Comment on culture, entertainment and politics...

The voting blocs you're losing to the Left have been crafted based on idols like "Martin Luther" King/Michael King held up to peasants.  He's the Nelson Mandela model held up to duped peasants, except that Americans haven't been killed to the same extent that Afrikaners have been.  Although, I guess in a sense some have been.  Look at the evidence and the American failure to at least say that Hollywood is full of the same forms of racial incitement directed against the goyim by its directors and handlers in its cultural background and so forth.  (No need to pass hate crimes laws, police entertainment or form a Goyim Anti-defamation League..  but you should at least say who is usually inciting African Americans to riot and causing black mob violence and so on.  All the while, Jews fail to make any movies about their role in monetizing slaves in the first place.  After all, that would be incitement or a hate crime.) 

It's all free rainbows!  (The fine print: except, well...  not really.)  Etc.   

One of the reasons that you're losing is that you do not challenge lies and idolatry in a revolutionary way, based on the truth.  The truth is sitting there.  Facts, logic, evidence...  original documents, eye witness testimony and so on and yet you're more interested in politics and entertainment.  And then you wonder why producers of main streams of media and entertainment are far more influential than you are?  Or why you cannot suddenly turn cultural voting blocs your way when your own culture (Not to mention their own.) has been cultivated against you and your interests?  The cost of admission for these forms of entertainment are larger than people can admit.              

For example, instead of going along with the mainstream media and focusing on a charlatan and plagiarizer like Michael King/"Martin Luther" King you could advocate for a national holiday honoring a builder of schools and civilization:

Booker Taliaferro Washington (April 5, 1856 – November 14, 1915) was an African-American educator, author, orator, and advisor to presidents of the United States. Between 1890 and 1915, Washington was the dominant leader in the African-American community.  --Wikipedia

Notice the difference, where was all the rioting and violence?  Jesse Jackson?  Al Sharpton?   What is the difference between them and David Anderson or Booker T.? 

 As far as Delaware goes you're already marginal.  You're already outside the mainstream.  You're already losing voting blocs created by the media and the lethal forms of entertainment that have been fed to African "agit prop" Americans.  Why not focus on and tell the truth?  It would be better for them and you.  One of the things about it.  They're so degraded that they may not vote.  And their demographic is in decline and may become even more marginal due to immigration and the absolutely lethal mix of entertainment  that they've been fed. 

I know, you want to win elections.  More entertainment.  Perceptions are reality.  Etc.    You're probably right, as far as that goes.  Although one could be forgiven for wondering what the point of that is if you're generally going to let cultural trends based on lies (Booker T. vs. MLK, etc.) continue.   

Apparently we are in different worlds and not interested in the same things.  Politics = entertainment?