It's like a combination of the multiple stream media and the main stream too. Because the main stream has good central systems for predicting the weather but it doesn't include all "possible" lines of information at this point.
For example: HAARPstatus.com
I'm not sure the physics of it add up.
ironically, it's more likely than the main stream of information being presented to
people by the corporate media. Apparently people like to entertain
themselves with the idea of driving a different car to change
the temperature of the entire planet while preventing imaginary
catastrophes in the future too. (????)
If we are to imagine that then I just changed the
temperature of the entire planet to a small degree by breathing. (It's
such a small degree that you can't even see it.) But the catastrophic result, it's a big
disaster! So then I just took a deep breath and prevented a big disaster to
some small, invisible degree too. Imagine that! Now, who will pay me a
carbon credit for taking a deep breath and the small degree to which I
just prevented imaginary famines and global catastrophes in the future
too? Is the profit so small, that I can't even be paid?
Meanwhile the Department of Defense is looking into how to
weaponize the weather in the future more than they already have in the
past. But in the main stream of B$ typical to journalists all the reporting is.... global warming!!!
Quick, someone take a deep breath...