Still glad we stopped this, for now.

Obama Losing Face Over Obamacare Death Spiral

Freedom of Thought Requires Free Media

Interesting thoughts on trends in technology and likely scenarios having to do with its impact on the cultural petri dish.

ELECTRICAL GRID BLACKOUT to be the Next FALSE FLAG ATTACK!!!!

Three minutes in: "Probably nothing will happen..."

Oh, ok. Lol.

Big ramble of the day... because I felt like processing some thoughts.

 It must be odd... the level of cognitive dissonance it takes for a Christian to support Jewish tribalists (intermarriage is illegal*, etc.) raining down white phosphorous on Palestinian Christians or bombing, undermining and destroying Persian/Syrian civilizations to the detriment of Syrian Christians too.    

*

In 1947 David Ben-Gurion and the religious parties reached an agreement that included an understanding that matters of personal status in Israel, which included marriage, would continue to be determined by religious authorities. This arrangement has been termed the status quo agreement and has been maintained despite numerous changes of government since.
   ....  in 1953 rabbinical courts were established with jurisdiction over matters of marriage and divorces of all Jews in Israel, nationals and residents. (section 1) It was also provided that marriages and divorces of Jews in Israel would be conducted according to the law of the Torah. (section 2)
   Since 1953 the rabbinate has only approved marriages between Jews in Israel conducted in accordance with the Orthodox interpretation of halakha... 
  Jewish marriage and divorce in Israel is under the jurisdiction of the Chief Rabbinate of Israel, which defines a person's Jewish status strictly according to halakha. The rabbinate's standards and interpretations in these matters are generally used by the Israeli Interior Ministry in registering marriages and divorces.
  Halakhic and biblical restrictions on marriage are applied in Israel. So, for example, a kohen may not marry a convert to Judaism.  --Wikipedia

  Etc. 

It must be odd for Christian Zionists to support anti-miscegenation laws, racism and ideologies of racial/tribal supremacy on that level when they're simultaneously being told by the Zionist/mainstream media that they shouldn't do that.

Not to mention the issue of "separation of religion and state" by which some Jewish tribalists and racists attack American Christians so that they can't have so much as a nativity scene based on any form of local community, on local public property and what not.  But if Christians were involved in supporting and establishing an entire "Christian state" just like they are supporting a "Jewish state" with foreign aide and support, then apparently they could have their nativity scenes?   

Apparently if anyone wants to "establish" their religion (including marriage laws) and impose it on others then they should convert to the political cult of Zionism.  Then you don't have to worry about hurting someone's feelings with a nativity scene.  In fact, then you can get out a bulldozer and level their house without being concerned that they'll be crying themselves to sleep over an imposition of religion.
 
Although... one would think that an "imposition" of Talmudic forms of religion might hurt someone's feelings, given that their house just got bulldozed.  So where are the "see you in court" lawsuits of Talmudists over that imposition or "establishment" of religious beliefs? 

It's interesting that Richard Cohen* probably just made the mistake of thinking that everyone else had a "conventionally" Jewish mentality with respect to interracial marriage too.  Oops.  Now he's in trouble.  Because ironically, the dumb "goyim" don't necessarily have the "It makes me want to gag." reflex that he projected onto them... but he still has that reflex.

All you have to do is look at the establishment of that tribal mentality in Israel, where they're still trying to police marriages.  Duh.  Or listen when a tribalist/Talmudist says to Anthony Weiner, "You married an Arab." As if marrying a beautiful Arab woman is some sort of a great insult, etc. 

Duh.  You're often not going to understand what's going on around you in the news without understanding Talmudic ideologies or their secular versions based on a mentality of racial superiority.

*Here’s more evidence of the trend: Richard Cohen of the Washington Post standing up for Romney’s superior Jewish culture argument in a column called “For Israelis and Palestinians, a difference beyond question.” Cohen is a liberal Democrat, but his column exposes the chauvinistic thinking about Jews and Israel that underlies even “liberal” considerations of the issue. Again, the guy might as well be a neocon. The neocons were all Democrats a while back.
Cohen’s putdown of Palestinians scarcely acknowledges the occupation and says nothing about the destruction of the educated elites that Israel achieved with the Nakba. I simply don’t understand how American liberals can get away with this sort of racial contempt about countries half the world away. Oh and what about all the Palestinian businesses destroyed? What about brilliant young men like the late Ibrahim Abu-Lughod, forced to follow through on their studies in foreign countries?  Link

Note that if Palestinians were able to incorporate themselves in elite networks in America based on tribalism then they'd own a lot of patents and probably begin to think of themselves as racially superior in some way too.  Just think if they began to be put in charge of creating money out of nothing by the goyim or began being able to lend tribe members money at zero percent interest, etc.

Apparently people think that there's actually some biological cause for what is happening other than perceptions and perhaps dispositions.  Meanwhile, back in reality...  the main reason that there is disparity is the ideology of Talmudism/tribalism and ethnic/racial supremacy vs. some deep problems with Islamic ideologies and modern Islamic cultures too.  And that's generally all it amounts to.  There's no real difference in the physical structure of brains or some sort of "This little bit of DNA did it." that's the explanation for all of this.

Not to mention that those supposed racial structures of the brain or that supposed "This little DNA string is real important or somethin'." are always one romantic relationship away from being shredded when people of different "races" have sex with each other.  Duh.

Yet another ramble though... one thing that does tend to be important is skin color, due to the psychological effects of perceptions about being "dark"/evil or "fair"/just.  Which ironically, is really quite unfair to darker skinned people... and pretty dumb.  But even if it's stupid and there's no justification for it, it leads to huge results anyway and mass "perceptions are reality" for most people.  But even there, the answer is sex and romance.  (Although people can have a child with black skin within one generation, or even twins... one with black/evil skin from the "dark ages" and one with "enlightened" fair/just/good skin.  It's pretty silly.  I guess the fair twin would be superior to the dark twin, huh?  Silly. But that's the way people tend to be with respect to their perceptions, as light combined with fine or more symmetrical features tends to = good for them.  Enlightening, huh?)  

I might think more about this later.

The terminated policies are a feature, not a bug. Obama never should have said what he did, because it was a lie and he knew it.

Single payer, here we come!

You realize that the federal government is going to borrow debt/money into existence from an international cartel of bankers in order to pay for that, right?  And they ultimately control the money/debt. Therefore the government won't be able to "afford" to redistribute much wealth in reality, as everything shifts around and toward the .001% due to the fact that they've already given away the power of the government to create money. 

This will be the case no matter what you do to try to make healthcare affordable or to try to get people "covered" in ponzi.  Plus now everyone is going to think that Obama's "socialism" failed thanks to "We are all socialists now." Newsweek and so forth.  He's not a socialist but people think he is.  Republicans are not capitalists but people think they are.  So socialists and capitalists will continue to take the blame for the banksterism of the Democrats and the Republicans.  As the ponzi continues to come back on more and more Americans they'll blame socialism or capitalism... or the person on food stamps because their job has been outsourced or the upper middle class of "rich people" (Papa John has too many swimming pools, etc.) that actually create pizza or wealth in reality (unlike the .001% or political operatives of banksters like Soros).

It's all due to "socialism" or "capitalism"... but apparently you won't blame the prevalence of banksterism and follow the money.  So that's, that...

On a side note, it is true that socialism doesn't work.  Robert Owen followed the American tradition of experimentalism and found that, as have numerous other people.  It's always more disastrous than capitalism (which is already disastrous) unless people are following the advice of Christ to love each other or are overflowing with His Spirit of empathy.  And that's never going to happen when people are ruled by tribalists/Talmudists that hate Christ and others unless He makes it happen by converting a member of their political cult again, as He did with the apostle Paul and so forth. 

Are you going to plan based on miraculous events or make plans based on repeated events that can be observed?

What can be observed of socialism historically:

Community experiment in America (1825)

In 1825, such an experiment was attempted under the direction of his disciple, Abram Combe, at Orbiston near Glasgow; and in the next year Owen himself began another at New Harmony, Indiana, U.S., sold to him by George Rapp. After a trial of about two years both failed completely.
....
The word "socialism" first became current in the discussions of the "Association of all Classes of all Nations" which Owen formed in 1835[6] with himself as Preliminary Father.  During these years his secularistic teaching gained such influence among the working classes as to give occasion for the statement in the Westminster Review (1839) that his principles were the actual creed of a great portion of them.

At this period, some more communistic experiments were made, of which the most important were that at Ralahine, in County Clare, Ireland, and that at Tytherly in Hampshire. The former (1831) proved a remarkable success for three-and-a-half years until the proprietor, having ruined himself by gambling, had to sell out. Tytherly, begun in 1839, failed absolutely.

By 1846 the only permanent result of Owen's agitation, so zealously carried on by public meetings, pamphlets, periodicals, and occasional treatises remained the co-operative movement, and for the time even that seemed to have utterly collapsed. He died at his native town on 17 November 1858.  --Wikipedia

Socialism = abject failure. 

We don't need to try it or experiment with it again.  Technology isn't going to change forms of consciousness that the historical record shows that only empathy or Jesus (the empathy of God) changes. 

Technology is merely a matter of technique.