Wednesday, January 14, 2015

I stopped this mid ramble because I have to go. Sorry about the mess here... turned into a dumping ground.

Apparently, Frank says:
Well the TEA  12ers won elections tonight, but the only thing they get to govern is an irrelevant committee.
   The Sussex GOP Committee has now completely been taken over by what amounts to the Sussex Taliban. They will continue to seek pietism  in their politics, they will continue to exclude more and more people, until there is nothing left that can be called a party.  Link
What is pietism in their politic?  And if everyone is excluded from a tribe or a party, then would they get back to being individuals?

In any case, I was wondering recently why working class white people cannot form a party to advance their interests directly like Jews and African Americans and even a few other tribes do.  I was thinking that it's because they've been indoctrinated not to do that, lest the people that won WWII be "Nazis" according to the kosher media.  Yeah, that's the thanks you get.   But when one observes white behavior, it seems more likely that wandering around alone without help from the tribe* comes naturally to the descendents of the white people of the North.  Preppers.  Duck Dynasty.  Bitter clingers?  They're rugged individualists, while their left wing is full of pathological altruists.  Little wonder that all their demographic trends are down.  But once they're the minority, as they already are in some regions... who will lobby for them or represent them as I have here?  Who will be altruistic for them?  One might ask, why bother?  After all, their pathological altruists and ethnic masochists will tell you that you're a racial supremacist for so much as pointing out that they should have a lobby group too... while their rugged individualist "right wing" does not need a group at all.  (The only thing they can be counted on to do, is atomize... it would seem.  They care about the establishment of religion and the imposition of religious beliefs on tribes and groups?  Uh huh.  I hadn't noticed that.  But what)     

*Or help from a political party, if you're into framing tribalism as a form of entertainment.  If you cannot get it together and form a tribe then you will not be able to have a party.  Just saying.  But perhaps what Frank is saying is that people are having a party and he has been left out.  And that's all it amounts to.  Because from a gay sex in the city perspective he is "like" the Taliban, beard and all.  Metaphors like that get a bit hazy for peasants ruled by an oligarchic National Security State Inc. trying to call each other terrorists, it would seem?  Does he know much about the Taliban?  Oh well, never mind...

How about another metaphor, are you squabbling hobbits sure that this has something to do with getting roads built in the shire?

No comments: