Metabunk 6/24

If the terrorism that the generals of 911 can't seem to stop no matter how many dots they're given to connect (like "conspiracy theorists" usually can and Metabunk usually can't) is caused by the intelligence services of the oligarchs then it's not going to matter how many dots or how much data they're given and so forth. They still wouldn't stop terrorism, although they might have more data for insider trading and so forth. Because they would be the traitors either letting terrorism happen or making it happen. Not that they would see it that way. The logic I've seen coming out of many incorporated into the military industrial complex goes something like this: "We're going to need another 911 in order to protect people. Honey Boo Boo America just doesn't get it and the danger we're protecting them from. Another 911... $afety first!" And that would only be traitorous from the perspective of Honey Boo Boo America, at least among those that die in the attack that's either allowed to happen or made to happen. At this point, others might say: "Yes. Kill some other people or let them die and be terrorized... to keep on keeping me safe! Yay for my safety!"

It isn't "traitorous" in the minds of those incorporated in the military industrial complex to fantasize about all they could do geopolitically or even culturally with another false flag attack. An event that would happen to legitimize their occupations* and probably wind up incorporating many into all the profits made by defense contractors while raising the profiles of generals and so forth. Apparently it's only "traitorous" when someone seeking to uphold the Constitution undermines the business of those incorporated into the 911 business model or their legitimacy and occupation as officials and generals and so forth.

*As opposed to what should actually happen if they're failures:

The principle of ministerial responsibility provides the most rudimentary and the most essential reality principle** for government officials: the sure knowledge that if catastrophes take place on their watch, they will be sacked. In an oligarchical system like ours, this is absolutely necessary to create a minimum common interest between security officials and the citizens. The alien neocon notion of martial law abolishes this reality principle by threatening to freeze the failed officials in power as a reward for their own bungling incompetence–or for their treasonous complicity. (9/11 Synthetic Terror: Made in USA Tarpley, Webster Griffin (2012-04-12))

**Contrast trying to focus on reality with:

The aide said that guys like me were "in what we call the reality-based community," which he defined as people who "believe that solutions emerge from your judicious study of discernible reality." I nodded and murmured something about enlightenment principles and empiricism. He cut me off. "That's not the way the world really works anymore." He continued "We're an empire now, and when we act, we create our own reality. And while you're studying that reality—judiciously, as you will—we'll act again, creating other new realities, which you can study too, and that's how things will sort out. We're history's actors ... and you, all of you, will be left to just study what we do."

So in the next episode of the theatrical production of war... can we have Dancing in the Mid East, as Stars Earn Stripes? Here we are now, entertain us. If only no one had to pay for creating the show for Team America, World Police in reality, huh?

Metabunk