Wednesday, December 11, 2013
Delaware Inc.
From Delaware Liberal:
Meanwhile:
I think I might try to focus and be a more focused blogger for a while instead of being "Mr. Read Everything," as my wife put it tonight.
Who am I kidding, I'm just going to keep reading and writing at this point.
Tom Carper and Chris Coons are co-chairs of “The Third Way” , a corporate Democrat’s think tank in Washington that has been described as “oligarchy promoters pretending to be reasonable.”I don't know why they're even bothering, given that Warren probably couldn't do anything about regulatory agencies that have been captured anyway.
Aside from Carper and Coons, the leadership of the Third Way is, “made up almost entirely of investment bankers and other Wall Street executives.[5] So it is not surprising that Caper’s organization is going all out to undermine and discredit Elizabeth Warren.
Meanwhile:
At a time when Wall Street is absolutely swimming in wealth, New York City is experiencing an epidemic of homelessness. According to the New York Times, the last time there was this many homeless children in New York City was during the days of the Great Depression. And the number of homeless children in the United States overall recently set a new all-time record.New York City Has The Most Homeless Children Since The Great Depression, Zerohedge
I think I might try to focus and be a more focused blogger for a while instead of being "Mr. Read Everything," as my wife put it tonight.
Who am I kidding, I'm just going to keep reading and writing at this point.
Metabunk
Metabunk - Error
Lol... today has been a funny day.
I think I'm going to join the forums at AboveTopSecret.com or maybe other sites where people aren't into going into some sort of weird "debunking" mode on all conspiracies. Given that the world is full of conspiracies, so you have to become a better conspiracy theorist or supplant the crazy conspiracies mixed in with an element of truth (Alex Jones) with a good, evidence based analysis of real conspiracies (Ry Dawson).
Mick has basically found a "Let's try to be more specific." excuse to program Metabunk to turn into the material of satire on 911 truth. But more and more people are becoming familiar with the evidence and the most likely explanations based on it, so it's going to wind up being him and the corporate media against the internet eventually.
I don't think he's corrupt like some people in the corporate media seem to be. It seems more likely that he just has his little hobby and supposed "debunking" habits that happen to be programmed and structured in such a way as to support his general theories and naive worldview. I wonder if he was a boy scout. Anyway, Metabunk is full of bunk... so I'm off to the conspiracy theorists.
Metabunk 12/11
I always almost forget how Mick is. It's too bad that a smart guy is willing to make himself into the material of satire, for whatever reason. My theory on that is that he's so used to dealing with "conspiracy theorists" that are wrong or silly that he'd try to debunk a conspiracy that actually existed out of habit. So even is something actually was a conspiracy that the "official sources just took a leak on me" corporate media couldn't get right, he'd never know it. Too busy going into debunking mode out of habit. That's my theory, anyway... too bad he basically doesn't allow any theories but his own on his site.
The reason I insist points be individual addressed is that otherwise we just get arguments based on the length of lists of points. And one can always add another point to the list.
Given your own big picture or theoretical thinking, it probably wouldn't even matter if a number of the individual points were verified.
In this case, if the passport was linked to a report of an Urban Moving Systems van driving by and an Israeli reportedly dressed as an Arab, getting out and doing a little dance and then dropping something on the ground the "debunking" mentality would probably go into effect in this way.
"They weren't really dancing. Define dancing. They were probably just waving their arms. People wave their arms all the time, nothing to see... move along."
"They weren't really dressed as an Arab, even if that's what the police report says. Define Arab. Define dressing. Everyone wears clothes and they were just wearing clothes."
"They may not have really dropped anything on the ground and no one saw that it was a passport. People drop stuff on the ground all the time. They probably dropped their wallet. People do that all the time. It's just a wallet. Here's a picture of a wallet."
Points and facts need a theoretical framework to exist in.
Isn't it all?
The reason I insist points be individual addressed is that otherwise we just get arguments based on the length of lists of points. And one can always add another point to the list.
Given your own big picture or theoretical thinking, it probably wouldn't even matter if a number of the individual points were verified.
In this case, if the passport was linked to a report of an Urban Moving Systems van driving by and an Israeli reportedly dressed as an Arab, getting out and doing a little dance and then dropping something on the ground the "debunking" mentality would probably go into effect in this way.
"They weren't really dancing. Define dancing. They were probably just waving their arms. People wave their arms all the time, nothing to see... move along."
"They weren't really dressed as an Arab, even if that's what the police report says. Define Arab. Define dressing. Everyone wears clothes and they were just wearing clothes."
"They may not have really dropped anything on the ground and no one saw that it was a passport. People drop stuff on the ground all the time. They probably dropped their wallet. People do that all the time. It's just a wallet. Here's a picture of a wallet."
Tribalism
Get right down to it and perhaps the question is, what ISN'T an odious form of debt/money in America. Maybe the debt/money spent on having shrimp running on treadmills... that I might agree needs to be paid back to the Chinese or whoever.
But you want to try to pay all the "national debt" back through the Talmudic/Masonic bankstering system by which it was created, based on cutting medicare for the elderly or whatever? Real. Dumb. If anything, Israel should have to begin sending foreign aide to Americans and Talmudic/Masonic bankers on 33rd Liberty Street in NYC should have to "bail out" the American sheeple instead of continually shearing them.
Now that the war with Syria/Iran has gone cold, the opportunities to create more odious debts for the sake of tribal interests may be more limited. Perspectives on what to do about that probably vary, given what tribe members have said in the past:
They'll stop proposing that a president be assassinated or arguing that "Well, we did call ahead before we bombed..." just call them up. They're not really nefarious masterminds, geniuses based on race. There's a lot of idiots in the mix too. And many are generally just some people that have been utterly inculcated with tribalism and fear, which naturally creates "conspiracies" or factions "breathing together." That's probably why it's pretty jarring and an "I'll call you back." breathtaking moment when they have to think about or try to empathize with a perspective outside of their perceived tribe.
Good comment on that article:
Jewish factions don't secretly control the world, they fairly openly conspire to and usually have an impact on it disproportionate to their numbers due to tribalism though. It's not a matter of fully articulated conspiratorial genius among all tribe members. It's just a matter of maintaining tribalism in general (while often working to dissolve all other tribes and factions).
Tribalism isn't even always all bad, it's a matter of looking out for your own or those that you consider family. But when that mentality becomes similar to the family/mafia, then there's a problem. "If you can't hate your family, then you can't follow me." Jesus
Or something like that. Take your pick of what he said, as basically every other thing He said or did refuted or undermined rabbinic attempts to establish tribalism and racism.
But you want to try to pay all the "national debt" back through the Talmudic/Masonic bankstering system by which it was created, based on cutting medicare for the elderly or whatever? Real. Dumb. If anything, Israel should have to begin sending foreign aide to Americans and Talmudic/Masonic bankers on 33rd Liberty Street in NYC should have to "bail out" the American sheeple instead of continually shearing them.
Now that the war with Syria/Iran has gone cold, the opportunities to create more odious debts for the sake of tribal interests may be more limited. Perspectives on what to do about that probably vary, given what tribe members have said in the past:
Andrew Adler, the owner and publisher of the Atlanta Jewish Times, a weekly newspaper serving Atlanta's Jewish community, devoted his January 13, 2012 column to the thorny problem of the U.S. and Israel's diverging views on the threat posed by Iran. Basically Israel has three options, he wrote: Strike Hezbollah and Hamas, strike Iran, or "order a hit" on Barack Obama. Either way, problem solved! ....All people have to do is push back a little bit on the siege mentality and the racism and ideologies of supremacy that Judaics are being inculcated with. There again, you have to ACTUALLY DO THAT and stop letting them get away with murder because you're scared of being called names. "Antisemitic." Etc.
A nervous Adler told me over the phone that he wasn't advocating Obama's assassination by Mossad agents. "Of course not," he said.
But do you think Israel should consider it an option? "No."
But do you believe that Israel is in fact considering the option in its most inner circles? "No. Actually, no. I was hoping to make clear that it's unspeakable—god forbid this would ever happen. I take it you're quoting me?"
Yes. "Oh, boy."
When I asked Adler why, if he didn't advocate assassination and didn't believe Israel was actually considering it, he wrote a column saying he believed that the option was "on the table," he asked for a minute to compose himself and call me back. Link
They'll stop proposing that a president be assassinated or arguing that "Well, we did call ahead before we bombed..." just call them up. They're not really nefarious masterminds, geniuses based on race. There's a lot of idiots in the mix too. And many are generally just some people that have been utterly inculcated with tribalism and fear, which naturally creates "conspiracies" or factions "breathing together." That's probably why it's pretty jarring and an "I'll call you back." breathtaking moment when they have to think about or try to empathize with a perspective outside of their perceived tribe.
Good comment on that article:
Really working to NOT dispel that whole Jews-secretly-control-the-world trope, are you Adler?In all seriousness though: I've asked this before but what does the U.S. actually *get* for our alliance with Israel? I mean yes, thanks, I know they're the only actual democracy in the Middle East but what things do they actually provide us with in return for us *endlessly* shielding them? Call me stupid but I thought the meat-and-drink of being "allies" was a sort of healthy give an take. But mostly it seems to actually work out this way:
U.S. Gives Israel: Everything
Israel Gives U.S.: Scorn, Belittlement, Essential Blackmailing of Our Elected Representatives, and, Every 18 Months, the Revelation That They're *Still* Spying On Us
Jewish factions don't secretly control the world, they fairly openly conspire to and usually have an impact on it disproportionate to their numbers due to tribalism though. It's not a matter of fully articulated conspiratorial genius among all tribe members. It's just a matter of maintaining tribalism in general (while often working to dissolve all other tribes and factions).
Tribalism isn't even always all bad, it's a matter of looking out for your own or those that you consider family. But when that mentality becomes similar to the family/mafia, then there's a problem. "If you can't hate your family, then you can't follow me." Jesus
Or something like that. Take your pick of what he said, as basically every other thing He said or did refuted or undermined rabbinic attempts to establish tribalism and racism.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)