Challenge Zionism and see what happens to the wedge or "culture war" type issues like abortion and gay rights being marketed to values voters while War Inc. churns on in the background.
What really comes first, the wedge issues used by Rove or the oligarchic power structures that have grown up around Zionism? Would Joel Rosenberg give up on the religious tribalism and forms of racial supremacy used to justify Zionism in order to support the "culture war" of conservative Christians if he had to choose between actually winning it while doing away with Christian Zionism? I doubt it.
Not that Christians are making him choose between "standing with" them and their family values. They're expected to "stand with Israel" (no matter what), it's never the other way around. Ironically, many Christians seem fine with being expected to stand with Israel and basically sacrifice their national credit/credibility for the sake of Zionism. Shrug.
I'm just saying, in theory if Fay and Rosenberg could be "wedged" apart to the same extent that Americans have been in general (calling each other terrists, etc.)... then which side would Rosenberg choose? Or if Fay had to give up on her stance on abortion, given that it's being provided for free in Israel* and so on (as seems to be consistent with rabbinic teachings)... then would she and Wade still "stand with Israel" despite their values?
It seems like they would all give up their supposedly cherished values in order to "stand with Israel" above all. So what is all this talk about "values voters" and what they can supposedly be expected to support and vote for, really? What all sides really seem to "value" is winning elections that are pretty much transparently useless at this point, thanks partly to the most transparent administration ever.
Tuesday, September 30, 2014
Joel Rosenberg?
Pretty sure this is the same guy that wrote this article:
Not that the Democrats are any better. In fact, they're arguably worse because their brand of Zionist usually runs in the name of peace, humanism, equality, anti-racism and being "antiwar." Seriously. They're anti-racists and anti-war? Chuck "strangle the Palestinians" Schumer or who?
Pathetic. Still waiting on people getting tired of voting for the current collection of hypocrites and criminals, etc. Perhaps it's best that many Republicans are merely patriotically courageously clueless, sort of like Rosenberg and Wade. But what's the excuse for Democrats that run on being anti-nationalist (while supporting the establishment of a racist state), anti-war (while voting for War Inc.) and farting rainbows (gay marriage and abortion, as bankers loot the value out of anything they trickle down on their lemmings anyway)?
SSM is marketed to Democrats and the clueless single woman vote. But then it turns out that you don't have a job and your savings have been looted. Duh.
War Inc. and the big businesses of Zion are marketed to "values voters," yet then it turns out that your veterans are killing themselves after coming home to closed open air war memorials and they've been sacrificed for foreign interests. Again, duh.
But it would seem that this is the way that people want things. The idea that someone is getting a free rainbow is more important than the fact that they are not. The idea of heroism and courage and a "band of brothers" is more important than the fact that patriotic nationalists are coming home to become homeless and killing themselves while international bankers are bailed out. Why is this the way that things are? Apparently this is the way that people want them to be, as they value the theatrical production of a show (the media, politicians) more than reality (money and power, etc.).
More entertainment.
Joel C. Rosenberg, has a rather nuanced view of the peace process. Rosenberg, the founder of The Joshua Fund — whose operating motto is “Pray for peace, but prepare for war” — maintained on his blog that despite the previous failures at reaching an accord, “we should not write off this possibility [of peace] too quickly.”What's the point of him working to inspire "values voters"? It would seem that an aspect of it is to get Team America to go to war for Israel again. And that means more veterans coming home and killing themselves and so on. When is Israel going to bomb ISIS, again? When will they "stand with America"?
Rosenberg, a Jew who converted to Christianity more than 30 years ago, was a mostly behind-the-scenes figure in the conservative movement until his first novel, The Last Jihad, became a New York Times bestseller. Over the years, he has worked for former Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Israeli politician Natan Sharansky, US business magazine magnate Steve Forbes, and right-wing radio talk show host Rush Limbaugh. He is also a former Heritage Foundation staffer.
Rosenberg appears to believe that if peace deal is concluded, it will not contradict Biblical...
“Meanwhile,” writes Rosenberg, the Likud Party’s Benjamin Netanyahu, a close ally/friend of U.S. Christian Zionists, “is waiting in the wings, talking tough on Gaza and Iran, saying Olmert should strike hard and fast with ‘disproportionate force’ against Palestinian terrorists.” Netanyahu said that “In a war of attrition the enemy strikes and you react, the enemy strikes harder and you retaliate harder. This gradual increase in violence is the antithesis of deterrence….Deterrence always means using disproportionate force. We need to move from a concept of attrition to one of tough deterrence that will eventually lead to the removal of the Hamas regime, because as long as it exists it will continue arming itself and continue its attacks.” ....
Rosenberg’s Joshua Fund is organizing a conference slated for April 10 in Jerusalem to celebrate Israel’s 60th anniversary. According to Rosenberg, the purpose of the conference is “to educate people as to the serious threats facing the Jewish State and their neighbors, mobilize Christians around the world to pray for the peace of Jerusalem, and provide
humanitarian relief to the poor and needy and those suffering from war and terrorism.” Link
Not that the Democrats are any better. In fact, they're arguably worse because their brand of Zionist usually runs in the name of peace, humanism, equality, anti-racism and being "antiwar." Seriously. They're anti-racists and anti-war? Chuck "strangle the Palestinians" Schumer or who?
Pathetic. Still waiting on people getting tired of voting for the current collection of hypocrites and criminals, etc. Perhaps it's best that many Republicans are merely patriotically courageously clueless, sort of like Rosenberg and Wade. But what's the excuse for Democrats that run on being anti-nationalist (while supporting the establishment of a racist state), anti-war (while voting for War Inc.) and farting rainbows (gay marriage and abortion, as bankers loot the value out of anything they trickle down on their lemmings anyway)?
SSM is marketed to Democrats and the clueless single woman vote. But then it turns out that you don't have a job and your savings have been looted. Duh.
War Inc. and the big businesses of Zion are marketed to "values voters," yet then it turns out that your veterans are killing themselves after coming home to closed open air war memorials and they've been sacrificed for foreign interests. Again, duh.
But it would seem that this is the way that people want things. The idea that someone is getting a free rainbow is more important than the fact that they are not. The idea of heroism and courage and a "band of brothers" is more important than the fact that patriotic nationalists are coming home to become homeless and killing themselves while international bankers are bailed out. Why is this the way that things are? Apparently this is the way that people want them to be, as they value the theatrical production of a show (the media, politicians) more than reality (money and power, etc.).
More entertainment.
Wednesday, September 24, 2014
How cynical!
new nope-1004
No, not obvious. The most advanced military in the world ALWAYS has equipment stolen from them right under their noses.Gotta have a boogeyman to keep the sheeple scared enough to fall incline,milks good, docile sheeple, as they're stripped of their economic, constitutional, & personal rights & dignities (and stripped literally, in many cases).
There are no coincidences. As I stated the other day, Bring on Hil-Dog '16!
4 (or 8) more PNAC* Wars!
*Starting with the 9/11 attacks, PNAC got what it wanted: A large portion of the world in turmoil (Arab Spring, Ukraine-Russia Crisis, A Complete Surveillance State Apparatus ala imbedded technology & discarded Constitution, and a huge build up in the MIC and FBT (Financial, Banking & Technology Complex).
Dual-Citizens Unite!
Shabbos Goyim bow down!
You know the fat is in the fire when the NYTs breaks a story like this... Doesn't look good for the coalition, now does it... All this ISIS subterfuge is merely an excuse for the US to bomb the crap out of Syria... No more, no less...
Actually there is a little more to it...
Get the troops on the ground to control the region and protect the oil, break the country up into managable bite-sized chunks and transfer the oil to our multinationals ...
http://www.newyorker.com/news/daily-comment/breaking-maliki-biden
For better or worse, Iraq has been Biden’s bag ever since a national-security meeting, in the summer of 2009, when Obama turned to him and said, “Joe, you do Iraq”
Biden said, according to the account. “I’ll bet you my vice presidency Maliki will extend the SOFA.”
And this is where the problems started...
Jewish Supremacy
Jewish supremacism is the belief, and promotion of the belief, that the Jews are superior to all others and should rightfully have control over non-Jews in all matters. The religion of Talmudic Judaism itself claims that the Jews are a race "chosen" by God ahead of the rest of humanity. Jewish supremacists believe that they are morally, intellectually, religuously and genetically superior. The purpose of this belief is to have an excuse to commit crimes such as the black slave trade, the Red Holocaust and Zionism. These crimes are used to establish social, political, historical and/or industrial dominance by Jews. The supremacist views are often "supported" by fallacious scientific research of which the outcome is predetermined so that the supremacist views are "confirmed".
Jewish supremacism is rooted in ethnocentrism and a desire for hegemony and power, and has frequently resulted in violence against non-Jews. Different forms of Jewish supremacism have different conceptions of who is considered Jew, and not all Jewish supremacist organizations agree on who is their greatest enemy. Jewish supremacism distinguishes itself from other forms of supremacism, as Jewish supremacist groups can be found in all countries with a Jewish minority or majority population, whereas this cannot be said of other forms of supremacism: for example not all, countries with a black minority also have black supremacist groups. Unfortunately, in most countries even militant Jewish supremacist organizations are not watched closely by law enforcement officials, but instead often subsidized by the governments under influence of the Zionist lobby. Metapedia
That's about the size of it.
Friday, September 19, 2014
Ramble on climate change.. 9/19
Fortunately in reality, the planet and the Earth/Moon system* was designed to be stable.... otherwise War Inc. would have destroyed it even more than it already has.
*The dimensions of the system are encrypted in the pyramids, along with the Sun and the speed of light... because priests of knowledge haven't always been Christians like Newton and Bacon and others seeking to enlighten sheeple and slaves. (Or like Tesla, seeking to invent and build things for others.)
What it amounts to:
After all, they're not even paying attention or literate within their own plane of existence. But God loves them, so there is that. In fact, occulted forms of intelligence and knowledge aside... that seems to be everything.
The Moon and the Sun, as it happens, are two of the roundest measured bodies in the Solar System. Neither is precisely a geometric sphere, of course, but the Sun comes closer than just about any natural object known to science.
(The Privileged Planet: How Our Place
in the Cosmos is Designed for Discovery
by Guillermo Gonzalez and Jay W. Richards :9)
The Sun is some four hundred times farther than the Moon, but it is also four hundred times larger. As a result, both bodies appear the same in our sky.
[...]
The Moon is just large enough to block the bright photosphere but not so large that it obscures the colorful chromosphere.
(Ib.)
...perfect solar eclipses are optimal for measuring a range of important phenomena, such as the solar flash spectrum, prominences, starlight deflection, and Earth's rotation. But even more than this, perfect solar eclipses provide great opportunities for discoveries about the Sun. Finally, besides inspiring awe and allowing us to discover the nature of the Sun's atmosphere.... perfect solar eclipses became the occasion for discovering the correlation between habitability and measurability itself, hardly an insignificant point.
*The dimensions of the system are encrypted in the pyramids, along with the Sun and the speed of light... because priests of knowledge haven't always been Christians like Newton and Bacon and others seeking to enlighten sheeple and slaves. (Or like Tesla, seeking to invent and build things for others.)
What it amounts to:
If I speak in the tongues of men or of angels, but do not have love, I am only a resounding gong or a clanging cymbal. If I have the gift of prophecy and can fathom all mysteries and all knowledge... but do not have love, I am nothing. --PaulBut that aside, with respect to the pyramids... they're still a pretty big symbol of occulted/hidden and "top secret" forms of knowledge for now. Not really sure why people into the occult bother at this point. Not much sense in trying to hide your supposed great knowledge of the Great Work in plain sight on this plane of existence if only a minute and certifiably crazy (It's official!) portion of the population is paying attention. Or if only a minute portion of the bimbo watching, fantasy football playing population has the capacity to see a different dimension to the games created for "the base" in the first place, huh?
After all, they're not even paying attention or literate within their own plane of existence. But God loves them, so there is that. In fact, occulted forms of intelligence and knowledge aside... that seems to be everything.
Thursday, September 18, 2014
More meaningless rambling...
Note what representatives of the Empire have said about "other nations" years ago:
So why not have the dumb trendies in Hollywood blame them and not peasants? It's an open question whether people in the corporate media are just utterly clueless and trendy (likely, just as one can count on Delaware Lemming) or have been Argoed (Possible, given that they're awarding each other for "wagging the dog" right in front of you at this point.).
Consider, how does an association between "climate change" and earth quakes in the corporate media even make sense?
(Danny Glover: Haiti Earthquake Caused By Global Warming)
(Danny Glover's Haiti Earthquake Theory | Fox News)
Get out your tin foil... because it looks almost like corporations.gov is at work on yet another Operation Witchcraft where they tend to wind up looting another nation and making a killing again. Overtly or covertly. Maybe they'll declassify the "covert" aspects of doing what they've often already done overtly in 50 years. And then it will be the official story that peasants can normalize.
But anyone interested could check for the usual in the meantime, so long as the net remains free and corporations.gov leaves an electronic footprint. E.g... simulations and drills, check:
Possible motive: (Haiti: Bonanza for Foreign Mining Companies
Interview with Marguerite Laurent / Ezili Dantò, Global Research)
But for most people nothing can be verified until official sources themselves tell them through their media. Yet even given the near total inability of most peasants to suspect their ruling class as the usual suspects... given all that's ALREADY been declassified and representatives of national security states saying, "Others are engaging even in an eco- type of terrorism whereby they can alter the climate..." in the background, one would think that they would at least wonder.
But apparently they're ready to take the blame for "climate change" no matter the evidence.... after all, peasants in an Empire were once convinced to sacrifice people in order to move the sun across the sky. Most likely due to the people closer to the top of the pyramid scheme that had a basic knowledge of... triangles, seriously... predicting eclipses. Most likely: "See the sun, it's about to be eaten!!! But now that you've let me terrorize you and sacrifice someone, everything is fine. Shew. Close call! Safety first!" It seems that there is nothing new under the sun. But I repeat myself, again.
There are some reports, for example, that some countries have been trying to construct something like an Ebola Virus, and that would be a very dangerous phenomenon, to say the least. Alvin Toeffler has written about this in terms of some scientists in their laboratories trying to devise certain types of pathogens that would be ethnic specific so that they could just eliminate certain ethnic groups and races; and others are designing some sort of engineering, some sort of insects that can destroy specific crops. Others are engaging even in an eco- type of terrorism whereby they can alter the climate, set off earthquakes, volcanoes remotely through the use of electromagnetic waves.So it's "other nations" seeking to "alter the climate."
So there are plenty of ingenious minds out there that are at work finding ways in which they can wreak terror upon other nations. It's real, and that's the reason why we have to intensify our efforts, and that's why this is so important. Link
So why not have the dumb trendies in Hollywood blame them and not peasants? It's an open question whether people in the corporate media are just utterly clueless and trendy (likely, just as one can count on Delaware Lemming) or have been Argoed (Possible, given that they're awarding each other for "wagging the dog" right in front of you at this point.).
Consider, how does an association between "climate change" and earth quakes in the corporate media even make sense?
(Danny Glover: Haiti Earthquake Caused By Global Warming)
(Danny Glover's Haiti Earthquake Theory | Fox News)
Get out your tin foil... because it looks almost like corporations.gov is at work on yet another Operation Witchcraft where they tend to wind up looting another nation and making a killing again. Overtly or covertly. Maybe they'll declassify the "covert" aspects of doing what they've often already done overtly in 50 years. And then it will be the official story that peasants can normalize.
But anyone interested could check for the usual in the meantime, so long as the net remains free and corporations.gov leaves an electronic footprint. E.g... simulations and drills, check:
The holding of pre-disaster simulations pertained to the impacts of a hurricane in Haiti. They were held on January 11. (Bob Brewin, Defense launches online system to coordinate Haiti relief efforts (1/15/10) — GovExec.com, complete text of article is contained in Annex) ... Upon completing the tests and disaster scenarios on January 11, TISC was considered to be, in relation to Haiti, in “an advanced stage of readiness”. On January 13, the day following the earthquake, SOUTHCOM took the decision to implement the TISC system, which had been rehearsed in Miami two days earlier: Global ResearchMeans. And possible evidence of other means: (UFO sightings caught on tape night before the Haiti, Youtube)
Possible motive: (Haiti: Bonanza for Foreign Mining Companies
Interview with Marguerite Laurent / Ezili Dantò, Global Research)
But for most people nothing can be verified until official sources themselves tell them through their media. Yet even given the near total inability of most peasants to suspect their ruling class as the usual suspects... given all that's ALREADY been declassified and representatives of national security states saying, "Others are engaging even in an eco- type of terrorism whereby they can alter the climate..." in the background, one would think that they would at least wonder.
But apparently they're ready to take the blame for "climate change" no matter the evidence.... after all, peasants in an Empire were once convinced to sacrifice people in order to move the sun across the sky. Most likely due to the people closer to the top of the pyramid scheme that had a basic knowledge of... triangles, seriously... predicting eclipses. Most likely: "See the sun, it's about to be eaten!!! But now that you've let me terrorize you and sacrifice someone, everything is fine. Shew. Close call! Safety first!" It seems that there is nothing new under the sun. But I repeat myself, again.
Meh, started rambling... 9/18
National sovereignty must be eliminated, as has essentially already happened in Europe. Within a few decades, the native Englishman will be a minority in his own country.
Maybe the Englishman. Although he will be expected to support a rather "non-multicultural" (Preemptive kill them! Etc.) form of Jewish nationalism, ironically. It's actually a little pathetic to see the usual trends unfold in different cultural petri dishes. The usual course of events seem to wind up with the goyim turning "antisemitic" enough to want their own forms of tribalism and nationalism again, especially when they figure out that many of the people leading the charge to globalism (capitalism) and internationalism (communism) practice their own form of tribalism.
I'm not saying it is right or wrong, only that tribalism doesn't seem to be going anywhere. Even for Europeans. The trends with respect to eliminating national sovereignty and nationalism in favor of the special interests of oligarchic international networks in Europe:
(Ukip's rise in the east of England: a world turned upside down)
(How Ukip's support has been evolving...)
(ANALYSIS: Could UKIP Win Up to 40 Seats in 2015?)
(Scottish Independence: What? - The Atlantic)
(Scottish independence vote puts British leaders on the line)
(Far-right National Front at 'gates of power' in France...)
(Support for France's National Front on the Rise...)
(New poll: Le Pen would defeat Hollande in France election...)
Facts, versus: National sovereignty must be eliminated, as has essentially already happened in Europe.
????
Many people have already stopped listening to oligarchs and Jews and apparently want their own forms of nationalism too. Not that they'll make a religion out of tribalism. But isn't the trend toward nationalism and not away from it? Even in America, books have already begun to appear and so on...
Of course, the left-wing media will tell him that “diversity is our strength.”
If the owners of the corporate media honestly believed that then they wouldn't keep censoring what goes on in the establishment of a "Jewish State" and within Jewish culture. If Donald "I'm not a racist." Sterling and the owners of the tribes/teams that provide entertainment
For example:How To Kill Goyim And Influence People -- Torat Ha'melech
After all, diversity would be their strength so they should be forced to do away with the forms of discrimination and racism or the "establishment of religion" (taking place on the side) upon which many are building a state.
Ironically, diversity may indeed be strength...
Maybe the Englishman. Although he will be expected to support a rather "non-multicultural" (Preemptive kill them! Etc.) form of Jewish nationalism, ironically. It's actually a little pathetic to see the usual trends unfold in different cultural petri dishes. The usual course of events seem to wind up with the goyim turning "antisemitic" enough to want their own forms of tribalism and nationalism again, especially when they figure out that many of the people leading the charge to globalism (capitalism) and internationalism (communism) practice their own form of tribalism.
I'm not saying it is right or wrong, only that tribalism doesn't seem to be going anywhere. Even for Europeans. The trends with respect to eliminating national sovereignty and nationalism in favor of the special interests of oligarchic international networks in Europe:
(Ukip's rise in the east of England: a world turned upside down)
(How Ukip's support has been evolving...)
(ANALYSIS: Could UKIP Win Up to 40 Seats in 2015?)
(Scottish Independence: What? - The Atlantic)
(Scottish independence vote puts British leaders on the line)
(Far-right National Front at 'gates of power' in France...)
(Support for France's National Front on the Rise...)
(New poll: Le Pen would defeat Hollande in France election...)
Facts, versus: National sovereignty must be eliminated, as has essentially already happened in Europe.
????
Many people have already stopped listening to oligarchs and Jews and apparently want their own forms of nationalism too. Not that they'll make a religion out of tribalism. But isn't the trend toward nationalism and not away from it? Even in America, books have already begun to appear and so on...
Of course, the left-wing media will tell him that “diversity is our strength.”
If the owners of the corporate media honestly believed that then they wouldn't keep censoring what goes on in the establishment of a "Jewish State" and within Jewish culture. If Donald "I'm not a racist." Sterling and the owners of the tribes/teams that provide entertainment
For example:How To Kill Goyim And Influence People -- Torat Ha'melech
After all, diversity would be their strength so they should be forced to do away with the forms of discrimination and racism or the "establishment of religion" (taking place on the side) upon which many are building a state.
Ironically, diversity may indeed be strength...
Wednesday, September 17, 2014
Rambling 9/17
Hagee's house and ranch sure are big, regardless... so apparently nationalism and Zionism are a successful mega church empire building strategy. Failing that, there's always Osteen's even more successful Happy Meal strategy. How nice!
Osteen, net worth $40 million. House: $10.5 million... federal reserve notes. View of Zionism or anything of significance in the world other than happy feelings? Priceless.
Hagee, net worth supposedly $5 million but John C. Hagee Royalty Trust provided a $5.5 million dollar ranch, etc. View from a former member of his church: "I don't even have a house! My kids grew up on top of each other like sardines. ... I just want a little house." She added, "I thought something was wrong with me. Why am I still [living like this]. I've given and given and given and tithed and tithed and tithed." Guess she didn't stand with Israel enough.
I'm not sure. But it seems like when people start with church empire building within the context of their civilization or marketing demographic... well, I'm not sure about that. "I'm the brand!" Marc Driscoll (reportedly) Then there are the trendies, they seem to be pretty good at marketing. So they have their own ideas about church building in the context of their culture. With all this going on, who is left to cultivate the culture? "Fundamentalists." I guess. But if Bill Gothard and others are any measure then they have their own problems. Sorry, just processing...
Osteen, net worth $40 million. House: $10.5 million... federal reserve notes. View of Zionism or anything of significance in the world other than happy feelings? Priceless.
Hagee, net worth supposedly $5 million but John C. Hagee Royalty Trust provided a $5.5 million dollar ranch, etc. View from a former member of his church: "I don't even have a house! My kids grew up on top of each other like sardines. ... I just want a little house." She added, "I thought something was wrong with me. Why am I still [living like this]. I've given and given and given and tithed and tithed and tithed." Guess she didn't stand with Israel enough.
I'm not sure. But it seems like when people start with church empire building within the context of their civilization or marketing demographic... well, I'm not sure about that. "I'm the brand!" Marc Driscoll (reportedly) Then there are the trendies, they seem to be pretty good at marketing. So they have their own ideas about church building in the context of their culture. With all this going on, who is left to cultivate the culture? "Fundamentalists." I guess. But if Bill Gothard and others are any measure then they have their own problems. Sorry, just processing...
Ramble 9/17
Rambling from here.
Besides playing with arts and crafts some, that might be about it. Or perhaps they could also learn something useful on the side, like how to make their own electric cars or grow their own hemp and medicine essentially for free. Or how to make a solar panel, how to garden, etc. Basically, at this point, a lot of the stuff that's being taught basically for free on the internet and Youtube.
The ruling class tends to take a special interest in creating, maintaining and monetizing a war on drugs, a war on terror and so forth. So "Common Core" for the commoners is probably going to be about educating the witless, football watching and fantasy football playing public of Team America, World Police on the Constitution, Declaration and the currency they're using... as well as their Democratic and Republican* history of rebelling against central banksters and their interests, right?
Nope. Probably not.
*Formerly Democratic and Republican... now that almost everyone seems to have been turned into Zionist RINOs and DINOs incapable of putting the interests of their own nation first. One could be forgiven for wondering if for all the aggression of the current establishment that they may still go the way of the Dodo sometime within our lifespans. Especially given that they can't even so much as pass a budget or plan for anything beyond the "optics" of being a political "pet" or "not a witch" tomorrow, etc. (Apparently.)
After all, apparently bird brained Dodos were a fat and aggressive species always looking to fight at one point too. They were probably even fairly dominant in their environment too. But where are they now?
Besides playing with arts and crafts some, that might be about it. Or perhaps they could also learn something useful on the side, like how to make their own electric cars or grow their own hemp and medicine essentially for free. Or how to make a solar panel, how to garden, etc. Basically, at this point, a lot of the stuff that's being taught basically for free on the internet and Youtube.
The ruling class tends to take a special interest in creating, maintaining and monetizing a war on drugs, a war on terror and so forth. So "Common Core" for the commoners is probably going to be about educating the witless, football watching and fantasy football playing public of Team America, World Police on the Constitution, Declaration and the currency they're using... as well as their Democratic and Republican* history of rebelling against central banksters and their interests, right?
Nope. Probably not.
*Formerly Democratic and Republican... now that almost everyone seems to have been turned into Zionist RINOs and DINOs incapable of putting the interests of their own nation first. One could be forgiven for wondering if for all the aggression of the current establishment that they may still go the way of the Dodo sometime within our lifespans. Especially given that they can't even so much as pass a budget or plan for anything beyond the "optics" of being a political "pet" or "not a witch" tomorrow, etc. (Apparently.)
After all, apparently bird brained Dodos were a fat and aggressive species always looking to fight at one point too. They were probably even fairly dominant in their environment too. But where are they now?
Tuesday, September 16, 2014
Rambling about local blogs...
Ramble.
Do "schools" in America even teach the trivium anymore? Probably not. Look at all these people... they are the best political animals (and pets, like Coons!) that the American oligarchy has to offer after they're groomed in supposedly elite schools and so forth. Little wonder that the clueless peasants below have been getting rather restless with their ruling class in recent years.
Looking to Obama as a person with god-like intelligence that would make everything better (Without liberals putting aside being trendy to actually try to tell the truth* about 911, etc.) was just another aspect of their progressively growing stupidity.
*Trendy... for instance, still waiting on the Pentagon to reveal geoengineering and weather weapons as the problem/reaction/solution to liberal ideas about "climate change. They've already begun trickling some information out merging the War Inc. on terror with "climate change." Meanwhile progressives seem to be once again acting like some witless form of controlled opposition. Apparently they don't want to be too much like "conspiracy theorists" and only a little bit "crazy" based on a "suckle on the teat of Mother Earth"/Leftist perspective where the feminine is idolized (Not half so subtly and "nuanced" as they imagine, either.) . So they trend along in that direction, usually pretty much thoroughly controlled by trends of information in the corporate.gov/media.mil... and then they wonder why all their hope for change turns into hopium without much, if any, real "change." What did you expect, a free solar powered pony? Is that what your military industrial complex and multinational corporations are running on or policing the world based on? Progressives couldn't even focus on the facts of Operation Iraqi Liberation/OIL, when foreign interests hijacked your military industrial complex for their own ends and transitioned from the "Cold War" to the "War on Terror." It's supposed to be a new epoch of war in a New American Century. If you're into that sort of thing.
Apparently all trendy progressives can do is point to conservatives and argue that's another whole realm of basically being clueless. But seriously, so what? Delaware Liberal and Delaware Politics should merge... after all, what are you really disagreeing about? (Biden's supposed nudism... wow... just when one would think that it couldn't get any more useless, local conservatives and progressives begin debating the supposed nudism of Joe "the buffoon" Biden. Is he a buffoon or is that just an act? If all the world is a stage and the show must go on, does it matter?)
Conservatives want to borrow ponzi into existence out of nothing from a private banking cartel to spend on the military to nation build in Israel (mainly) and other nations (Where what they do looks suspiciously like nation destroying. Was that Operation Freedumb and Dumbocracy* or Operation Fooled Again?) Progressives want to borrow ponzi into existence out of nothing to nation build in their own nation, supposedly. But then it turns out that they do not do that and usually can rather easily be terrorized back into nation destroying in the name of nation building, due to the "war on terror." (They'll probably be passing another "patriot act" soon enough. After all, for progressives and conservatives these days... patriotism is an act. More entertainment.)
*Progressives and conservatives may say or think, "If only he wasn't anti-Semitic.. If only he wasn't Islamophobic. If only he didn't criticize Christian Zionism. If only he wasn't so anti-American. f only this fellow wasn't sarcastic. If only he was nice, then I might agree.... or somethin'." Keep telling yourselves that. You're the people supporting starving over 500,000 Iraqi children to death and so forth based on supporting "Operation Oops" bringing them yet more Freedumb and Dumbocracy. So there is all that going on in the background, to this day. (Still waiting on Israel to contribute to bombing ISIS in their "war on terror" in the region. Have they signed on to the coalition to bomb Iraq, once again, yet?)
Anyway, it seems to me that a little sarcasm won't kill any of you.
Do "schools" in America even teach the trivium anymore? Probably not. Look at all these people... they are the best political animals (and pets, like Coons!) that the American oligarchy has to offer after they're groomed in supposedly elite schools and so forth. Little wonder that the clueless peasants below have been getting rather restless with their ruling class in recent years.
Looking to Obama as a person with god-like intelligence that would make everything better (Without liberals putting aside being trendy to actually try to tell the truth* about 911, etc.) was just another aspect of their progressively growing stupidity.
*Trendy... for instance, still waiting on the Pentagon to reveal geoengineering and weather weapons as the problem/reaction/solution to liberal ideas about "climate change. They've already begun trickling some information out merging the War Inc. on terror with "climate change." Meanwhile progressives seem to be once again acting like some witless form of controlled opposition. Apparently they don't want to be too much like "conspiracy theorists" and only a little bit "crazy" based on a "suckle on the teat of Mother Earth"/Leftist perspective where the feminine is idolized (Not half so subtly and "nuanced" as they imagine, either.) . So they trend along in that direction, usually pretty much thoroughly controlled by trends of information in the corporate.gov/media.mil... and then they wonder why all their hope for change turns into hopium without much, if any, real "change." What did you expect, a free solar powered pony? Is that what your military industrial complex and multinational corporations are running on or policing the world based on? Progressives couldn't even focus on the facts of Operation Iraqi Liberation/OIL, when foreign interests hijacked your military industrial complex for their own ends and transitioned from the "Cold War" to the "War on Terror." It's supposed to be a new epoch of war in a New American Century. If you're into that sort of thing.
Apparently all trendy progressives can do is point to conservatives and argue that's another whole realm of basically being clueless. But seriously, so what? Delaware Liberal and Delaware Politics should merge... after all, what are you really disagreeing about? (Biden's supposed nudism... wow... just when one would think that it couldn't get any more useless, local conservatives and progressives begin debating the supposed nudism of Joe "the buffoon" Biden. Is he a buffoon or is that just an act? If all the world is a stage and the show must go on, does it matter?)
Conservatives want to borrow ponzi into existence out of nothing from a private banking cartel to spend on the military to nation build in Israel (mainly) and other nations (Where what they do looks suspiciously like nation destroying. Was that Operation Freedumb and Dumbocracy* or Operation Fooled Again?) Progressives want to borrow ponzi into existence out of nothing to nation build in their own nation, supposedly. But then it turns out that they do not do that and usually can rather easily be terrorized back into nation destroying in the name of nation building, due to the "war on terror." (They'll probably be passing another "patriot act" soon enough. After all, for progressives and conservatives these days... patriotism is an act. More entertainment.)
*Progressives and conservatives may say or think, "If only he wasn't anti-Semitic.. If only he wasn't Islamophobic. If only he didn't criticize Christian Zionism. If only he wasn't so anti-American. f only this fellow wasn't sarcastic. If only he was nice, then I might agree.... or somethin'." Keep telling yourselves that. You're the people supporting starving over 500,000 Iraqi children to death and so forth based on supporting "Operation Oops" bringing them yet more Freedumb and Dumbocracy. So there is all that going on in the background, to this day. (Still waiting on Israel to contribute to bombing ISIS in their "war on terror" in the region. Have they signed on to the coalition to bomb Iraq, once again, yet?)
Anyway, it seems to me that a little sarcasm won't kill any of you.
Friday, September 12, 2014
Pentagon
National Journal: The planned cuts to the Pentagon's budget put the U.S. military on a dangerous course with too few resources to fight, a majority of National Journal's National Security Insiders say.
"The threat is increasing as our defenses atrophy," one Insider said. "Nation-building at home is not a national security strategy."
I had to read that a few times. It's almost as if this is a satire of "insider traders."
Nation building at home is not a national security strategery? So then, what is the strategy? Nation building the whole world first... or just nation building Israel and then everyone else first?
That's going well.
The Pentagon's plan accepts the right degree of risk, but sequestration poses real dangers for America and the world.
At this point the Pentagon should probably just issue their own currency and call it the hexagon. That way they could incorporate putting a hex on everyone incorporated in their "budget."
Why don't they just issue their own currency directly, since they're generally in charge of getting more ponzi created through War Inc. while policing the world for global corporations formed out of it?
What's the hold up with the Pentagon issuing a hex as currency instead of going through all the rigamarole of having Congress borrow national debt/money into existence from a private banking cartel, to give to the Pentagon to lose? 8.5 trillion doled out. 2.3 trillion "unaccounted" for.
Isn't the so-called "national debt" being created and brokered by bankers and their business partners in Congress only 17 trillion?
"The threat is increasing as our defenses atrophy," one Insider said. "Nation-building at home is not a national security strategy."
I had to read that a few times. It's almost as if this is a satire of "insider traders."
Nation building at home is not a national security strategery? So then, what is the strategy? Nation building the whole world first... or just nation building Israel and then everyone else first?
That's going well.
The Pentagon's plan accepts the right degree of risk, but sequestration poses real dangers for America and the world.
At this point the Pentagon should probably just issue their own currency and call it the hexagon. That way they could incorporate putting a hex on everyone incorporated in their "budget."
We’ve repeatedly documented that military waste and fraud are the core problems with the U.S. economy.
For example, we’ve noted that we wouldn’t be in this crisis of hitting the debt ceiling in the first place if we hadn’t spent so much money on unnecessary wars … which are horrible for the economy.
But it goes far beyond actual fighting. We could easily slash the military and security budget without reducing our national security.
For example, homeland security agencies wasted money on seminars like “Did Jesus Die for Klingons Too?” and training for a “zombie apocalypse” instead of actually focusing on anti-terror efforts.
Republican Senator Tom Coburn notes that the Department of Defense can reduce $67.9 billion over 10 years by eliminating the non-defense programs that have found their way into the budget for the Department of Defense.
BusinessWeek and Bloomberg point out that we could slash military spending without harming our national security. Indeed, we could slash boondoggles that even the generals don’t want.
BusinessWeek provides a list of cost-cutting measures which will not undermine national security. American Conservative does the same.
Moreover, we’ve shown that the military wastes and “loses” (cough) trillions of dollars. See this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this and this.
The former Secretary of Defense acknowledged in May 2012 that the DOD “is the only major federal agency that cannot pass an audit today.” The Pentagon will not be ready for an audit for another five years, according to Panetta.
“$8.5 TRILLION In Taxpayer Money Doled Out By Congress To The Pentagon Since 1996 … Has NEVER Been Accounted For”If they don't focus on accountability and "nation-building at home" instead of among corrupt Arab tribalists and religious fanatics as a national security strategy soon, there may not be much of a "nation" left to support their budgets and full faith and credit in the debt/money it's based on.
Why don't they just issue their own currency directly, since they're generally in charge of getting more ponzi created through War Inc. while policing the world for global corporations formed out of it?
What's the hold up with the Pentagon issuing a hex as currency instead of going through all the rigamarole of having Congress borrow national debt/money into existence from a private banking cartel, to give to the Pentagon to lose? 8.5 trillion doled out. 2.3 trillion "unaccounted" for.
Isn't the so-called "national debt" being created and brokered by bankers and their business partners in Congress only 17 trillion?
Thursday, September 11, 2014
Delaware Liberal and the national myth of 911
Their perspective:
Shrug. At least they get it partially right. Maybe that counts for something, although it doesn't seem to count for anything.
If they could stop hitting the hopium then they'd focus on the utterly bungled anthrax attacks through which Zionists meant to link Iraq to 911 in order to carry out their geopolitical plans for the MidEast. Misguided? Try fraudulent.
With respect to the geopolitical plans of Zionists, that's a process that is continuing to this day. At least they're too scared to try anything as significant as the anthrax attacks now. (The fact that they were bungled might have something to do with that.) Although if any sort of a suitable pretext for their "special interests" in War Inc. arose, like the WMDs in Syria or ISIS... then that will do for now.
The web is sticky and significant "changes" may be on the horizon, so let the record show where Delaware Liberal stood on the issue of 911 truth and justice.
...let’s make a point of remembering those who gave their lives in a misguided war that used 9/11 as an excuse — a war that we still find ourselves cleaning up after. Link
Shrug. At least they get it partially right. Maybe that counts for something, although it doesn't seem to count for anything.
If they could stop hitting the hopium then they'd focus on the utterly bungled anthrax attacks through which Zionists meant to link Iraq to 911 in order to carry out their geopolitical plans for the MidEast. Misguided? Try fraudulent.
With respect to the geopolitical plans of Zionists, that's a process that is continuing to this day. At least they're too scared to try anything as significant as the anthrax attacks now. (The fact that they were bungled might have something to do with that.) Although if any sort of a suitable pretext for their "special interests" in War Inc. arose, like the WMDs in Syria or ISIS... then that will do for now.
The web is sticky and significant "changes" may be on the horizon, so let the record show where Delaware Liberal stood on the issue of 911 truth and justice.
Humorous
9/11 truth also infiltrated The Daily Kos, a CIA-Zionist left-gatekeeper rag that explicitly prohibits discussion of any non-mainstream version of 9/11. A clever woman named Katherine Smith published a facetious piece entitled “9/11 Truthers are Dummies” which parodies the usual moronic attack pieces of untruthers and disinfo artists. (She explains her real views of 9/11, which she is not allowed to publish at Daily Kos, here.)
Veterans Today
Lol... hope people make it through today without getting Pan icky.
new mcguire
soros fund revealed to have heavily increased short position of late: http://blogs.marketwatch.com/need-to-know/2014/08/15/does-george-soros-k...
according to my illuminati decoder ring, global market crash is 'chao' needed for the 'ordo ab chao'..
scotland is jumping the gun... unless the coordinated global terror attacks are to happen today..
which would be right on time by numerology standards..
see how crazy they made us think?!
Wednesday, September 10, 2014
Stupid is as stupid does...
new whotookmyalias
Europe to Poland: You can't let them treat us like this, go demand an explanation!
Poland to Russia: Why are you treating us like this?
Russia: Because you are stupid.
Poland: We are not stupid!
Russia, putting hand in front of concrete wall: Yes you are. I'll show you. Here hit my hand as hard as you can.
Poland rears back and punches at Russia's hand as hard as it can. At the last second Russia pulls their hand away and Poland's fist smashes into the wall getting all bruised and bloodied.
Russia: See, I told you!
Poland goes back to Europe.
Europe: Well, what did they say?
Poland: They said it's becuase we are stupid
Europe: We are not stupid, how can you let them say that?
Poland, putting its hand in front of its own face: Yes we are, I'll show you. Here hit my hand.
Tuesday, September 09, 2014
Monday, September 08, 2014
Interesting comment..
new Xibalba
D. Orlov nailed it:
Because if Russia invaded on Thursday morning, this is what the situation on the ground would look like by Saturday afternoon.
1. Ukrainian artillery fell silent almost immediately. They are no longer shelling residential districts of Donetsk and Lugansk. This is because their locations had been pinpointed prior to the operation, and by Thursday afternoon they were completely wiped out using air attacks, artillery and ground-based rocket fire, as the first order of business. Local residents are overjoyed that their horrible ordeal is finally at an end.
2. The look of military activity on the ground in Donetsk and Lugansk has changed dramatically. Whereas before it involved small groups of resistance fighters, the Russians operate in battalions of 400 men and dozens of armored vehicles, followed by convoys of support vehicles (tanker trucks, communications, field kitchens, field hospitals and so on). The flow of vehicles in and out is non-stop, plainly visible on air reconnaissance and satellite photos. Add to that the relentless radio chatter, all in Russian, which anyone who wants to can intercept, and the operation becomes impossible to hide.
3. The Ukrainian military has promptly vanished. Soldiers and officers alike have taken off their uniforms, abandoned their weapons, and are doing their best to blend in with the locals. Nobody thought the odds of the Ukrainian army against the Russians were any good. Ukraine's only military victory against Russia was at the battle of Konotop in 1659, but at the time Ukraine was allied with the mighty Khanate of Crimea, and, you may have noticed, Crimea is not on Ukraine's side this time around.
4. There are Russian checkpoints everywhere. Local civilians are allowed through, but anyone associated with a government, foreign or domestic, is detained for questioning. A filtration system has been set up to return demobilized Ukrainian army draftees to their native regions, while the volunteers and the officers are shunted to pretrial detention centers, to determine whether they had ordered war crimes to be committed.
5. Most of Ukraine's border crossings are by now under Russian control. Some have been reinforced with air defense and artillery systems and tank battalions, to dissuade NATO forces from attempting to stage an invasion. Civilians and humanitarian goods are allowed through. Businessmen are allowed through once they fill out the required forms (which are in Russian).
6. Russia has imposed a no-fly zone over all of Ukraine. All civilian flights have been cancelled. There is quite a crowd of US State Department staffers, CIA and Mossad agents, and Western NGO people stuck at Borispol airport in Kiev. Some are nervously calling everyone they know on their satellite phones. Western politicians are demanding that they be evacuated immediately, but Russian authorities want to hold onto them until their possible complicity in war crimes has been determined.
7. The usual Ukrainian talking heads, such as president Poroshenko, PM Yatsenyuk and others, are no longer available to be interviewed by Western media. Nobody quite knows where they are. There are rumors that they have already fled the country. Crowds have stormed their abandoned residences, and were amazed to discover that they were all outfitted with solid gold toilets. Nor are the Ukrainian oligarchs anywhere to be found, except for the warlord Igor Kolomoisky, who was found in his residence, abandoned by his henchmen, dead from a heart attack. (Contributed by the Saker.)
8. Some of the over 800,000 Ukrainian refugees are starting to stream back in from Russia. They were living in tent cities, many of them in the nearby Rostov region, but with the winter coming they are eager to get back home, now that the shelling is over. Along with them, construction crews, cement trucks and flatbeds stacked with pipe, cable and rebar are streaming in, to repair the damage from the shelling.
9. There is all sorts of intense diplomatic and military activity around the world, especially in Europe and the US. Military forces are on highest alert, diplomats are jetting around and holding conferences. President Obama just held a press conference to announce that “We don't have a strategy on Ukraine yet.” His military advisers tell him that his usual strategy of “bomb a little and see what happens” is not likely to be helpful in this instance.
10. Kiev has surrendered. There are Russian tanks on the Maidan Square. Russian infantry is mopping up the remains of Ukraine's National Guard. A curfew has been announced. The operation to take Kiev resembled “Shock and Awe” in Baghdad: a few loud bangs and then a whimper.
Armed with this list, you too should be able to determine whether or not Russia has invaded Ukraine last Thursday.
http://cluborlov.blogspot.com/2014/08/how-can-you-tell-whether-russia-ha...
Ramble 9/8
"Arab migration has been the best thing that’s happened to Europe in the past 50 years. Arabs in Europe are a fact of life. It’s time we started to accept that there’s no way to block the migration of Chinese, Pakistanis or Arabs to Europe. … It’s true, Europe won’t be what it once was, but that’s a good thing. … [The] more migrants from Africa and Asia who arrive, the better off Europe will be. Sooner or later, their children and grandchildren will marry into veteran European families and change the demographics of their countries. Europe will be different. It will not be the Europe that sank into the most extreme form of racism in world history; the Europe that inflicted horrors on the human race.”
Yigal Ben-Nun, Israeli Writer.
http://whitegenocideproject.com/what-anti-whites-say/
Besides the interests of the oligarchy that is the governing philosophy in Europe. So the very white Europeans that defeated the Nazis are looked on suspiciously by Zionists and therefore expected to "change the demographics of their countries." Israelis are not expected to change the demographics in their nation to the same extent* in order to prevent another Holodomor motivated predominately by tribal, ethnic hatred.
It's becoming the governing philosophy in America too.
*"We must not act as if we are different from the rest of humanity in today’s global village. We are strong enough to stop acting as a distinctive race and to start being a normal nation, without ethnic, religious or gender segregation." Yigal Ben-Nun
Note the logic. When you're weak or when there's an economic/banking collapse then it's fine to go tribal/Jewish and act as a "distinctive race." So apparently once white people have put up with enough crime and victimization then they can go tribal or racial and demand to have their interests represented in their own nations again? Trying to answer these questions matters because until UKIP takes over, this is the governing philosophy. I.e. some sort of multicultural Zio/Oligarchy policing the supposed rules of tribalism. "...the Europe that inflicted horrors on the human race.” True, in a way. But he's missing the fact that Jews have inflicted horrors on the human race too. So what are the rules? Would that justify massive immigration from Arab states into the Jewish state?
Yigal Ben-Nun, Israeli Writer.
http://whitegenocideproject.com/what-anti-whites-say/
Besides the interests of the oligarchy that is the governing philosophy in Europe. So the very white Europeans that defeated the Nazis are looked on suspiciously by Zionists and therefore expected to "change the demographics of their countries." Israelis are not expected to change the demographics in their nation to the same extent* in order to prevent another Holodomor motivated predominately by tribal, ethnic hatred.
It's becoming the governing philosophy in America too.
*"We must not act as if we are different from the rest of humanity in today’s global village. We are strong enough to stop acting as a distinctive race and to start being a normal nation, without ethnic, religious or gender segregation." Yigal Ben-Nun
Note the logic. When you're weak or when there's an economic/banking collapse then it's fine to go tribal/Jewish and act as a "distinctive race." So apparently once white people have put up with enough crime and victimization then they can go tribal or racial and demand to have their interests represented in their own nations again? Trying to answer these questions matters because until UKIP takes over, this is the governing philosophy. I.e. some sort of multicultural Zio/Oligarchy policing the supposed rules of tribalism. "...the Europe that inflicted horrors on the human race.” True, in a way. But he's missing the fact that Jews have inflicted horrors on the human race too. So what are the rules? Would that justify massive immigration from Arab states into the Jewish state?
Friday, September 05, 2014
Ramble 9/5
First, you need to recognize the logical defect in conspiracy
theories, why they are (rightly) discredited, and why no one listens to
or cares about conspiracy theories.
It’s partly due to the fact that an aspect of covert operations (aka conspiracies) is to do something and have it remain “top secret,” at least until everyone involved is dead.
So it’s important to discredit conspiracy theories about Operation This and That and portray them all as equally crazy. That way anyone with shared interests can say, “Conspiracy theory.” So if Operation Gladio type scenarios started to take place on the border in order to frame right wing militias and harm the Right in America, Nobody would “investigate” and conclude that an actual investigation is all just “conspiracy theories.” After all, he’s primed and ready to see the right wing as terrorists anyway. Biden is already calling the Tea Party terrorists, etc. This would all have to be accounted for and go into the game theory through which a highly organized plot could form. Provided no one bungled it. Although they probably would. Not that it would matter, given Nobody’s epistemic inertia. After all, he already knows that the right wing are basically terrists.
Another thing that insiders could do is just make sure that the atrocity and terrorism is big enough and that the initial narrative is set quickly. Rapid disinformation and then let the trendy lemmings settle into their usual Right vs. Left patterns of misinformation to begin calling each other terrorists and so on, never looking at the oligarchic birds of prey above them. After all, that’s too scary. And they’re already terrorized.
Plus some “conspirators” do not have to be witting participants in a conspiracy, depending on their level of intelligence. Are you a conspirator decades later when you argue that the USS Liberty probably deserved to be sunk? No. But you’re a known cultural or tribal sort of pattern, so you can be counted on to at least try to turn a blind eye. And here you are, going beyond the call of duty.
People working in the corporate media can also be trended, given that many are already trendy crackheads and careerists with no use for actual investigative journalism:
It’s partly due to the fact that an aspect of covert operations (aka conspiracies) is to do something and have it remain “top secret,” at least until everyone involved is dead.
So it’s important to discredit conspiracy theories about Operation This and That and portray them all as equally crazy. That way anyone with shared interests can say, “Conspiracy theory.” So if Operation Gladio type scenarios started to take place on the border in order to frame right wing militias and harm the Right in America, Nobody would “investigate” and conclude that an actual investigation is all just “conspiracy theories.” After all, he’s primed and ready to see the right wing as terrorists anyway. Biden is already calling the Tea Party terrorists, etc. This would all have to be accounted for and go into the game theory through which a highly organized plot could form. Provided no one bungled it. Although they probably would. Not that it would matter, given Nobody’s epistemic inertia. After all, he already knows that the right wing are basically terrists.
Another thing that insiders could do is just make sure that the atrocity and terrorism is big enough and that the initial narrative is set quickly. Rapid disinformation and then let the trendy lemmings settle into their usual Right vs. Left patterns of misinformation to begin calling each other terrorists and so on, never looking at the oligarchic birds of prey above them. After all, that’s too scary. And they’re already terrorized.
Plus some “conspirators” do not have to be witting participants in a conspiracy, depending on their level of intelligence. Are you a conspirator decades later when you argue that the USS Liberty probably deserved to be sunk? No. But you’re a known cultural or tribal sort of pattern, so you can be counted on to at least try to turn a blind eye. And here you are, going beyond the call of duty.
People working in the corporate media can also be trended, given that many are already trendy crackheads and careerists with no use for actual investigative journalism:
Wisner recruited Philip Graham from The Washington Post to run the project within the industry. According to Deborah Davis in Katharine the Great; “By the early 1950s, Wisner ‘owned’ respected members of The New York Times, Newsweek, CBS and other communications vehicles.”[3]
In 1951, Allen W. Dulles persuaded Cord Meyer to join the CIA. However, there is evidence that he was recruited several years earlier and had been spying on the liberal internationalist organizations he had been a member of in the late 1940s.[4] According to Deborah Davis, Meyer became Mockingbird’s “principal operative.”[5] –Wikipedia Operation Mockingbird. Operation This, Operation That. These days, I guess it would have to be Operation Freedumb, huh? Anderson Cooper, on the job! Etc. Speaking of him, apparently Sandy Hook has been compartmentalized and classified after people were terrorized there… nothing to see, move along:
1. Who directed the New Haven Federal Bureau of Investigation field office to classify the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting (SHES)? 2. Why and for what reason would the FBI classify the SHES shooting when they did not classify the Columbine shooting which also was an Active Shooter Mass Casualty Incidents (AS/MCI)?Now the Port-A-Potties are apparently top secret too????
3. Who on was the Incident Commander as required by the Federal Emergency Management Agency in directing the AS/MCI at SHES?
• Who at the Incident Command Center made the ordering of Port-A-Potties a high priority since they were delivered within three hours of the school shooting? ….
• When I called the Port-A-Pottie company, after searching for over a week as to who they were and when they were ordered, I was told this information was classified and they are not allowed to share that information with me. Link
Seriously. And you guys are still talking about 911 and how to prevent another 911. Lol.
Apparently no one but the crazy conspiracy theorists are “crazy” enough to be capable of asking any questions about anything. All the crackheads and trendies in the corporate media are apparently too busy hoping that an official source takes a leak on them to actually investigate anything. Given this situation I guess it’s a good thing that covert operations are all in the past and everyone involved is probably dead, huh? Otherwise one might begin to think that covert operations (aka conspiracies) might be ongoing to this day.
In any event, the process of declassifying old conspiracies continues… and then it’s no longer a conspiracy theory because it’s a “conspiracy fact.” Which is why it’s silly to go into defense lawyer mode (and not a very good one) over Operation Northwoods.
But as you keep saying about Operation Northwoods, apparently declassification happens once rich and powerful people are all dead. (Peasants can be forgiven for wondering exactly whose security, “national” security is about.)
Among many other defects, conspiracy theories substitute POSSIBILITY for PROOF.
You seem to be conflating your own theories about the influence of Bormann’s Nazi gold in politics (as opposed to the FACTS about AIPAC and Zionist ponzi, etc.) and the supposed Muslim Manchurian (As opposed to the FACT that his first chief of staff served in the IDF, etc.) candidate… with better and more verifiable theories based on facts and evidence.
You often substitute possibilities for proof and evidence when trying to make a case, like a lawyer. And with respect to evidence, where is your evidence that the joint chiefs didn’t want war with Cuba and therefore didn’t really want to stage terrorist attacks like they kept saying they did?
“The Joint Chiefs of Staff believe that the United States can undertake military intervention in Cuba without risk of general war” he continued. “They also believe that the intervention can be accomplished rapidly enough to minimize communist opportunities for solicitation of UN action.” However; what Lemnitzer was suggesting was not freeing the Cuban people, who were largely in support of Castro, but imprisoning them in a U.S. military-controlled police state. “Forces would assure rapid essential military control of Cuba,” he wrote. “Continued police action would be required.” Concluding, Lemnitzer did not mince words: “[T]he Joint Chiefs of Staff recommend that a national policy of early military intervention in Cuba be adopted by the United States. They also recommend that such intervention be undertaken as soon as possible and preferably before the release of National Guard and Reserve forces presently on active duty.” LinkHas some memo been declassified that reads: “We were all just kidding around to avoid a war.”
The actual evidence all seems to align with an actual theory, as opposed to your own conspiracy theory that they were all secretly conspiring to actually avoid war:
Because of the secrecy and illegality of Operation Northwoods, all details remained hidden for forty years. Lemnitzer may have thought that all copies of the relevant documents had been destroyed; he was not one to leave compromising material lying around. Following the Bay of Pigs debacle, for example, he ordered Brigadier General David W Gray, Craig’s predecessor as chief of the Cuba project within the JCS, to destroy all his notes concerning Joint Chiefs actions and discussions during that period. Gray’s meticulous notes were the only detailed official records of what happened within the JCS during that time. According to Gray, Lemnitzer feared a congressional investigation and therefore wanted any incriminating evidence destroyed. With the evidence destroyed, Lemnitzer felt free to lie to Congress. [....]All of that aside, most Cubans would probably have been better off with the establishment of a McCuba Inc. and incorporation in the Israeli/American Empire.
Even after Lemnitzer lost his job, the Joint Chiefs kept planning “pretext” operations at least into 1963. Among their proposals was a deliberately create a war between Cuba and any of a number of .n American neighbors. This would give the United States military an excuse to come in on the side of Cuba’s adversary and get rid of “A contrived ‘Cuban’ attack on an OAS [Organization of Americas] member could be set up,” said one proposal, “and the attacked state could be urged to ‘take measures of self-defense and request ice from the U.S. and OAS; the U.S. could almost certainly obtain necessary two-thirds support among OAS members for collective action against Cuba.”
Among the nations they suggested that the United States secretly were Jamaica and Trinidad-Tobago. Both were members of the Commonwealth; thus, by secretly attacking them and then blaming Cuba, the United States could lure England into the war Castro. The report noted, “Any of the contrived situations de above are inherently, extremely risky in our democratic system in which security can be maintained, after the fact, with very great difficulty. If the decision should be made to set up a contrived situation it be one in which participation by U.S. personnel is limited only to the most highly trusted covert personnel. This suggests the infeasibility of the use of military units for any aspect of the contrived situation.” Ib.
At least for a while… who knows what the future holds?
Because American peasants are already feeling it some.
Thursday, September 04, 2014
Interesting tidbit... not that it really makes much difference. Still ridiculous that America has a Holocaust Memorial and not a Slave Memorial.
Time for an historic fact that no one wants to own: It was a black man's insistence that he owned another man that resulted in slavery in the US. Slavery was an African tradition - it did not exist in England or the Colonies. Blacks brought to the colonies as indentured servants had been slaves in Africa. They had been conquered in tribal wars or had unpaid debts or had been sold by their parents. Europeans traded rum, spice and other goods with the tribal chiefs in exchange. Once in the colonies they were indentured servants just like their English counterparts and would be freed once their contract period was up.
Anthony Johnson arrived in Jamestown in 1621 as an indentured servant from Angola - where he had been a slave. At the end of his contract he was freed and was given land. One of his indentured servants was a man named John Casor. Expecting to be released from his indenture, Casor arranged to work for a white neighbor, Robert Parker. Anthony Johnson went to court claiming that Casor was not a servant but a slave, owned for life. The court ruled in Johnson's favor.
On 8 March 1655, John Casor of Virginia, a former 'indentured servant' of Virginia, became the first person to be legally declared a slave for life. Link
Wednesday, September 03, 2014
Tuesday, September 02, 2014
Ramble 9/2
Nudists have (stupid) feelings too, so apparently all they need to do is organize. Is it merely a matter of sniveling about things enough create trends for cultural trendies that are also ruled and defined by their feelings as American civilization declines? Because if it is then next thing you know he could be supporting creating laws to protect a nudist orientation.... provided enough victimization propaganda, etc.
The identity politics that are used to create trends in the culture are not rational or humanist. They don't promote the general welfare or well being for all. It's merely trendy, entertaining and generally destructive to civilization and therefore "well being" in general. Results can be off shored for now, due to the reserve status of the petrodollar and the mountains of debt/money that people use to buy into being happy and gay before heading the way of the Dodo or killing themselves.
Or they can invest petrodollars in estrogen treatments to change* from male to female. But that's about the extent of it. It's not sustainable. It's just trendy for now. If the reserve currency fails then the US government will most likely fail and then scenarios like the Golden Dawn in Greece open up as people look for the forms of masculinity typical to militias, etc.
*Small ramble. In a culture of clueless trendies one can change their sex but never change from gay to straight... because that's impossible. Is that an absolute in a world of supposed relativity? Interesting. Apparently the belief is that one can choose your biology but not your feelings... that are themselves due to the innate characteristics of sex and biology. In other words, your feelings are oriented in an immutable way to an immutable and biological characteristic in others. But actually, sex itself is mutable based on... feelings. Etc. Probably just happenstance again.
Because apparently abject rebellion against Nature's God is just the way things emerge from the void by happenstance and emerge from our brains like excrement out the other end. Imagine that! Not to mention that whatever happens or can be observed in biology, it's all perfectly predictable based on evolution... as well as the exact opposite too. In fact, every single thing that has ever been observed in biology has been predicted by evolution. That's because it's a theory with vast explanatory power, see?
Its explanatory power is so vast that one can hardly even see it!
Just kidding. Sometimes I like imagining things like pseudo-scientists with their unfalsifiable forms of hypothetical goo and the third rate philosophers that seem to like wallowing around in it. I mean... it's always fun to imagine* things, isn't it? Well, provided that one doesn't get a bit too carried away and cite your own imagination as the equivalent of a scientific theory. Or begin to think that merely imagining things about the past has something to do with what can be observed in biology here and now.
*(What you just wrote due to your "ape like" brains? That's an artifact of the vestigial remains of some ancient ape-like creatures right there. It's probably because they wanted to mate with each other. Actually... it's probably the result of the "gill slits" when you were an embryo and your brains got a little jumbled with the gills, by happenstance. Or something like that.)
The identity politics that are used to create trends in the culture are not rational or humanist. They don't promote the general welfare or well being for all. It's merely trendy, entertaining and generally destructive to civilization and therefore "well being" in general. Results can be off shored for now, due to the reserve status of the petrodollar and the mountains of debt/money that people use to buy into being happy and gay before heading the way of the Dodo or killing themselves.
Or they can invest petrodollars in estrogen treatments to change* from male to female. But that's about the extent of it. It's not sustainable. It's just trendy for now. If the reserve currency fails then the US government will most likely fail and then scenarios like the Golden Dawn in Greece open up as people look for the forms of masculinity typical to militias, etc.
*Small ramble. In a culture of clueless trendies one can change their sex but never change from gay to straight... because that's impossible. Is that an absolute in a world of supposed relativity? Interesting. Apparently the belief is that one can choose your biology but not your feelings... that are themselves due to the innate characteristics of sex and biology. In other words, your feelings are oriented in an immutable way to an immutable and biological characteristic in others. But actually, sex itself is mutable based on... feelings. Etc. Probably just happenstance again.
Because apparently abject rebellion against Nature's God is just the way things emerge from the void by happenstance and emerge from our brains like excrement out the other end. Imagine that! Not to mention that whatever happens or can be observed in biology, it's all perfectly predictable based on evolution... as well as the exact opposite too. In fact, every single thing that has ever been observed in biology has been predicted by evolution. That's because it's a theory with vast explanatory power, see?
Its explanatory power is so vast that one can hardly even see it!
Just kidding. Sometimes I like imagining things like pseudo-scientists with their unfalsifiable forms of hypothetical goo and the third rate philosophers that seem to like wallowing around in it. I mean... it's always fun to imagine* things, isn't it? Well, provided that one doesn't get a bit too carried away and cite your own imagination as the equivalent of a scientific theory. Or begin to think that merely imagining things about the past has something to do with what can be observed in biology here and now.
*(What you just wrote due to your "ape like" brains? That's an artifact of the vestigial remains of some ancient ape-like creatures right there. It's probably because they wanted to mate with each other. Actually... it's probably the result of the "gill slits" when you were an embryo and your brains got a little jumbled with the gills, by happenstance. Or something like that.)
Diane Feinstein
Diane Feinstein, who sits on the Senate Intelligence committee, was quite good on her Meet the Press appearance.
Dianne Feinstein: Obama “Too Cautious” On ISIS
I realize that most people here are so degraded that they don't even care about having their own national interests represented first, second and third... but is Diane Feinstein a dual citizen? Was Netanyahu "too cautious" on ISIS when he said not to bomb them because the enemy of his enemies is his friend?
And why didn't Diane "Mr. and Mrs. America, turn in your guns... because I want to give them to Islamists!" Feinstein go to the corporate media and rabble rouse for bombings when ISIS was traveling in easily bombed convoys.... if she's known for decades that they would kill with abandon?
Apparently it's now, once Netanyahu's "When the enemy of your enemy is fighting, leave them be." rabid dog is apparently jerking at its leash too far that Zionists like Feinstein show up in the corporate media to market their war on terror again. Where were they when Syrians were getting their hearts eaten?
And this psychopathic husk of a person is apparently being interviewed by Andrea Michell, the wife of Alan Greenspan... is this an internal debate among Zionists about how best to manage the goyim/tribes? What's next on Feinstein's agenda, a "hard hitting" interview with Wolf "AIPAC lobbyist" Blitzer over at CNN? Internal dialogues. That's all you seem to be being entertained by. Aren't you curious about what's really happening in the world, though?
The irony of it is that it's not just Arab tribes that oligarchic Zionists are interested in managing. They want to manage you too. Feinstein in that interview, if it can be called that: "I sat on the intelligence committee since before 911." Indeed. You did, didn't you?
Andrea Mitchell is not an investigative journalist, apparently she's more of a public relations representative for a multinational tribe and the multinational corporations that "the 1%" own and operate.
Indeed Feinstein she is well-versed on her task and she impresses me with her span of knowledge.
At least Zionists like you in "the base" (Not flushed like the toilet of Arab goyim yet, shew.) wind up being right about the need to kill some Arab goyim/"sons of camels" now and again. It's true. They are terrible and their cultures are usually backward, tribal and generally crazy. So there is that. So now you're going to recommend sharing intelligence with the Syrian air force and support strong secular Arab nations in the region, right? No? The enemy of your enemy isn't your frenemy? Waiting on Netanyahu and Feinstein to tell you what to do?
Anyway, the philosophy of gathering Islamic terrorists into organizations like "Al Qaeda"/the toilet and then deciding to flush the toilet might even be correct at times. HOWEVER, before this point*.... Zionists like John McCain let a rabid dog run wild in the region on purpose.
*(Where your own president is said to be weak or tripping over his own red lines and so on as in the Syria/Iran debacle of a pretext of a prelude to bombing. Supposedly we're supposed to celebrate because Jewish/mainstream media is finally allowing carefully handled "Well Andrea, I wouldn't quite say that!" attacks on Obama into "mainstream" news.)
How could you know that "Rabid dog on a leash... and now running wild..." is basically what they did, just as easily as I do? Because Zionists just told you not to bomb but then it turns out that American Zionists are supposed to bomb the "sons of camels" later. Duh. Not to mention that they've written strategy papers about it, etc. (That's strategery, for those of you that apparently like coming home to your closed open air war memorials. Not enough debt/money for the veterans or to keep your own war memorials open. But there's billions available for Israel and bombs and trying to manage the Arab goyim in the MidEast. Let's watch Andrea Mitchell interview Alan Greenspan as to why that is next.... from the bedroom? Shiver.)
Seriously. Does Andrea Mitchell supposedly "interviewing" Diane Feinstein really look like anything other than a controlled internal dialogue to anyone?
Imagine Andrea Mitchell going outside of her oligarchic culture to ask: "What do you think about arming and strengthening Assad in order to stop ISIS and protect Syrian Christians from terrorists?" Or perhaps: "What do you think about securing America's borders, building a wall like Israel's over the border and into Mexico... and generally leaving others alone in order to focus on nation building in American cities?" Or perhaps Feinstein going outside of her cultural box to say: "Well Andrea, why don't you ask Alan Greenspan if he thinks that enough money can be created out of nothing to finance a wall to protect Americans from your war of terror?"
Etc. Andrea Mitchell is not an investigative journalist and it's doubtful that Diane "Mr. and Mrs. America, turn in your guns." Feinstein even identifies with Mr. and Mrs. American. Yet you expect to know the truth about what's going on in the world based on the corporate media and culturally internal/controlled dialogues like that? (I had to look it up on Youtube. )
Dianne Feinstein: Obama “Too Cautious” On ISIS
I realize that most people here are so degraded that they don't even care about having their own national interests represented first, second and third... but is Diane Feinstein a dual citizen? Was Netanyahu "too cautious" on ISIS when he said not to bomb them because the enemy of his enemies is his friend?
And why didn't Diane "Mr. and Mrs. America, turn in your guns... because I want to give them to Islamists!" Feinstein go to the corporate media and rabble rouse for bombings when ISIS was traveling in easily bombed convoys.... if she's known for decades that they would kill with abandon?
Apparently it's now, once Netanyahu's "When the enemy of your enemy is fighting, leave them be." rabid dog is apparently jerking at its leash too far that Zionists like Feinstein show up in the corporate media to market their war on terror again. Where were they when Syrians were getting their hearts eaten?
And this psychopathic husk of a person is apparently being interviewed by Andrea Michell, the wife of Alan Greenspan... is this an internal debate among Zionists about how best to manage the goyim/tribes? What's next on Feinstein's agenda, a "hard hitting" interview with Wolf "AIPAC lobbyist" Blitzer over at CNN? Internal dialogues. That's all you seem to be being entertained by. Aren't you curious about what's really happening in the world, though?
The irony of it is that it's not just Arab tribes that oligarchic Zionists are interested in managing. They want to manage you too. Feinstein in that interview, if it can be called that: "I sat on the intelligence committee since before 911." Indeed. You did, didn't you?
Andrea Mitchell is not an investigative journalist, apparently she's more of a public relations representative for a multinational tribe and the multinational corporations that "the 1%" own and operate.
Indeed Feinstein she is well-versed on her task and she impresses me with her span of knowledge.
At least Zionists like you in "the base" (Not flushed like the toilet of Arab goyim yet, shew.) wind up being right about the need to kill some Arab goyim/"sons of camels" now and again. It's true. They are terrible and their cultures are usually backward, tribal and generally crazy. So there is that. So now you're going to recommend sharing intelligence with the Syrian air force and support strong secular Arab nations in the region, right? No? The enemy of your enemy isn't your frenemy? Waiting on Netanyahu and Feinstein to tell you what to do?
Anyway, the philosophy of gathering Islamic terrorists into organizations like "Al Qaeda"/the toilet and then deciding to flush the toilet might even be correct at times. HOWEVER, before this point*.... Zionists like John McCain let a rabid dog run wild in the region on purpose.
*(Where your own president is said to be weak or tripping over his own red lines and so on as in the Syria/Iran debacle of a pretext of a prelude to bombing. Supposedly we're supposed to celebrate because Jewish/mainstream media is finally allowing carefully handled "Well Andrea, I wouldn't quite say that!" attacks on Obama into "mainstream" news.)
How could you know that "Rabid dog on a leash... and now running wild..." is basically what they did, just as easily as I do? Because Zionists just told you not to bomb but then it turns out that American Zionists are supposed to bomb the "sons of camels" later. Duh. Not to mention that they've written strategy papers about it, etc. (That's strategery, for those of you that apparently like coming home to your closed open air war memorials. Not enough debt/money for the veterans or to keep your own war memorials open. But there's billions available for Israel and bombs and trying to manage the Arab goyim in the MidEast. Let's watch Andrea Mitchell interview Alan Greenspan as to why that is next.... from the bedroom? Shiver.)
Seriously. Does Andrea Mitchell supposedly "interviewing" Diane Feinstein really look like anything other than a controlled internal dialogue to anyone?
Imagine Andrea Mitchell going outside of her oligarchic culture to ask: "What do you think about arming and strengthening Assad in order to stop ISIS and protect Syrian Christians from terrorists?" Or perhaps: "What do you think about securing America's borders, building a wall like Israel's over the border and into Mexico... and generally leaving others alone in order to focus on nation building in American cities?" Or perhaps Feinstein going outside of her cultural box to say: "Well Andrea, why don't you ask Alan Greenspan if he thinks that enough money can be created out of nothing to finance a wall to protect Americans from your war of terror?"
Etc. Andrea Mitchell is not an investigative journalist and it's doubtful that Diane "Mr. and Mrs. America, turn in your guns." Feinstein even identifies with Mr. and Mrs. American. Yet you expect to know the truth about what's going on in the world based on the corporate media and culturally internal/controlled dialogues like that? (I had to look it up on Youtube. )
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)