But “they” are not Jews. And the “controlled narratives” are not controlled by Jews.
When you’re successfully getting people fired that have been working
in the corporate media for over thirty years, that’s control.
Here is another example:
Helen Thomas Comes Under Fire for Remarks on Jews, Israel
CBS News
Jun 7, 2010 – After making controversial remarks about Israel, longtime
White House correspondent Helen Thomas has been dropped by her speaking …
Juxtaposition, criticizing Whites will not get you fired in the corporate media in America:
They just refer to him as a liar. I’ve got to believe
it’s ethnic with these people. They just got a problem with this guy
being President. Is there any other evidence to justify why they keep
calling him a bad man?”
— Host Chris Matthews on MSNBC’s Hardball, June 5, 2013. –
MATTHEWS: How about Palin? Let’s talk about Palin. Palin has attacked
New York, Washington and Los Angeles. She goes after the government,
after the media, after Hollywood.
KATHLEEN PARKER, syndicated columnist: Yes.
MATTHEWS: Anything that’s on the coast is evil to her. She’s an Alaskan
who, I bet you any money, is going to spend most of her time down in the
middle parts of the country, the rural white parts. She’s going to find
those cul de sacs of whitedom, and exploit the hell out of them, right?
— Exchange aired on MSNBC’s Hardball, August 5, 2009
It’s not anti-Jew. It’s usually anti-White.
Saudi Arabia and Iran are gearing up to go to war with ISIS. It has nothing to do with Jews.
There is order coming out of Islamic and Arabic chaos based on the
Oded Yinon plan and empires have always used proxy armies of
terrorists/savages. Indeed, that’s an aspect of how America itself was
born as a nation. Now it seems that next to nothing gets done in the
Empire if it isn’t kosher first and foremost, imperial interests are
usually second.
Go back and read Washington’s farewell address again…
You might be able to make a case that “they” — companies that profit from war — want to stir up war.
That’s not who actually did it. Neoconservative Zionists did it.
They did the Niger forgeries that were so crappy that they had a dead
guy’s signature on them.
Maybe in the past there’s a case to be made for this or that. But that’s not what happened recently.
Interesting juxtaposition on even more recent events if you’re
interested, the Malaysian airliner that was shot down recently vs. the
USS Liberty. What happened? What’s the difference?
I would argue that wars take a long time to generate and incite on
the theatrical production of the world stage, so you don’t have to be
“Shakespear” to see saber rattling as a form of communication.
Therefore you could pretty much have a nation shooting down planes or trying to sink ships
but if it’s not the “right” nation that people are looking for a
pretext for war with then it doesn’t matter. There is not necessarily
an international incident unless factions want to use an event as a
pretext that they’re often looking for long before the event actually
takes place.
So let’s say that this imaginary Russian sub that you guys are
posting about here now actually wasn’t imaginary and instead it surfaced
and blew up “the British” trawler! Yep. It just blew it up! Then
what? Then what are you imagining should have been done based on that
imaginary event?
You’re “escalating tensions” over real or imagined submarines without
investigating the way a plane was actually shot down first. It wasn’t
nearly shot down in someone’s imagination. It WAS shot down. But you cannot escape the reality that the news media is ANTI-JEW and ANTI-ISRAEL and pro-Muslim.
It’s
generally anti-White. Everyone else has lobby groups and PR firms
working for them these days, from the Arab Institute to Asians.
Apparently Whites have allowed these patterns to emerge in their nations
because they’re “rugged individualists” off trying to haul on their
bootstraps or something and they also are “Jewed” out with minority
propaganda according to many Jews. Whatever the reason, it’s only
happening in White nations. There is no push for diversity in Japan,
that would happen to ethnically cleanse the Japanese out of existence.
Why? Who knows!
Can you cite any evidence at all? What are you talking about, the American media is anti-Jew? I don’t even get it anymore.
But this obviously means something to you based on your Indiana Jones and the Last Jewish Movie
type of worldview, I guess. What is it that you mean, exactly? How
are you perceiving people in the media to be anti-Jewish if they lose
their decades long jobs and careers if they so much as say the word….
Jew?
Someone may control the news media and Hollywood.
Yeah. It’s probably the people that own it and/or create and
produce Europhobic movies about antisemitism instead of dealing with the
fact that many in their own group, as Jews, wanted to “die”versify
Europeans with “minorities” that happen to be Muslims. I’ve seen this
myself. No sooner does a Jewish Zionist perceive that White European
women might not be supporting their state sufficiently and: “I hope
you’re raped by Muslims!” I guess I should have taken a screenshot.
But it seems like you’re impervious to new information anyway. We seem
to be opposites.
Turkey is as close to Israel as Iran. it just on the other side of Syria.
So apparently your argument is that the Jewish owned media in America
(And the brain dead White trendies working in it, picture one asking
Obama his favorite color.) is not reporting Erdogan’s statements…
because they hate Jews? They know about his statements and thought it
would be a great story suitable to mainstream narratives like their
anti-Iranian “lost in translation” type stuff but then: “No… I won’t
report on Turkey because I hate Jews!”
????
I don’t know what your argument is unless one group of Jews supposedly hates the another group of Jews or something.
You cannot escape the reality that the news media, like Hollywood, is anti-Jew…
The news media? Compare and contrast any stories about Catholic
pedophiles with the story of how rabbis are giving babies herpes and
common rabbinic abuses. Where is Bill Maher to make the joke? How
quickly would he be fired if he did make that joke? Does the media
ever investigate the kosher racket? Would they investigate if Catholics
wanted to stamp a tiny little cross on most food and charge people for
the privilege of imposing their religion with the help of the FDA?
Numerous juxtapositions between different groups can be multiplied
based on observable evidence and it seems to me that’s the only way to
define whether the corporate media in America is anti or pro a group. I
would argue that it’s anti-White and generally pro-Jew/minority even
when minorities are actually the majority and oligarchic Jews are
actually almost running the nation. How long can the people that are
actually running things or becoming a majority keep on blaming America
as being representative of a majority White, Christian nation?
Anyway, where is your actual evidence that the media is “anti-Jew”?
And the “controlled narratives” are not controlled by Jews.
When you’re successfully getting people fired that have been working in the corporate media for over thirty years, that’s control.
Here is another example:
Juxtaposition, criticizing Whites will not get you fired in the corporate media in America:
It’s not anti-Jew. It’s usually anti-White.
Saudi Arabia and Iran are gearing up to go to war with ISIS.
It has nothing to do with Jews.
There is order coming out of Islamic and Arabic chaos based on the Oded Yinon plan and empires have always used proxy armies of terrorists/savages. Indeed, that’s an aspect of how America itself was born as a nation. Now it seems that next to nothing gets done in the Empire if it isn’t kosher first and foremost, imperial interests are usually second.
Go back and read Washington’s farewell address again…
You might be able to make a case that “they” — companies that profit from war — want to stir up war.
That’s not who actually did it. Neoconservative Zionists did it. They did the Niger forgeries that were so crappy that they had a dead guy’s signature on them.
Maybe in the past there’s a case to be made for this or that. But that’s not what happened recently.
Interesting juxtaposition on even more recent events if you’re interested, the Malaysian airliner that was shot down recently vs. the USS Liberty. What happened? What’s the difference?
I would argue that wars take a long time to generate and incite on the theatrical production of the world stage, so you don’t have to be “Shakespear” to see saber rattling as a form of communication.
Therefore you could pretty much have a nation shooting down planes or trying to sink ships but if it’s not the “right” nation that people are looking for a pretext for war with then it doesn’t matter. There is not necessarily an international incident unless factions want to use an event as a pretext that they’re often looking for long before the event actually takes place.
So let’s say that this imaginary Russian sub that you guys are posting about here now actually wasn’t imaginary and instead it surfaced and blew up “the British” trawler! Yep. It just blew it up! Then what? Then what are you imagining should have been done based on that imaginary event?
You’re “escalating tensions” over real or imagined submarines without investigating the way a plane was actually shot down first. It wasn’t nearly shot down in someone’s imagination.
It WAS shot down.
But you cannot escape the reality that the news media is ANTI-JEW and ANTI-ISRAEL and pro-Muslim.
It’s generally anti-White. Everyone else has lobby groups and PR firms working for them these days, from the Arab Institute to Asians. Apparently Whites have allowed these patterns to emerge in their nations because they’re “rugged individualists” off trying to haul on their bootstraps or something and they also are “Jewed” out with minority propaganda according to many Jews. Whatever the reason, it’s only happening in White nations. There is no push for diversity in Japan, that would happen to ethnically cleanse the Japanese out of existence. Why? Who knows!
Can you cite any evidence at all? What are you talking about, the American media is anti-Jew? I don’t even get it anymore.
But this obviously means something to you based on your Indiana Jones and the Last Jewish Movie type of worldview, I guess. What is it that you mean, exactly? How are you perceiving people in the media to be anti-Jewish if they lose their decades long jobs and careers if they so much as say the word…. Jew?
Someone may control the news media and Hollywood.
Yeah. It’s probably the people that own it and/or create and produce Europhobic movies about antisemitism instead of dealing with the fact that many in their own group, as Jews, wanted to “die”versify Europeans with “minorities” that happen to be Muslims. I’ve seen this myself. No sooner does a Jewish Zionist perceive that White European women might not be supporting their state sufficiently and: “I hope you’re raped by Muslims!” I guess I should have taken a screenshot. But it seems like you’re impervious to new information anyway. We seem to be opposites.
Turkey is as close to Israel as Iran. it just on the other side of Syria.
So apparently your argument is that the Jewish owned media in America (And the brain dead White trendies working in it, picture one asking Obama his favorite color.) is not reporting Erdogan’s statements… because they hate Jews? They know about his statements and thought it would be a great story suitable to mainstream narratives like their anti-Iranian “lost in translation” type stuff but then: “No… I won’t report on Turkey because I hate Jews!”
????
I don’t know what your argument is unless one group of Jews supposedly hates the another group of Jews or something.
You cannot escape the reality that the news media, like Hollywood, is anti-Jew…
What is a Jew?
Because here’s nearly two hours of Jewish Hollywood, apparently observable: Hollywoodism: The Ideology that has Devoured Western Culture
The news media? Compare and contrast any stories about Catholic pedophiles with the story of how rabbis are giving babies herpes and common rabbinic abuses. Where is Bill Maher to make the joke? How quickly would he be fired if he did make that joke? Does the media ever investigate the kosher racket? Would they investigate if Catholics wanted to stamp a tiny little cross on most food and charge people for the privilege of imposing their religion with the help of the FDA?
Numerous juxtapositions between different groups can be multiplied based on observable evidence and it seems to me that’s the only way to define whether the corporate media in America is anti or pro a group. I would argue that it’s anti-White and generally pro-Jew/minority even when minorities are actually the majority and oligarchic Jews are actually almost running the nation. How long can the people that are actually running things or becoming a majority keep on blaming America as being representative of a majority White, Christian nation?
Anyway, where is your actual evidence that the media is “anti-Jew”?