Tuesday, May 06, 2014

Ramble 5/6 2

While I don’t believe in the capacity of humans to organize great conspiracies, I do believe in the power of people moving in the same direction spontaneously when they share common interests.

So people educated to think of themselves in tribal terms would be likely to conspire based on the original roots of the term conspiracy itself.  Naturally breathing together.  Or like the Mossad whistle blower said, never turning them in.  A 30% recruitment rate but a 100% failure to blow the whistle, as he eventually did. 

Not that it matters if 1% blow the whistle given other forms of tribal censorship that comes about naturally based on ownership and control over large corporations.  Not that trendy journalists will necessarily investigate anything anyway.  But even if they did finally investigate something instead of reading a "main stream" of information off their teleprompters, there is the fact that they are owned in the background.  For that matter, even if they aren't... there's always the self-censorship of a culture that's been shaped by Judaic factions.  E.g. Carl Cameron's report on the dancing Israelis being scrubbed at Fox News Inc., a network for patriotic goy that are even almost allowed to be nationalists or almost allowed to try to establish a state based on nationalism and religion like Judaics are already doing.  (With your financial support... even if you are "bankrupt" and probably in need of being IMF'd like a Third World nation now according to Greenspan/Bernanke and now, Yellen.  Goyim?)         

As one of the dancing Israelis of 911 put it:  "Give us twenty years and we'll control your media."  Etc.  Here is the FBI report due to a FOIA request... don't expect to see it reported on in the corporate media generally owned by the 70% of tribe members that couldn't be recruited directly by the Mossad but that never seem to blow the whistle on them.         

On a side note, it's interesting how often the tribal nature of Judaism and its exceptionally secular versions play a role in an idiotic "mainstream" story but isn't really emphasized and drawn out, given that trendy reporters in the Media Inc. are generally so degraded that they can't really follow through and investigate.  They have to stop or self censor before they get to the whole truth or the big picture that a story resides in.  And besides that, there's only so much time to read their teleprompters.  For instance, the Don Sterling stuff recently:
DS: It's the world! You go to Israel, the blacks are just treated like dogs.

    V: So do you have to treat them like that too?

    DS: The white Jews, there's white Jews and black Jews, do you understand?

    V: And are the black Jews less than the white Jews?

    DS: A hundred percent, fifty, a hundred percent.

    V: And is that right?

    DS: It isn't a question—we don't evaluate what's right and wrong, we live in a society. We live in a culture. We have to live within that culture.

    V: But shouldn't we take a stand for what's wrong? And be the change and the difference?

    DS: I don't want to change the culture, because I can't. It's too big and too [unknown].
    V: But you can change yourself.

    DS: I don't want to change. If my girl can't do what I want, I don't want the girl. I'll find a girl that will do what I want! Believe me. I thought you were that girl—because I tried to do what you want. But you're not that girl.

V: It's like saying, "Let's just persecute and kill all of the Jews."

DS: Oh, it's the same thing, right?

V: Isn't it wrong? Wasn't it wrong then? With the Holocaust? And you're Jewish, you understand discrimination.

DS: You're a mental case, you're really a mental case. The Holocaust, we're comparing with—

V: Racism! Discrimination.

DS: There's no racism here.  (Dead Spin)
After all, he's an owner of debt/money slaves and a special victim of history for thousands of years.  Therefore he cannot be a racist, given that he's never been shown how the tribe he identifies with (probably incorrectly) has practiced and monetized the tribalism and racism of goyim throughout history.

But back to Delaware...  what if all the foreign aide that is currently being sent to Israel was used to build or subsidize more sustainable forms of energy in Delaware?  Or strengthen the grid in case of a solar flare?  Or to build a natural gas infrastructure to allow peasants to take advantage of cheap natural gas?  Or to avoid being "bankrupt"?  Or perhaps to hire Booker T. Washington type teachers to go into Wilmington and build up some sort of a sustainable black civilization?  Despite all the Beyonces and Jay Zs of the world it could be done, given that Booker T. already did it.

There are many things that could be done instead of supporting a fairly racist, apartheid state or continuing in a petrodollar fueled partnership with the Saudis and then sending the money to the Israelis. 

Note that a Jewish state was (past tense) empowered by both JudeoChristians and Jewish culture in the European nations too, it's not just AIPAC.  The only way that it can empower itself now is by blowing stuff up again or causing or framing more "antisemitism" in order to herd more people that consider themselves Jewish (for whatever reason) along into it.  Risking World War.  All the usual stuff.  There's even the Sampson Option if they really go crazy about a decline in power and influence.  (What do I mean by decline, given how powerful they are as a faction?  I mean that we wouldn't even know about half the stuff I just mentioned if their power wasn't already on the decline.  Blame Obama for it, I guess.  As if he was the change he was looking for and the internet had nothing to do with it.) 

With respect to the Sampson Option and Lindsey Graham and the Israelis (and you) basically threatening us with nukes, I guess we'll see how it goes.  If you're really concerned about it, then support stopping all foreign aide to Israel and the Saudis.         

No comments: