That's ironic.

There were a number of reasons I retrieved and posted the 4 page police report from the East Rutherford, NJ P.D. and these FBI documents on the 9-11-2001 Dancing Israelis incident (links are below).  If any 9-11 researchers had seen them, they failed to make them available for public scrutiny.  As a consequence, some individuals have concluded that the Dancing Israelis were an "urban legend", based only on researchers' opinions and a slew of seemingly disparate facts.

Section 5, page 41

Fill out an FOIA request, or write a letter, and these public records are yours for a few dollars, or free.  So why have we not seen (until now) official documentation on these suspicious events - events that apparently never got a mention in the 9-11 Commission Report?  Zionism Stinks

The answer is right in the documents themselves:

"Give us twenty years and we'll take over your media and destroy your country."

That's the mentality.  Its source is the Talmudic teachings of the rabbis seeping out into softer secular versions.

Obamacare

It is hard to find the words to adequately describe how much of a disaster Obamacare is turning out to be.  The debut of Healthcare.gov has been probably the worst launch of a major website in history, millions of Americans are having their current health insurance policies canceled, millions of others are seeing the size of their health insurance premiums absolutely explode, and this new law is going to result in massive numbers of jobs being lost.  It is almost as if Obamacare was specifically designed to wreck the U.S. economy.  Not that what we had before Obamacare was great.  In fact, I have long argued that the U.S. health care system is a complete and total train wreck.  But now Obamacare is making everything that was bad about our system much, much worse.  

 Zerohedge

I'm not sure how Democrats are going to play this. 

Not surprising that Obama Inc. is better at winning elections than running the country.  Remember all their data mining and information processing capabilities when it came to that: 

"We are going to measure every single thing in this campaign," he said after taking the job.

He hired an analytics department five times as large as that of the 2008 operation, with an official "chief scientist" for the Chicago headquarters named Rayid Ghani, who in a previous life crunched huge data sets to, among other things, maximize the efficiency of supermarket sales promotions.

 Exactly what that team of dozens of data crunchers was doing, however, was a closely held secret.

"They are our nuclear codes," campaign spokesman Ben LaBolt would say when asked about the efforts. Around the office, data-mining experiments were given mysterious code names such as Narwhal and Dreamcatcher. The team even worked at a remove from the rest of the campaign staff, setting up shop in a windowless room at the north end of the vast headquarters office.

The "scientists" created regular briefings on their work for the President and top aides in the White House's Roosevelt Room, but public details were in short supply as the campaign guarded what it believed to be its biggest institutional advantage over Mitt Romney's campaign: its data.  (How Obama's data crunchers helped him win)

 If only they were as motivated when it came time to process the information for their healthcare laws, huh?

Comment from Collusus

"Stormed" DC trying "to create a war."

AIPAC lobbyists call it "crisis initiation."

But given that over 90% of Americans are tired of trying to find WMDs in everyone's underpants, apparently it's becoming more difficult to create wars now.

It's also a documented fact that anti-Semites now routinely use "Zionist" and "global bankers" to make their rants more ... "appealing."

It's also a documented fact that I grew up refuting Holocaust deniers and real anti-Semites.  But that doesn't mean that I have to support the idea of a human sacrifice/holocaust in which the cabala's sacred six number has the magical properties of creating a "right of return" to Zion.  (I.e. Rothschild Zionism and occultism.)

A lot of peasants died in another war while "global bankers" and oligarchs like the Bushes continued to finance a debt and death paradigms for peasants, that's generally all that can be said of WWII. 

But it's the same bigoted bullsh**.

No it isn't.  Patrick Clawson, the person talking about "crisis initiation" and lobbying for it in the link above probably isn't even Jewish ethnically.  (Not to mention whatever Google employee apparently froze the hit counter on that video.) 

But he is an exceptional Zionist and seems to know all about how to use false flags in order to create wars for "global bankers" to profit from.  I mean, an expert in how to create "crisis initiation" of the sort that only conspiracy theorists would be suspicious of...  for the sake of "national security." 

It's one thing to oppose US action in Syria, Iran, or elsewhere; It's another to use terminology that would make Farrakhan proud.

I don't care what you call it.  Figure out your own way of identifying the problem with ideologies of supremacy linked to a fusion of race/religion and state then.   But don't deny that there's a problem with what has been going on thanks to "Zionists" and PNAC/AIPAC/neocons.

An AIPAC lobbyists have every right -- like any other lobbyist -- to try to presuade lawmakers to act in the interests that they wish; in this case, Israel's.

And when they're lobbying dual citizens, the interests of Israel and Israeli corporations may be put before those of America.  Apparently there are a lot of "special relationships" involved when it comes trying to find WMDs in people's underpants.  (E.g. Chertoff's Rapiscan, scam.)  

You say they want to start a war; they would say they're trying to prevent their annihilation.

Because their illegal nuclear weapons program is about to be blown up or leak radiation on Israeli peasants more than it already has...  or what? 

One could just as easily frame Talmudic factions with their ideologies of racial and tribal/ethnic supremacy and history of terrorism as one can frame Islamic factions for their type of the same thing.  That framing is merely a matter of media and Propaganda Inc., not reality and facts about the factions involved.

 What if Arabs or Muslim thought that Israel and the U.S. were trying to kill or annihilate them and cited "clash of civilization" scholars or extreme "preemptive war" factions in America to prove it?  Would you argue that gives them a right to preemptive war or a right to go into Israel to try to find their illegal nuclear weapons? 

Saving a few links to research... I wasn't aware of the extent to which 911 may not be the only instance of Zionist terrorism.

La Voz de Aztlan (Mexican-American news service), in it's excellent investigative report revealed:
"La Voz de Aztlan has learned that the Israeli Embassy used heavy handed measures to have the two Israelis released. Very high level emergency meetings took place between Mexican Secretary of Foreign Relations Jorge Gutman, General Macedo de la Concha and a top Ariel Sharon envoy who flew to Mexico City specially for that purpose. Elías Luf of the Israeli Embassy worked night and day and their official spokeswoman Hila Engelhart went into high gear after many hours of complete silence. What went on during those high level meetings no one knows, but many in Mexico are in disbelief at their release." (5)
In November of 2001, 6 more suspicious Israelis were detained in an unspecified mid-eastern state. They had in their possession box cutters, oil pipeline plans, and nuclear power plant plans. (6) The local police called in the Feds and Immigration officials took over the scene and released the men without calling the FBI. The Jerusalem Post, the Miami Herald, (7) and the Times of London (8) all carried this amazing story and all revealed how furious FBI officials were that these terror suspects with nuclear power plant plans were allowed to go free. Of course, the corruption riddled FBI would only have caved into Zionist pressure from the Justice Department's Criminal Division boss, Michael Chertoff, and also from the ADL's "partner", FBI boss Robert Mueller - who would no doubt have found a way to eventually release those Israeli terror suspects too.
In December, 2001, the Los Angeles Times published the story of how two jewish terrorists were arrested by the FBI for plotting to blow up the office of US Congressman of Arab descent - Darrell Issa (R-CA), and a California mosque. (9) Irv Rubin and Earl Kruger of the Jewish Defense League (JDL) were charged with conspiracy to destroy a building by means of explosives. This story got brief national coverage but quickly disappeared too.  What Really Happened

It might be worth tracking down the original articles. 

Interesting comments..

Obomba's current war on whistleblowers should tell you something about the state of free speech in the west...

Edit: BTW, please save the responses that say I'm just a western knocker or Obomba damner. It's not bringing anything new to the argument, and is nothing but an ad hominem. There's a reality that the citizens of N. America need to wake up to in terms of imperialism and what problems that has created for both the world and our self. Starting with the first genocide of native peoples that's ongoing (as we can see from the uranium Black Hills of the Lakota people, to the tar sands rivers of the Dene people up in North Athabasca, AB), to our other current genocidal wars over the past decade in the middle east (where the uranium mined, poisoning, & killing Lakota children [*] travels 7,000 miles across the planet to reach Iraqi children, giving them neonatal abnormalities or death[*]) which have left the former in current civil war and chaos, and is about to leave the latter with virtually the same landscape.

The United States and it's NATO allies have been doing this in many countries throughout the world from South America to Africa, to the South Pacific and Eastern Europe, etc, for decades. They don't call it dirty wars for nothing. Do some research on Col. James Steele, and learn about how he trained death squads in Honduras during the '80s (still funded by US to this day) and then gets sent to Iraq to do the same thing to the new "police" force that terrorizes neighborhoods and runs torture houses (only took him a two year stay in Iraq to make sure it was setup for civil war). The same sad mess is happening in Afghanistan where the chief of NATO and US operations there, General Joseph Dunford, told the press two days ago that the Afghani National Police they've been creating over the last decade+ (aka Northern Alliance opium warlords (historical enemies of southern pashtun farmers/Taliban) who's commanders consist of pedophiles and opium addicts) were loosing too many men (he forgot to mention American tax dollars which now adds up to 2-4 trillion dollars today), to the point that we need NATO and the US to keep supporting them for another five years. [*] You may be confused (since the "official" pull out is supposed to happen in 2014), but after going through one of the many US road blockades that are still operated in Iraq to this day, you would realize that "pulling out" really means finishing up a monstrous shit on the entire country, and then leaving our underwear behind to be washed and reused until worn through. The only difference now, is that in Afghanistan, we may have to keep our ass on the shitter for five more years...

I'm sorry but we must face up to the geopolitical reality that is before us, no matter how much of a mockery we can make of it. Western media or citizens bashing Putin or Chavez by name-calling them as dictators is ridiculous. Did Putin or Chavez cause even a fraction of the amount of damage that the US/NATO has over the last decade? No, they were too busy bringing their own people out from under the trenches - that were the disastrous western imported neoliberal economic policies aka soft imperialism aka resource robbery (which devastated these countries socio-economically for years). As far as dictators, let's look at the fact that US presidents can (and have) gone to (overt and cover) war without congressional or public approval or can legally and indefinitely detain it's own citizens...I mean who really has the most dictatorial, and in turn militaristic power on the planet right now? Now, Russia and Venezuela certainly are not perfect or anywhere near that(ie. I'm very critical of the new left environmental political grand standing in South America), but they certainly haven't been as imperialistic or militaristic as the western world and it's dictated "democracy" building...

Edit 2: I apologize for mentioning mainstream western media so many times (I know it's cliche). It's just something we must be very wary of today, when looking at the process of war. Just take a glimpse at how they're treating the conflict in Syria... 

From: Debunking Global Research at Metabunk

WTC 7 vs. the Big Picture