Delaware Politics 9/2

The model for what some people are trying to do here seems to be Ferguson, yet:

The import of the report on the shooting is not so much that Darren Wilson was and is innocent.

The most important significance lies in the fact that large numbers of Blacks engaged in a campaign of lies and disinformation with a racial agenda of seeking the jailing and perhaps execution of a man they knew to be innocent.

They did this because Wilson is White. They had immediately sided with Brown because of their racial identity.

Had a collection of White witnesses to a shooting incident between a Black cop and a White civilian gotten together to concoct a false story with the intent of railroading the Black cop and stirring up racial violence that led to the deaths of two Black cops, what would have happened?

After all, conspiracies of this nature are criminally actionable on both a federal and a local level.

Isn’t it a “well-duh” that these hypothetical White liars who had produced a mirror image of what transpired with Black liars in Ferguson would be having some very unpleasant dates with a pack of Federal prosecutors in the grand jury room in St. Louis, Missouri?

And deservedly so?

The Occidental Observer

Ferguson is bad for their group:

St. Louis prosecuting attorney Robert McCulloch made it clear that some of the testimony implicating Officer Wilson was wildly at odds with the facts of the case. To put it charitably, these people saw what they wanted to see, and the Black underclass and the Black activists went all in with that narrative.   Obama’s statement that the anger was “understandable” is outrageous since the anger flies in the face of the evidence.   ....

White America watching the TV coverage once again had its stereotypes of the Black underclass confirmed — irrational, violent, White-hating, and prone to criminality. Implicitly at least, there will be an uptick in race realism.
Ib.

It's interesting to observe White people these days. 

Much like Jewish ethnic nationalists/"racists," White Judeo-Christian conservatives like Mr. Moseley seem to be continually doing one thing while saying another.  There is usually quite a contrast between their plays, dreams, fantasies, politics/entertainment and reality.  So they come back year after year a little more angry about how their own thinking* has been a failure, again.

*Summarizing:  "Jews exist as a group, everyone else is a deracinated mass of diversity governed by corrupt oligarchs subject to the Jewish elite."  Another way of putting it:

There’s a very simple litmus test for whether “tribalist” White America really ran the United States: There would be far less immigration and European-Americans would not be on the verge of becoming a vulnerable minority, against their will, in the very country which their ancestors founded for them.

 But if the White majority does not rule America, well then, who does? The short ancestor is a deracinated corporate oligarchy which is about one third Jewish and whose Jewish component is unbelievably over-represented in the critical choke points of influence: the news and entertainment media, the financing of political campaigns, and presidential administrations generally. That little clique forms the “tribalists” which Blair, Bush, and Obama have to pander to, certainly not Western publics in general.
(Ethnic activist and “Constitutional crusader” Glenn Greenwald demands lawlessness on immigration
by
Guillaume Durocher)

  I actually like Glenn Greenwald and Noam Chomsky some.

But perhaps they need to be put into a little redirection of the "culture of critique" too.  Whether it be political freedumbs or entertainment in a dumbocracy, which is all becoming the same thing... who are all these critics?