Tuesday, December 18, 2012

Comment rescue....

““A militia, when properly formed, are in fact the people themselves…and include all men capable of bearing arms.”
I’d imagine that secretly, deep in their little lemmings hearts many really do want to govern themselves and not leave their government to Bloomberg’s banksters or the elite special forces of the central “gun culture”… just like the Founder’s said.
My only point about it would be this, you don’t really need a gun as long as the media stays decentralized and no one pulls the plug on it in case of national emergency, etc. And it’s unlikely that any central power can do that because the trend of lemmings: “Wait, I can’t watch my Justin Bieber videos on my iPhone? Why not… wait, what’s going on in reality!! I may want to try to govern myself now.  So what's going on outside of the iworld if me, myself and I, again?” Etc. (From the perspective of the banksters and symbolic birds of prey, it’s probably important to keep what amount to lemmings and debt slaves entertained so that their wealth can be extracted or so that they can be used as collateral for even bigger “too big to fail” bets.)
The emergent central powers of “too big to fail” finance may be able to do away with decentralized weaponry and centralize arms to protect themselves (even that is unlikely) but it’s even more unlikely that a corrupt degenerate like Bloomberg can do away with the decentralized media before the collapse. So he’s probably done or he’ll have to get ahead of the curve eventually and play pretend about being a reformer.
But enjoy their theatrics about guns in the meantime…
Still waiting on them to dismantle their SUV convoys, send their mercenaries home and so on. Or do they deserve better security than the least of these? Of course, it would be quite dangerous to send their own super expert security teams to the schools? (If they’re not too busy with Colombian hookers, etc.  The decline of civilization hits the Praetorian Guard, too..)

What was the point of all the centralized “gun culture” theatrics surrounding the President and wealthy politicians… protecting and serving or providing for the common defense, again?

No comments: