Obama can do fine with or without a teleprompter.
He handled himself well in all but one presidential debate.[/quote]
He needed help:
Mainly because he was lying, as usual.
[QUOTE]What does the teleprompter have to do with this anyway?[/QUOTE]
When you're reading the words of someone else, that's part of the script that goes along with acting.
[quote]What is so different between Obama's mannerisms in 1990 and today?[/quote]
It's
not necessary to try to define some deep change in mannerisms. It's
fair to say that he is an actor. That he's been trained how to act, etc. Plus he sometimes gets a little lost without his teleprompter
because his words often aren't even his own and sometimes it's doubtful that he even knows that what he's saying is a lie. ("You can keep your plan. It's on my teleprompter so it must be true.")
It's not a big deal to say that presidents are liars and actors for most people. So even if a change in mannerisms could be defined and evidence that he is an actor found in that way, why would that matter to you?
It's not a big deal to say that presidents are liars and actors for most people. So even if a change in mannerisms could be defined and evidence that he is an actor found in that way, why would that matter to you?
1 comment:
well I see you to were banned from metajunk
Post a Comment