His opposing a current power structure doesn't mean he wouldn't impose his own version of it with his own in-group if he could.
(speculation only and not saying he would).[/quote]
Given
the philosophy that Jones has laid down over the years he would
discredit himself if he tried to partner with the DOJ or the DHS to
create "hate speech" or "hate groups" lists like the SPLC does and so
forth. He already has a record, so no one would listen to him anymore
if he violated his own First/Second Amendment principles.
With
respect to speculation, given that the SPLC was apparently created by
Talmudists perhaps it's not surprising that their way is to centralize
power over all other tribes or "hate groups" while apparently failing to
mention the racial supremacy typical factions of the "in group"/tribe
they may tend to identify with. (E.g. Chabad.) [ex]“…If a Jew needs a
liver, can you take the liver of an innocent
non-Jew passing by to save him? The Torah would probably permit that.
Jewish life has an infinite value,” he explained. “There is something
infinitely more holy and unique about Jewish life than non-Jewish
life.”— Chabad-Lubavitch Rabbi Yitzhak Ginsburgh in “Jewish Week,” the
largest Jewish publication in the United States, April 26, 1996.[/ex] Etc.
I can find no record of the SPLC condemning Chabad or listing Zionists
along with other tribal/racist hate groups that want their own nations
based on perceptions of race or tribe.
I
could be wrong. But it seems that what progressive dupes of the SPLC
seem to be trying to see in Jones based on shadows and fact free
"speculation" could be seen in the Southern Poverty Law Center, if
anywhere. Speculation only, I'm not saying that the SPLC might have the
same Talmudic mentality as many Jewish Bolsheviks that weren't really
crying themselves to sleep over the poverty of Russian peasants after
they helped centralize power and wound up starving millions of them to death.
(Given the history of those with a Talmudic mentality the SPLC probably
just wants to help win a war on poverty while paying themselves
$300,000 in compensation and partnering with the DHS to try to police
every form of tribalism or every hate group but Chabad, right? Or
not.) All speculation only, not saying that they might begin to
impose their version of a power structure to police all other tribes but
their own in group if they could.
Anyway,
can anyone here do a better job of framing Jones as a totalitarian or
fascist? You take Jones as an apparen Constitutionalists and I'll take
the SPLC and the way that they've begun working with the DOJ and DHS to
try to police everyone but their own in group/tribe and so forth. It
should be easy given that the SPLC supposedly wants to give everyone
free ponies to poop happy and gay rainbows of tolerance and love
everywhere, right?
[quote]There
were corporate and state structures before fascism was instituted in
Germany. So it was once an 'outsider' view.[/quote]
Fascist
leaders emerged from socialist parties because fascism is the heretical
branch of socialism. So it's not as if they were civil libertarians
before but then once they got power they turned into fascists and
socialists. The historical record shows that they were always
totalitarians and always had a tribal mentality, just like the
Talmudists that they tended to enter into racist dialectics with. (Best
to leave them both to debate who the chosen or supreme race is and go
out and so something useful in life, seems to me.)
Given
the facts about fascism it's likely that your unsupported speculations
about Jones will always remain just that. But if there are some facts
that support theories about Jones being "in many ways" a fascist or his
being a fascist in the "doesn't mean he wouldn't be one in the future"
world of hazy hopium and change, then have at it. Because so far I
could probably do a better job of arguing that the SPLC has totalitarian
goals.
No comments:
Post a Comment