No real time for this... just a ramble. Not really an important issue.

(Interesting that both Paula Jones and Monica Lewinsky show Bill Clinton’s same preferences.)

Except that one could have been a spy playing the part of a bimbo that was transferred to the Pentagon (smart enough to save her blue dress, etc.) while the other was most likely just another victim of a psychopath.

It's not as if the corporate media was really going to follow through on an actual investigation.  They never do.  After all, the narrative in the corporate media was set that she was just a bimbo.  And narrative > fact, once a story is propagated and "set."  But how do these narratives get started through the "main streams" of information that govern DC, again?

And what if factions in the NSA were listening, the possibilities are endless when a president makes himself that vulnerable.  But according to the narratives of the corporate media no one knew about it (no one at all) and Monica was just a witless bimbo.  (Apparently it's normal for a bimbo to save a dress with DNA on it.)

Regardless, once the narrative or "how it plays" is set in the minds of trendy journalists (blue or red, Left or Right), why would they actually investigate any other more important or significant angles than "set" or settled stories?

Look at Moseley and Nobody, still framing their debate within the narratives of "workplace" vs. "private" originally created by the corporate media...  all these years later. 

No need to investigate beyond that, after all... the story was that Lewinsky was just a bimbo that happened by.  (Sort of like the troupes of bumbling clowns in the national security state that bumble their way to bigger budgets and more influence for their factions or criminal bureaucracies every time terrism takes place.) 

Maybe that's all she is, a bumbling bimbo... if she isn't, then she plays the part of a clown well.  But any sinister aspect to these clowns should be an open question, given everything going on in the background:

On a visit to Washington, D.C., in 1998, Netanyahu hooked up with Jerry Falwell at the Mayflower Hotel the night before his scheduled meeting with Clinton.
   “I put together 1,000 people or so to meet with Bibi and he spoke to us 
that night,” recalls Falwell. “It was all planned by Netanyahu as an 
affront to Mr. Clinton.”
   That evening, Falwell promised Netanyahu that he would mobilize pastors 
all over the country to resist the return of parts of the occupied West 
Bank territory to the Palestinians. Televangelist John Hagee, who gave $1 
million to the United Jewish Appeal the following month, told the crowd 
that the Jewish return to the Holy Land signaled the “rapidly approaching 
… final moments of history,” then brought them to a frenzy chanting, “Not 
one inch!”—a reference to how much of the West Bank should be transferred 
to Palestinian control.
   The next day, Netanyahu met with Clinton at the White House. “Bibi told me 
later,” Falwell recalls, “that the next morning Bill Clinton said, ‘I know 
where you were last night.’ The pressure was really on Netanyahu to give 
away the farm in Israel. It was during the Monica Lewinsky scandal.… 
Clinton had to save himself, so he terminated the demands [to relinquish 
West Bank territory] that would have been forthcoming during that meeting, 
and would have been very bad for Israel.”   Vanity Fair

  That's just a Christian Zionist saying that the Lewinsky scandal brought pressure on Clinton.  Factions in Israel:

....Likud-oriented Israelis, fearing the effects of presidential pressure on their government, perceived Lewinsky in positive terms, as a modern-day Queen Esther "whose intimate relationship with the nation's rulers saves her people from a horrific fate."23 Or, more pungently: "Monica will go down in history as the woman who had sex with an American president and saved an Israeli prime minister."24
   In contrast, Labor Party circles in Israel excused the U.S. president out of friendship for him. Thus, Yitzhak Rabin's widow Leah affectionately called him "quite a rascal [who] should have been more careful."  meforum.org

  I guess like including the Book of Esther in the Bible in the first place, once the script and the "Scripture"/narrative is set... the facts don't matter.  So to suggest that Lewinsky wasn't just another bumbling and stumbling clown among all the troupes of them in DC...  would be beyond the "mainstream." 

There again, I have no use for the corporate media and the main stream of lemmings anymore.

So what if groups of psychopaths usually are not all as stupid and incompetent as they sometimes make themselves appear in order to hide their conspiracies and their intents?  What if Hillary wasn't just incompetent on Benghazi and didn't bumble and stumble and then hit her head or whatever before she could testify, like yet another clown? 

I'm tired of all these clowns and the shows that they put on.  (Actually, I doubt that even W was half so dumb as he appeared.)  Shrug.  More entertainment.