Monday, October 06, 2014

And yet... more rambling 10/6


Freedumb.

Were people in colonial times or before WWI (and the refinement of Propaganda Inc. by Zionists to get America into the war in order to get the Balfour Declaration) really this utterly stupid and ignorant? 

Maybe.  But I doubt it.

So how did it happen?  Being tricked into two World Wars and all the degradation that follows war and propaganda in the corporate media seems to have had something to do with it, seems to me.  The governing philosophy of multiculturalism for the goyim combined with supporting abject nationalism and racism (as Biden does) for those that fancy themselves as elite seems to have something to do with it.  Because then they rise to the top through ethnic networking until the multicult finally says, "Huh?  Now it's time for us to take affirmative actions."    

There's trying to see the Big Picture and the meta of the meta of the meta.  (David Anderson on it, points to the Administrative State:  "It seems like the trends* surrounding WWI had something to do with it. Something, I just can't quite point my finger on it.")    There's that sort of thing.  And then there's the stuff that people usually talk about.  E.g., Moseley and Nobody debating or trying to come up with strategeries to win elections for Republicans and Democrats.

I'm fine with that, although I view it as entertainment.  Maybe I've gone Big Picture to the point of missing something and it matters in reality.  I'm open to theories, ideas... and more importantly, lines of evidence. 

*
Some of the biggest men in the United States, in the field of commerce and manufacture, are afraid of something. They know that there is a power somewhere so organized, so subtle, so watchful, so interlocked, so complete, so pervasive, that they better not speak above their breath when they speak in condemnation of it. They know that America is not a place of which it can be said, as it used to be, that a man may choose his own calling and pursue it just as far as his abilities enable him to pursue it; because to-day, if he enters certain fields, there are organizations which will use means against him that will prevent his building up a business which they do not want to have built up; organizations that will see to it that the ground is cut from under him and the markets shut against him. For if he begins to sell to certain retail dealers, to any retail dealers, the monopoly will refuse to sell to those dealers, and those dealers, afraid, will not buy the new man's wares.  --Woodrow Wilson

No comments: