What if they just simulated some of the chips weakening steel columns and changed variables until their simulation weakened them enough to "explain" everything else that was observed? Apparently that would be a scientific investigation, from some perspectives. And from your simulated perspective it seems clear that you wouldn't need a "red layer of the chips" painted on during asbestos abatement work, given that all you would in some cases would be "office fires." Perhaps when NIST demonstrates, experimentally, that office fires can essentially "cut through" thick structural steel columns then AE911 types will be obligated to put a "red layer of the chips" or thermite on some columns to demonstrate that it can "cut through" them in the same way?
Ironic: "If you insist on experimental testing to prove anything...." (There again, maybe that's not really evidence of irony and it's just a simulation of being ironic.)
Is it possible for "experimental evidence" to prove anything about thermite in the first place? If they did take some of the chips and weakened steel with it (perhaps to the same extent as apparent furnaces of fire that can be generated with office furniture alone, etc.), then what? I suspect that your quasi-magical standard for supposed experimental evidence ("Office fires... yeah." vs. "Thermite, impossible!") and verifiability/falsifiability isn't what you seem to be imagining it is.
So what are you supposedly imagining that you would conclude if they actually did take a "red layer of the chips" and "cut through" or weakened steal with it? It seems unlikely that you would necessarily then be capable of imagining that thermite was used on 911 and therefore begin to be able to look for or at lines of evidence that it was, in fact, used.
You also added claims about the hijackers and all the rest to try to show that a simulation of an investigation has been entirely sufficient, case closed. The conclusion of the official story being that evidence of thermite or any other incendiary or use of explosives generally need not or cannot be looked for in the first place. Yet those claims were basically all false, so false assumptions seem to be shaping your view of any evidence that thermite may have been used. With respect to thermite and the technical details of finding evidence of its use, what would be a reason to look for evidence of thermite in the first place and what would subsequently look like evidence that it had been found?
Right. You argue that if they "cut through" a beam with it then the official story would be falsified. Curious that you don't have the same experimental standards for the imaginary furnaces of fire that can apparently be created out of office furniture and donuts, though. Would you also want NIST to stop running simulations long enough to demonstrate their claims experimentally as well?
That's it from Metabunk.
Bollyn.com
But here is some investigative journalism on the same topic: As the application of the super-thermite must have occurred during the months prior to 9-11, I have used FOIA and other means to try to find who could have been doing such work in the towers during 2000-2001. There was one significant clue at the very beginning. Two days after 9-11, Engineering News-Record (ENR) reported that an asbestos abatement and demolition company called LVI had done extensive asbestos abatement work in the World Trade Center:
AMEC Inc., Turner Corp. and Bovis Lend Lease were set to assume "lead roles" in the cleanup effort, says Lee Benish, AMEC vice president. "From the very beginning, we've been deeply involved with the city department of emergency services," he says. "They're sorting through who will be doing what." LVI Services Inc., New York City, which has done extensive asbestos abatement work on the towers in the past, is involved in similar work now as well as other cleanup efforts.
LVI was immediately a suspect because it does a great deal of pre-demolition work in which it prepares buildings for demolition. LVI has done several large demolition jobs with Controlled Demolition, Inc. of Maryland.
Partin concluded: “The Murrah Federal Building was not destroyed by one sole truck bomb. The major factor in its destruction appears to have been detonation of explosives carefully placed at four critical junctures on supporting columns within the building. The only possible reinforced concrete structural failure solely attributable to the truck bomb was the stripping out of the ceilings of the first and second floors in the ‘pit’ area behind columns B4 and B5. Even this may have been caused by a demolition charge at column B3. It is truly unfortunate that a separate and independent bomb damage loads of debris were hauled away, smashed down, and covered with dirt behind a security fence . . . All ambiguity with respect to the use of supplementing demolition charges and the type of truck used could be quickly resolved if the FBI were required to release the surveillance camera coverage of this terribly tragic event.” (www.whatreallyhappened.com/RANCHO/POLITICS/OK/PARTIN/ok2.htm)
Soon after the explosion, Controlled Demolition Inc. was called in to destroy those parts of the building which had remained standing, and to speedily dispose of all the rubble of the building.
This, of course, prefigures the blatant tampering with a crime scene which became the hallmark of Mayor Giuliani’s approach to the World Trade Center, again using CDI.
(Tarpley, Webster Griffin (2012-04-12). 9/11 Synthetic Terror)
The same sort of MLK incentives that whites in America had to end it. It’s curious how most people justify terrorism while playing pretend that it’s always wrong simply because it’s terrorism. Turns out that’s not the case.
Even Mandela apparently wasn’t all rainbows either, as he kept on justifying terrorism against other terrorists:
I’m not sure how a man that at one point seems to have been surrounded by Jewish “antisemitic” in some racial way. I guess antisemitism means different things to different people depending on their perceptions of “race” and understanding of rabbinic ideas in which ideologies and religions can supposedly be wrapped around or based on perceptions of race and tribe.
Ironic:
At least Netanyahu didn’t say that he wouldn’t go because Mandela was a “”"”"terrrorist.”"”"” Whatever happened to the war on terror, anyway? It seems like it’s never going to end.
Ramble:
Netanyahu on terrorism: “We tried to call ahead when we were going to blow people up. That’s the type of stuff we do, probably because we’re superior.” Arguments like that show the extent of the ideologies of supremacy and racism involved in Netanyahu’s terrorism. I’m not sure what Mandela’s excuses were for his but they could probably be as good as Netanyahu’s.
In any event, at least Mandela apparently changed his mind later or was willing to engage in the theatrical production of changing his mind with the rainbows of tolerance and all the rest of it. Ironic that he actually remained on a terrorist watch list in the Masonic/Talmudic U.S./Israeli Conglomeration Inc. of a “JudeoChristian nation” until 2008.
I wonder if he had to have his underpants checked for WMDs. There again, we all did thanks to Chertoff:
Lol. And there’s the fusion of financial terrorism, banksterism and the supposed prevention of terrorism through the financing of the warfare side of the welfare/warfare state again. At least Americans can stand back and let $afety First Inc. or representatives of Israeli corporations (That kept saying “We won’t outsource our national security.” after the Syria/Iran situation went kaput.) stop any future underwear bombers. Safety. Shew.
There are probably a few patriots left in the NSA/CIA/FBI somewhere. Here’s to hoping that they try to do their jobs WITH THEIR FELLOW AMERICANS IN MIND and not their careers in mind, not Turkish interests in mind, not Saudi interests and not even Israeli interests either. I.e. Israeli interests that apparently have more “dual citizen” representation in America than any other foreign interest, etc. The FBI/CIA/NSA need to do their actual jobs like Sibel Edmonds and other whistle blowers have been trying to… etc. It’s already having an effect on the corrupt degenerates within the oligarchical structures being produced by the Federal Reserve Inc. and the banking cartel. (I.e. structures that tend to put foreign interests and global corporations before the interests of the American people, etc.)