Tuesday, January 24, 2017

Comments, Ry Dawson... Native American "libertarian"....

Many points can be derived from that statement if you accept it. mynym's point is a good one. What is important to understand is that different peoples evolved to want to live differently, and mixing them up brings no advantages to anyone, but only conflicts on several different levels. I'm yet to have someone rationally explain to me what "racism" means. Are Jews racist? That seems to be what has kept them as a people for over 5000 years, so is racism then synonymous with long-term survival? Clearly, being cross-race altruistic (such as the Germans, the English and some Nordics nowadays, importing millions of muslims so they can pay taxes) seems to be the opposite of long-term survival, so that could be considered a clue into answering this question. Do we all not love our families more than other people's families? Is one's race not their extended family? So why would it be wrong to love one's extended family over others'? As far as I can understand, a "racist" is someone concerned about ensuring a future-legacy to his extended family.
So you can't just change society/language/ideologies and expect that everyone's neural nets will suddenly become equal on average, from an Australian Aborigine or any of the black peoples of the global South to a Northern Asian or a Northern European or any of the white peoples of the North. There's a reason that people have a saying about things "going South." All of this matters, given that the global South is going to continue to want to migrate North for the economic opportunities that rather mysteriously emerge wherever free white people, Asian people and the talented tenth of the black people go to live. (And of course, the Jews have left the white people of the North pretty much naked when it comes to tribalism. They've totally stripped them of their "racism"/identity. Unlike the Japanese, given that the Japanese didn't intern Jewish terrorists and subversives in camps and white people/Germans did. Although the Japanese did commit plenty of atrocities...) On a side note, black people of the South generally want to live as a minority among supposedly "oppressive" white people... for all the sniveling and complaining and Jewish anti-white/"anti-Nazi" incitement of Africans... they still want to live as a minority among whites. Or they want their children to go to school with whites, as if there's some magical way that whiteness and being fair/white minded will rub off. But the reverse is not true. That will continue to be a problem globally, especially as these feminist/globalist candidates with their lust for racial integration and the diversification of white ethnic groups continue to be defeated. An interesting aspect of it is that Asians can just sit in the background with secure borders, for the most part. At least until more Jews get there and begin doing what they usually do to ethnically homogeneous countries, a process that has already begun in small ways.

No comments: