Where are all their articles about that? "We should... this and that."
We? He has a totally separate perspective based on Jewish nationalism and what is good for the Jews first, before Syrians or Europeans and Americans.
His agenda is the subversion of nationalism/"Nazism" in Europe and getting rid of Syrian nationalists. So he recommends that Europeans take in more refugees, destabilizing resistance to the very Jewish supremacy that causes Europeans to bomb Syrians. Something that these Jews (and you, to the extent that you agree with them.) have no business whatsoever doing, supporting, or turning a blind eye to.
But then he comes full circle and argues that European countries or European derived countries should accept more refugees, following up his tribal activism by invoking the Holocaust without looking at the way that his tribe incited wars in the past.
/During World War II, the U.S. turned away Jews due to security concerns. We sent shiploads back to the camps../
This is false. Many were turned away due to the influence of Jewish nationalists, given that they had signed off on a Transfer Agreement with the National Socialists in order to create a Jewish State. It wouldn't have done any good for Jews to do everything they did in WWI and WWII and then not have Jews herded along to the Jewish State.
If he's concerned about Syrians (Jews seem to have a funny way of showing concern for us "goyim," of any sort.) then he should sell everything he has and go help them. If the Jewish State is based on helping refugees, then they should accept every Syrian refugee and give them a vote.
No comments:
Post a Comment