is an idea. The airplane is an idea. Washing with soap is an idea. That’s why other countries have been able to adopt those innovations. No other country on earth has been able to approximate America— except our fellow Anglo-Saxon nations.  Why is that? We’ve been dropping enormous hints to the rest of the world for centuries. America is not a mere landmass— otherwise, the Indians would have written the Declaration of Independence and put a man on the moon. Far from discovering America, Indians didn’t even detect America. There was no America until the British and Dutch arrived. They were not “immigrants” because there was no established society for them to move to. Without the white settlers, what is known as “America” would still be an unnamed continent full of migratory tribes chasing the rear end of a buffalo every time their stomachs growled.
For one hundred years before the signing of the Declaration, and one hundred years after, America was extraordinarily un-diverse in ethnicity (British, Dutch, West African, and Germanic), in religious practice (overwhelmingly Protestant, 98 percent Christian), in language (English), and in cultural mores (no wailing at funerals or child rape). Even the few French settlers in colonial America were Protestants— they had fled France under threat of forced conversion to Catholicism. Pre-Revolutionary America allowed the naturalization of Jews— but not Catholics. 5 Curiously, in contemporary America, Hispanic Protestants are majority Republican, while Hispanic Catholics are nearly monolithically Democrat. Harvard professor Samuel Huntington asks: “Would America be the America it is today if in the 17th and 18th centuries it had been settled not by British Protestants but by French, Spanish, or Portuguese Catholics?” Clearly not: “It would not be America; it would be Quebec, Mexico, or Brazil.” 6 Author Richard Brookhiser writes: “The WASP character is the American character. . . . It is the mold, the template, the archetype, the set of axes along which the crystal has grown. Without the WASP it would be another country altogether.”
((Coulter, Ann (2015-06-01). Adios, America: The Left's Plan to Turn Our Country into a Third World Hellhole
(Regnery Publishing))
  Now the WASP character is on Will and Grace prancing around as gay while the US Army is marching around in high heels thanks to you know who, just like Biden said. 

The End.

It's humorous that you were representing the "White supremacists" here until I started thinking, "Hey, seems like our group exists or somethin'. "

So as a representative of the "far right" beyond this softy Rick here's an interesting question about what is going on here implicitly:  Is Trump popular with the Chinese?   I don't mean the Chinese living in China.  I mean Chinese Americans and the way he's alienating them by attacking "China." Also, wouldn't they rather have a Chinese president? 

How is he doing with Arab groups?  How about Iranian Americans?  How are all the candidates doing with them as a minority group?  Do they ever have their handlers say to them,  "You better stop slobbering on Jewish oligarchs or you'll alienate the Iranian American vote.  Also, change the color of your tie... and wave your hands around like this, people like that.  Don't worry about what to say, we'll put it on the teleprompter before your next golf game and vacation." 

And so forth.  One can only imagine with these dreamers and entertainers!    Somehow it seems fitting that we have a reality show star beginning to play his implicitly White part in the Empire of Entertainment being produced in America now. 

Like the "racist" Reagan with his so-called dog whistle, Trump may even win.  I wonder who came up with that dog whistle thing.  Who thinks that White people beginning to perceive some type of a group interest in their little White/fair minds are dogs? 

It seems that anything is possible with "racism" now.  White people could be getting gunned down right in front of people* and in this anti-White Judaic culture where racism is just a code word for being anti-White:

"Well, they were just some racists."

*The latest stunt in the ethno/racial wars that have been going on around us in the "melting pot" for a while now:
Later in the manifesto, the writer quotes the Virginia Tech mass killer, Seung Hui Cho,  and calls him “his boy,” and expresses admiration for the Columbine High School killers. “Also, I was influenced by Seung–Hui Cho. [Asian, minority mentality] That’s my boy right there. He got NEARLY double the amount [of White people] that Eric Harris and Dylann Klebold [Jewish, gay minority mentality] got…just sayin’.
    [He talks about how he was attacked for being a gay, black man.]

“Yes, it will sound like I am angry…I am. And I have every right to be. But when I leave this Earth, the only emotion I want to feel is peace….”

“The church shooting was the tipping point…but my anger has been building steadily…I’ve been a human powder keg for a while…just waiting to go BOOM!!!!”
  This is another shooting with a theme chosen by a mental defective like Dylan Roof.   The theme doesn't really matter with some of these guys because they're probably on SSRIs.  Just consider, does going into a church and shooting old ladies really advance the cause of your group?  How?  And in this case, he apparently mentions that he's gay. 

All gays:

Yeah, that really helps them out as a group.  

But I would note that the Jews (Da Joos again... yup!) of the SPLC and the ADL typically use these events to call for hate speech laws while others of the tribe call for gun control in the corporate media of America.  (Enter Feinstein, Schumer, Bloomberg, etc.)   So apparently it's time to crack down on the free speech and gun rights of African Americans and gays instead of implicitly White Constitutionalists.  Perhaps if they're found leaving an electronic footprint of incitement on Twitter or Facebook, then arrest them?  Or:  "That hurt the feelings of White people.  Now you have to have sensitivity, diversity training!  Bring in the Albino pygmies that might be gay, how do you think these whites feel about your right to free speech?  Huh, huh!!!"  It's only skin color so I figure an imaginary Albino can represent all the feels and sensitivity needed.   

Apparently, back to something closer to reality: "It doesn't matter if you hurt the feels of White people as a group.  But gays, they're a group!  So is this White guy gay, or not?  Okay, he's just White... so it doesn't matter if  you hurt his feelings with your comments.  Diversity  training, over.... where's my paycheck for this crap?"   

In all this mess, remember the key words of the establishment now: 

Multiculturalism.  "Diversity." 

Why is that valued so highly by some?  Why does anyone need more diversity, what good is it?  Like Israel Zhangwell of "melting pot" fame among some of the terminally muddle headed goyim said, more diversity usually just creates problems and violence.  

Not to mention the fact that when everyone is blended, melted and integrated  together (Hispano/African identity incoming, Mexi/Africana/Spano... I suppose.) that there is actually less real diversity then.  The Judaic/mainstream "anti-racist" supporters of fake diversity are actually taking away real biological/racial and cultural diversity because it's supposedly just "skin color."   

Saturday, August 22, 2015

Ramble 8/22

The Jewish Left (Although building their own racial/ethno state and probably about to turn a blind eye to the wars and conflicts that the Israel Lobby wants to continue to incite with Syria/Iran/Russia.) has already seen to it that White people that tend to wish to live in groups just like other groups of people will be pursued into the suburbs and targeted for diversification.

It's the Tribe. Drop the abstractions and fancy language and the fake political tribes/factions that are offered up and it comes down to the fact that the majority of Jews in the West are phobic about White people. 

The irony of their "xenophobia/nativism/phobias/racism/typical racist (!!!!)" projections is that they have phobias because Europeans supposedly turned members of their group into lamp shades and soap.

The Jewish Left isn't even really the Left as White/fair minded universalists seem to tend to understand it in America.  The Left and the Right are like the hands from which that metaphor is derived, they are merely a technique to reach out and grab power.

 So why does the Jewish Left seek to diversify everyone, no matter the carnage?  Because it's perceived to be good for their group.  Why does the Jewish Right generally keep silent about that while seeking to fight for the interests of their group based on nationalism?  Because that's what they think is good for their group.  

The heroes of White/fair minded cuckservatives were usually the same way, ethnic advocates for their own group.  Why dream of no group identities or associations existing, no matter all historical heritages that go deeper than and transcend consumerism, sex and Bratz Inc.?  Because that would be good for the group of the dreamer.  It's also  worth noting with these dreamers that they only dream of that for White people.  They still form their own groups and associations and lobbies, repeatedly, no matter their histories. 

Apparently White people liked and were drawn to a specific dreams due to their own tendencies, as a group.  But dreaming that no groups (except for small families/tribes, perhaps) existed has never been the dream of Jews, Blacks, Arabs and pretty much everyone else that's formed ethno/racial lobby groups in White countries and only White countries.  Where is a European lobby group or civil rights group in China,* representing the interests of groups of European and African Americans there? 

What was Ovadia Yosef's dream for his group?  Why do so many of these groups that market to the tendencies of European Americans (Like the Founders, against factions/tribes/gangs/groups forming to dominate others.) simultaneously form ethnic lobbies for their own groups? 

*There's all this fear mongering here about "the Chinese" this and that sometimes.  Or any other group.   Why?  All they have to do is becoming an immigrant and work as a diversity officer in the federal government, then they can attack White people with the blessing of our own anti-White system that's becoming sick to death in its will to live.  (Uh oh!)  
In any event, this whole global pattern created by the Jews (I thought, "Never again."  Well, stop doing what you're doing as a group.  Duh!) goes all the way down to the fact that European Americans that want to enjoy basic forms of freedom of association with their group (implicitly, in suburbs) will be targeted for diversification. 

Will be?  I should catch myself.  They already are being targeted as a group, implicitly.  I guess the people in charge of this can't just come right out and say that they're targeting a group.  Because that's a big "No, no." according to international law.   

Perhaps people call these attempts at ethnic replacement "diversity" order to avoid the implications of what should happen to leaders of psychological warfare or ethnic cleansing campaigns directed against ethnic groups and so on. 

It depends, I guess.  Why did they put a silk noose around the neck of Saddam?  Because he targeted a group of people...  but what's the ruling if a group of foreigners/traitors does that with psychological warfare instead of WMDs?  That's probably fine.

If I was a defense lawyer in these matters, as Mr. Moseley is... then I guess the best defense is: "They didn't even want to exist as a group anymore!"  Or perhaps:  "They didn't even realize that they existed as a group!"

And so forth.  Although as a defender of the natural right of European Americans to continue existing without being immivaded or diversified out of existence by the federal government, I would point out that they got Jewed over as a group.

I wonder what historians will eventually say about this, in retrospect.  Because there is a suicidal element to it now too.

  Although White people do seem to protest a lot, implicitly!  Darn near subconsciously... it's almost like they're thinking somewhere down in there:  "Racism.  Racism.  Racism!!!  But... it seems like we still exist or somethin'.  Who is my family and kin?  Do I want them to die?  Do I really want my kith and kin to be diversified out of existence?  Who am I?  Me, ma... moo???"  Etc.

They have "free speech" thanks to whatever remains of our traditions.  But they're not allowed to think about tribalism and race too much.   ;-)  Otherwise they might conclude that they exist explicitly, I'd imagine.     

Your brain recognizes a pattern or trend and then analyses the constituent components of that trend. Political Correctness, which was also invented by Noel’s ethnic group, erects an electric fence around the parts of your mind trying to point out the traits of other ethnic groups.

Noel Biderman [the CEO of Ashley Madison] is a Jew who is making millions off the misery of others, he is undermining the foundations of society, usually this is just western society but in Biderman’s case it is the whole world! But nevertheless, for this stereotype to hold true and for me to be able to correctly guess at the ethnicity of a person who is making millions off an infidelity site, Jews would already have to be deeply involved [in subversion]....  --Andrew Anglin
More young National Socialists...  who could have predicted that? 

I did. 

By the way, the Golden Dawn in Greece is becoming more influential now too.  Just wait until Glen Beck starts crying in his cheerios over that and Mr. Moseley begins attacking the Greeks again.  (Looks like they still want to exist as a group of people too, despite their own immivasion and people playing with rainbows, there to save the gay.)

What are we going to do as these patterns continue (Provided that brain dead Whites continue volunteering for the army, etc.), invade Europe or Greece for the sake of folks like Lloyd Blankfein?   ;-)

If so, then perhaps brain dead Whites will stop fighting at Christmas time again, "Why are we fighting?  Me, ma mooo?"
The Christmas truce (German: Weihnachtsfrieden; French: Trêve de Noël) was a series of widespread but unofficial ceasefires along the Western Front around Christmas 1914. In the week leading up to the holiday, German and British soldiers crossed trenches to exchange seasonal greetings and talk. In areas, men from both sides ventured into no man's land on Christmas Eve and Christmas Day to mingle and exchange food and souvenirs. There were joint burial ceremonies and prisoner swaps, while several meetings ended in carol-singing. Men played games of football with one another, giving one of the most enduring images of the truce.  --Wikipedia
But then word came from on high that the war on Christmas needed to be won.

Our generals are the same way now as they were then, too.  So they're currently concerned that Europeans will not accept more diversity and cultural enrichment.

I wonder when they'll want to start trying to sell some freedumb fries again.  It's becoming harder to sell this stuff. Whatever you do, don't volunteer to serve in an army that doesn't serve your interests.  While you're off over there, your own family may be a target for more diversity and cultural enrichment that turns into "workplace violence" or random headlines about "Man, raped and killed." over here. 

This applies mainly to people of European descent in a progressively growing anti-White culture but ultimately all groups (Perhaps with the exceptional one... and it's not the supposed gay tribe, White gays!  Lol.) will be targeted for management/diversity and "equality" by folks like Lois Lerner.

Step up Haitian immigration, say that there's an ethnic ghetto of poverty forming (rather mysteriously!) that isn't equal with suburbia and then target "racist"/White suburbia for diversification.  Etc. 

Perhaps Asian suburbanites will be less likely to put up with this than White people.  After all, they seem like they aren't so witless as to not form a lobby group like everyone but White people has here.  Why did gay lobby groups form to save the gay?  Probably because they had an identity (If a bit silly!) based on Jewish TV shows and then lobbied politicians and so on.

One can almost hear White politicians complaining implicitly about White people sometimes, "Well, if you were actually here lobbying us like these silly gay groups are then you might get your way.  But apparently you're off in your garage trying to invent something to pull your own individual bootstraps for you or something."

Actually, although politics is naturally tribal they probably couldn't even articulate the behavior of their implicit voting bloc to that degree.  Whites.  Most may not even realize they exist as a group at this point. 

But they do!  And if they expect to continue existing then they better start looking out for themselves as a group targeted for diversification, worldwide.   

Monday, August 17, 2015

The usual?

Perhaps the usual applied then as now, abject hypocrisy running the gamut from servile and corrupt "progressives"  like Nitpicker to fundamentalist Judaizers like Mr. Moseley. 

Using what happened here as a model for bringing about the decline of "the Russians" as a group by inciting minorities and so on, why not begin lobby and front groups that open up immigration to turn "the Russians" into a minority in their own country and then give all the "minority immigrants" voting rights there?  Then there would be no more "Russia" for the Jews to be trying to incite White Americans against within a few generations.  Specific Jewish individuals have left an electronic footprint of how they work together as a tribal/oligarchic group again so don't bother trying to deny their attempts to incite conflict with Russia. 

If what was done to Americans after WWII could be done to the Russians as an ethnic group then they'd probably be busy debating bathrooms while every other space shuttle or missile crashed in the background.

White Americans still have some fuel in or tank and some momentum in our "multicultural" trajectory.... but White man lands a probe on a comet 310 million miles from Earth, cries about the cartoons on his shirt. (Talk about the zenith and nadir of a civilization!)

You think I'm joking?  

(Video: Rosetta mission scientist Dr Matt Taylor cries during ...
The Daily Telegraph
Nov 14, 2014 - He helped mankind land on a comet, but Dr Matt Taylor may end up being remembered...)
('Feminist bullies' just made a comet scientist cry ... - Twitchy
Nov 14, 2014 - When the European Space Agency landed on Comet 67P on ... guy who landed a spacecraft on comet cry and apologise for a harmless shirt.)
(....1 small shirt for a man, 1 giant leap backward for women ...)

Meanwhile, Hispanics are doing what they do as a group when it comes to so-called "women's rights," Black rappers continue to produce what they produce... and many groups of Brown Arabs continue to do what they do as groups.

No word yet on when any members of those groups will start crying about cartoons like a White (Pretty much a Nazi, according to many Jews!) scientist did.  If all White men are naturally sexist/supremacists/racists then why did Matt Taylor cry and why are so many White men subject to sniveling, minority Jewish influence to this degree?

I don't see Arab or Mexican men doing this:  "Oh my goodness, my cartoon shirt offended some woman...  me cry now!"  

I could be wrong.  Just saying. 

It seems like the main reason that the Empire of Entertainment and Game of Victims could be built on the backs of White men is that they're the group of people that tend to put up with it. 

I mean, what if we tried to support a Voting Rights Act and an Immigration Act in Israel or China?  Would these other groups put up with that or would they begin to explicitly delineate their own ethnic identity?  (Aka, xenophobia, phobias in general, intolerance and hate... according to... Jews!) 

How about more Africans vote in China, as "the Chinese" once they've emigrated?  Leading you supposed national security buffs to: "The Chinese are a threat to us!  Wait, they look like African Manchurian candidates...  but..  they're the Chinese!!!"  Etc.   

Why not?   

 ...are the primary reason why the 1965 Voting Rights Act was enacted in the first place.

But seriously, what was the real reason? 

Apparently it mysteriously seems to align with the 1965 immigration bill by which the ethnic displacement of Whites (and also Blacks) has already taken place. 

You can't bring in people at the rate of replacing states in the union and expect it not to have an affect on the groups already here.

The 60s, subject to Jewish influence and subversion as a thanks for WWII resulted in:

(Voting Rights Act of 1965)
(Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965)

What did people think the results of "winning" WWII and then passing legislation of that sort were going to be?  Now it's being combined with multiculturalism while the federal government begins chasing White people around the country in order to diversify them out of existence and integrate them with other groups.  They have already established and incentivized an anti-White system here.  "Institutionalized."  

Apparently you guys support this while talking about "archetypal bigotry" based on characters like Archie Bunker on Jewish TV shows.  That as a TV show.  That's Hollywood. That's "the media."  You do understand the difference between TV shows created by Jews based on their usual incitement and creation of minorities/tools based on "Is it good for the Jews." ...   and reality, right?

IT IS A GRIM AND TERRIBLE FACT that most of the members of our own race have had their minds so deformed.... that they have been conditioned, as effectively as well-trained dogs, to snarl and bite when their Jewish masters utter certain key-words, such as "fascist," "racist," and the like, which take the place of the "sic 'em" to which dogs respond.

They are, furthermore, so emotionally addicted to narcotic fantasies that many of them are both unwilling and unable to endure the distress of looking at the real world about them and thinking rationally about it. They understandably prefer to close tightly the eyes of their minds and live in the  dream-world of pleasurable fairy tales, such as they heard in the childhood to which they subconsciously long to regress. As Kipling neatly characterized them, "If they desire a thing, they declare it is true. If they desire it not, though that were death itself, they cry aloud, 'It has never been!'"

It is a tragic and potentially disastrous fact that any candid and reasonably comprehensive analysis of our present plight not only exposes its author to surreptitious or open reprisals, but also alienates many members of our befuddled and perhaps doomed race, making them snarl and want to bite the man who would make them face an unpleasant reality. Many more are so timorous that even a hint of disrespect for Jews sends them running for cover, like frightened cats, lest the Jews punish them for having listened to impious words.  --A Jewish Strategy, REVILO P. OLIVER

Perhaps in reality, it's "bigoted" and "racist" to try to ethnically replace a group of people or diversify them out of existence due to perceiving them as a threat to your own group. 

Every single group of people in the world has a history that could be subject to the withering culture of critique created by Jews for other people, to the point that the more muddle headed would start playing pretend about being from a different group.  What is currently being done by the Jews to White people could be done to any group.  Although one might argue that the Chinese and other groups would be less likely to be put up with being Jewed over.  Indeed, this can be observed. 

If you're interested in "national security" then why not propose the ethnic replacement of "the Russians" based on these techniques of "combating racism," "xenophobia" and "homophobia" too.  Just like 1965 (apparently), this would be important:

1.  Bring in more foreigners.
2.  Give them voting rights.
3.  Establish explicit cultural celebrations for every single group but Russians themselves, the implicit majority subject to explicit attacks.

 Imagine the multicultural possibilities of making diversity their weakness while stepping up immigration and inciting whatever other minorities could be found or created to use against "the Russian" majority. 

Perhaps the new focus for the Russians, what Christians will be forced to write gay on some ethnic food for the "gay minority" and what bathrooms will they use later?   You'd probably need a few "...archetypal racially and ethnicly bigoted guys..." like Archie Bunker represented on Russian TV shows in order to make Russian men look like archetypical racist buffoons and so on. 

But I think history indicates that empires built up by people of European descent can rather easily begin to decline based on parasitism if subject to a (supposedly) very mysterious cultural "influence."

Friday, August 07, 2015

Olga Kuzkova Stripped Of Beauty Title for Beliefs

Democracy, ramble...

Voting is the embodiment of universal suffrage.

Perhaps people could just have the whole world/universe vote in American elections in order to avoid "nativism," "birtherism," "intolerance," "racism" and "xenophobia."

I wonder if theforeign and alien (Wut?) intelligence services of other nations ever have a creative thinking meeting and go, "Well, we could just groom a bunch of our Chinese students over there and have them vote in their elections for our own Manchurian candidate.  He could be the first Chinese president.  And that would really be diversity for them." 

Probably not.

Although, if I was working for intelligence agencies long term I would argue this:  "Just work to get more Jewish immigrants into their country, then come back a generation or two later and the original nation won't even know who they are as a group of people anymore.  Then our own group can take them over while they're fighting about a transgender minority being like a Bathroom Tribe about to be gassed in the gas chambers."  

Simple.  Long term.

It would take a while for Jews to convince the Chinese that they were "Chinese supremacists" for wanting to live in China as "the Chinese" like they have been for thousands of years.  And they'd have a hard time blending in, so the subversive Tribe would probably need some extra time.  They'd probably have to focus on minoritizing the women and creating minorities there first, whatever they could find to begin to break the Chinese as a group of people apart while "the Jews" there rather mysteriously arose as an oligarchical, ethnically homogenous class above the Chinese. 

The usual, which seems to have a certain life span: 
The Jewish technique, as was too candidly explained by the notorious agitator, Herbert Aptheker, consists in finding large groups of goyim who can be isolated from the rest of the society on the basis of some economic, occupational, regional, cultural, sexual, or racial interest they have in common, persuading them that they are “oppressed” by the wicked society, inciting them to hatred of their “oppressors” and making them greedy for the profits they think they can gain by “demanding their rights,” and thus setting each group against all others until the nation is paralysed by pseudo-legal contention that may hopefully be expected to eventuate in civil wars, massive massacres, and a reversion to total barbarism. The Jews, who are always careful to wail that they are a “persecuted minority” with a passion for godly “justice,” are thus ideally prepared to incite the “underprivileged” to outbreaks for “social justice,” and it is, of course, well known that all of the multiple forms of subversion are directed by Jews, often quite openly, although they usually try to associate with them some hired or light-headed members of each group they are inciting to what will be, in the end, self-destruction. 
A Jewish Strategy

The Debates, More Entertainment

My wife,  "Oh, Chris Christie is running?"  (Note what that indicates among low information voters.)

Me, "Yeah, there are a lot of candidates. They need to thin the herd soon....  especially in his case." 

Her, "Lovies!!!"