Wednesday, August 26, 2015

Meh, I have to go... ramble, 8/26

The Socialist-Democrats won’t be able to do to Hispanics what they did to blacks.

Where is there evidence of that?

Regardless of the politics, the results are usually catastrophic:  
AMERICANS SEEM TO BE UNDER THE MISIMPRESSION THEY DON’T HAVE A country at all, but rather live in something like the international waiting room at JFK Airport. America is not a “nation of immigrants,” it is not an “idea,” it was never “diverse,” and “diversity” is a catastrophe.

 If America were an “idea,” every country on earth could be America. Electricity is an idea. The airplane is an idea. Washing with soap is an idea. That’s why other countries have been able to adopt those innovations. No other country on earth has been able to approximate America— except our fellow Anglo-Saxon nations.  Why is that? We’ve been dropping enormous hints to the rest of the world for centuries. America is not a mere landmass— otherwise, the Indians would have written the Declaration of Independence and put a man on the moon. Far from discovering America, Indians didn’t even detect America. There was no America until the British and Dutch arrived. They were not “immigrants” because there was no established society for them to move to. Without the white settlers, what is known as “America” would still be an unnamed continent full of migratory tribes chasing the rear end of a buffalo every time their stomachs growled.
For one hundred years before the signing of the Declaration, and one hundred years after, America was extraordinarily un-diverse in ethnicity (British, Dutch, West African, and Germanic), in religious practice (overwhelmingly Protestant, 98 percent Christian), in language (English), and in cultural mores (no wailing at funerals or child rape). Even the few French settlers in colonial America were Protestants— they had fled France under threat of forced conversion to Catholicism. Pre-Revolutionary America allowed the naturalization of Jews— but not Catholics. 5 Curiously, in contemporary America, Hispanic Protestants are majority Republican, while Hispanic Catholics are nearly monolithically Democrat. Harvard professor Samuel Huntington asks: “Would America be the America it is today if in the 17th and 18th centuries it had been settled not by British Protestants but by French, Spanish, or Portuguese Catholics?” Clearly not: “It would not be America; it would be Quebec, Mexico, or Brazil.” 6 Author Richard Brookhiser writes: “The WASP character is the American character. . . . It is the mold, the template, the archetype, the set of axes along which the crystal has grown. Without the WASP it would be another country altogether.”
((Coulter, Ann (2015-06-01). Adios, America: The Left's Plan to Turn Our Country into a Third World Hellhole
(Regnery Publishing))
  Now the WASP character is on Will and Grace prancing around as gay while the US Army is marching around in high heels thanks to you know who, just like Biden said. 

The End.

It's humorous that you were representing the "White supremacists" here until I started thinking, "Hey, seems like our group exists or somethin'. "

So as a representative of the "far right" beyond this softy Rick here's an interesting question about what is going on here implicitly:  Is Trump popular with the Chinese?   I don't mean the Chinese living in China.  I mean Chinese Americans and the way he's alienating them by attacking "China." Also, wouldn't they rather have a Chinese president? 

How is he doing with Arab groups?  How about Iranian Americans?  How are all the candidates doing with them as a minority group?  Do they ever have their handlers say to them,  "You better stop slobbering on Jewish oligarchs or you'll alienate the Iranian American vote.  Also, change the color of your tie... and wave your hands around like this, people like that.  Don't worry about what to say, we'll put it on the teleprompter before your next golf game and vacation." 

And so forth.  One can only imagine with these dreamers and entertainers!    Somehow it seems fitting that we have a reality show star beginning to play his implicitly White part in the Empire of Entertainment being produced in America now. 

Like the "racist" Reagan with his so-called dog whistle, Trump may even win.  I wonder who came up with that dog whistle thing.  Who thinks that White people beginning to perceive some type of a group interest in their little White/fair minds are dogs? 

It seems that anything is possible with "racism" now.  White people could be getting gunned down right in front of people* and in this anti-White Judaic culture where racism is just a code word for being anti-White:

"Well, they were just some racists."

*The latest stunt in the ethno/racial wars that have been going on around us in the "melting pot" for a while now:
Later in the manifesto, the writer quotes the Virginia Tech mass killer, Seung Hui Cho,  and calls him “his boy,” and expresses admiration for the Columbine High School killers. “Also, I was influenced by Seung–Hui Cho. [Asian, minority mentality] That’s my boy right there. He got NEARLY double the amount [of White people] that Eric Harris and Dylann Klebold [Jewish, gay minority mentality] got…just sayin’.
    [He talks about how he was attacked for being a gay, black man.]

“Yes, it will sound like I am angry…I am. And I have every right to be. But when I leave this Earth, the only emotion I want to feel is peace….”

“The church shooting was the tipping point…but my anger has been building steadily…I’ve been a human powder keg for a while…just waiting to go BOOM!!!!”
  This is another shooting with a theme chosen by a mental defective like Dylan Roof.   The theme doesn't really matter with some of these guys because they're probably on SSRIs.  Just consider, does going into a church and shooting old ladies really advance the cause of your group?  How?  And in this case, he apparently mentions that he's gay. 

All gays:

Yeah, that really helps them out as a group.  

But I would note that the Jews (Da Joos again... yup!) of the SPLC and the ADL typically use these events to call for hate speech laws while others of the tribe call for gun control in the corporate media of America.  (Enter Feinstein, Schumer, Bloomberg, etc.)   So apparently it's time to crack down on the free speech and gun rights of African Americans and gays instead of implicitly White Constitutionalists.  Perhaps if they're found leaving an electronic footprint of incitement on Twitter or Facebook, then arrest them?  Or:  "That hurt the feelings of White people.  Now you have to have sensitivity, diversity training!  Bring in the Albino pygmies that might be gay, how do you think these whites feel about your right to free speech?  Huh, huh!!!"  It's only skin color so I figure an imaginary Albino can represent all the feels and sensitivity needed.   

Apparently, back to something closer to reality: "It doesn't matter if you hurt the feels of White people as a group.  But gays, they're a group!  So is this White guy gay, or not?  Okay, he's just White... so it doesn't matter if  you hurt his feelings with your comments.  Diversity  training, over.... where's my paycheck for this crap?"   

In all this mess, remember the key words of the establishment now: 

Multiculturalism.  "Diversity." 

Why is that valued so highly by some?  Why does anyone need more diversity, what good is it?  Like Israel Zhangwell of "melting pot" fame among some of the terminally muddle headed goyim said, more diversity usually just creates problems and violence.  

Not to mention the fact that when everyone is blended, melted and integrated  together (Hispano/African identity incoming, Mexi/Africana/Spano... I suppose.) that there is actually less real diversity then.  The Judaic/mainstream "anti-racist" supporters of fake diversity are actually taking away real biological/racial and cultural diversity because it's supposedly just "skin color."   

No comments: