Ramble 1/9... not sure about this one. Whatever.

  Anthropologists seem to say that mentioning "culture" justifies a generalization about groups of people, magic word noted.  Not that I won't use that word too.  Occultists have a concept they call the egregore or group mind.  Too esoteric, if perhaps real enough given the way that cultures seem to be cultivated based on symbolism.  Guess I'm stuck with "culture." 


Not to generalize.. because this is one crazy looney tune Jew as an individual that's apparently from the crazy guy with a beard section (in general, sort of like other religious fanatics with beards).... but an Israeli youth leader recently said that the IDF should go and collect a few hundred Palestinian foreskins.  So apparently if they ever herd the Palestinians off onto reservations somewhere and shift over to using tribalism for entertainment then they could name their fake tribes the Foreskins.  

Perhaps the cultural discourse of the future in America as well:  "I'm a fan of the Redskins." 

"You just generalized!" 

"Well I'm not a fan of the whole team... just all the individuals on the team, see? 

"Now you're just generalizing...  individual by individual!"

Etc.

It's like a game that is being played, except that when we shift back over from entertainment to reality...  people wind up dead from it.  There have even been fans killed over the fake tribalism of sports teams too.  A miniscule among compared to the real tribalism of real wars, I suppose.. I wonder if the F35 will ever fly over the bread and circuses stadiums in America?  Or if America can even still make a plane that flies well?    

In any case... observable reality and less entertainment, that's what interests me right here and now. If some crazy guys with beards (Not all of them, just most of them!) want to go off and believe that Europeans and Arabs are goyim/cattle* and they're the chosen master race awaiting a King of the Jews, fine.  But if they want to start saying that slaughtering Palestinian children is kosher while talking about beginning a foreskin collection, then that's not fine.  It would seem that I have my own view of what is kosher and what is not.

Because being against foreskin collections and the killing of children does not seem antisemitic or that outrageous to me.  But if being against collecting foreskins (among other things) is antisemitic, then I am antisemitic.  Whatever the case may be, you probably should not generalize about all antisemitism based on the actions of a few individual leaders in the past. 

Etc. 

*There can be a shift in meaning in the word goyim, depending on who you're talking too.  Some of them are dividing themselves from the entire world as a tribe by defining goy while some... a few, as individuals... are calling everyone else cattle.  Same thing with the Kuffar/Dhimmi concept in Islam, although interpretations and perspectives tend to vary...    is there a cattle concept like that in Christianity?  Saved and unsaved or sheep and goats, I guess.... but that usually has nothing to do with political power.  (As looney tunes as people are when it comes to religion, I could be wrong.  There's probably some group that has figured out a way to violate everything.)  At least it's clear that everyone is like a herd of cattle in Christian symbolism.  (Even if we are all like cattle, imagine an angelic PETA group that wants to save us from slaughter.... and there you go, goyim/kuffar/sheep/cattle status doesn't matter.  That's probably what we need to do in this dimension too.  Send PETA on over to the jihadis calling people kuffar to tell them that cattle have rights too!)